Brainscape's Knowledge GenomeTM

Browse over 1 million classes created by top students, professors, publishers, and experts.


See full index

Law paper 1 > Cases Paper 1 > Flashcards

Cases Paper 1 Flashcards

You may prefer our related Brainscape-certified flashcards:
MPRE flashcards MBE flashcards Civil Procedure 1L flashcards
1
Q

case to show an actus reus must be a voluntary act

A

R v Mitchell

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
2
Q

case to show contractual duty

A

R v Pitwood

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
3
Q

Case to show duty of relationship

A

R v Gibbins and Proctor

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
4
Q

Case to show duty undertaken voluntarily

A

R v Stone and Dobinson

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
5
Q

Case to show duty due to an official position

A

R v Dytham

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
6
Q

Case to show duty because D set in motion a chain of events

A

R v Miller

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
7
Q

What case defines intent?

A

R v Mohan

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
8
Q

What case shows direct intent?

A

R v Inglis

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
9
Q

What case shows oblique intention?

A

R v Woolin

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
10
Q

What is the case to show recklesness?

A

R v Cunningham

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
11
Q

What is the case to show transferred malice?

A

R v Latimer

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
12
Q

What case shows the coincidence of AR and MR?

A

Fagan

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
13
Q

What case shows the but for test?

A

R v White

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
14
Q

What is the case to show legal causation?

A

R v Hughes

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
15
Q

Case to show acts of a third party

A

R v Hughes

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
16
Q

Case to show the thin skull rule

A

R v Haywood

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
17
Q

Case to show someone refusing medical treatment

A

R v Blaue

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
18
Q

Case to show the victim’s acts breaking the chain of causation (doing something so silly)

A

R v Roberts

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
19
Q

What case defines ABH?

A

R v Miller

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
20
Q

What case shows psychiatric injury from ABH

A

R v Ireland

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
21
Q

What case shows the MR of ABH?

A

R v Roberts

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
22
Q

What case shows that consent is not a defence?

A

R v Donovan

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
23
Q

What case defines wounding (GBH S.20)

A

JCC v Eisenhower

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
24
Q

What case defines GBH?

A

DPP v Smith

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
25
Q

What case defines the MR of S.20?

A

R v Parmenter

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
26
Q

What case shows specific intent for S.18 GBH?

A

R v Belfon

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
27
Q

What case shows that resisting arrest can be intent? GBH

A

R v Morrison

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
28
Q

What case shows that murder has to cause death?

A

R v White

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
29
Q

What reference shows a fetus in the womb is a person in being

A

A-G Ref no.3 of 1994

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
30
Q

What case shows that brain dead means you aren’t a reasonable person in being?

A

R v Malcherek

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
31
Q

What case shows Express malice aforethought?

A

R v Moloney

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
32
Q

What case shows Implied malice aforethought?

A

R v Cunningham

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
33
Q

What case shows that drunk intent is still intent?

A

R v Sheehan and Moore

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
34
Q

What case shows voluntary intoxication?

A

DPP v Majewski

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
35
Q

What case shows involuntary intoxication?

A

R v Kingston

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
36
Q

What case shows intoxication by mistake?

A

R v O’Grady

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
37
Q

What case set out the rules of gross negligence?

A

R v Adomako

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
38
Q

What case shows a duty of care for gross negligence?

A

R v Evans

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
39
Q

What case shows gross negligence if there is a serious and obvious risk of death?

A

R v Misra and Sirvasava

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
40
Q

What case defines what ‘gross’ is?

A

R v Cooke

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
41
Q

What case shows that MR is irrelevant for gross negligence

A

AG ref No.2 of 1999

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
42
Q

What case defines ‘unlawful’ in unlawful manslaughter?

A

R v Lamb

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
43
Q

What case shows that unlawful act manslaughter must be an act not an omission

A

R v Lowe

44
Q

What case shows the unlawful act must be dangerous and set the test?

A

R v Church

45
Q

What case defines the MR of unlawful act manslaughter?

A

DPP v Newbury and Jones

46
Q

What case shows that robbery requires theft?

A

R v Zerei

47
Q

What case defines force for robbery?

A

R v Dawson and James

48
Q

What case shows that fear of force is enough when it comes to robbery?

A

B and R v DPP

49
Q

What case says that theft should be viewed in its entirety? Instead of jest before or at the time of

A

R v Hale

50
Q

What case defines assault?

A

Fagan v MPC

51
Q

What case shows that even silence can be assault?

A

R v Ireland

52
Q

What case shows that words can negate assault?

A

Tuberville v Savage

53
Q

What case defines force for battery?

A

Collins v Wilcock

54
Q

What case shows that even touching clothes can be battery?

A

R v Thomas

55
Q

What case shows indirect force can be battery?

A

R v Martin

56
Q

What case shows that force can be used if there if honest belief it was necessary

A

R v Gladstone and Williams

57
Q

What case says that reasonable force is an objective test?

A

R v Press and Thompson

58
Q

What case shows that self defence can’t be used if the danger has passed?

A

R v Clegg

59
Q

What case shows that people might not be able to weight to a nicety (not expected to work out the exact proportionate force) Self Defence

A

R v Palmer

60
Q

What case shows that a householder can use disproportionate force?

A

Denby Collins

61
Q

What case defines insanity?

A

M’Naughten

62
Q

What case shows a defect of reason?

A

R v Clarke

63
Q

What case shows a disease of mind?

A

Bratty v A-G

64
Q

What case shows that hypoglycemia is not a defence for insanity?

A

R v Quick

65
Q

What case shows that hyperglycemia is a defence for insanity?

A

R v Hennessy

66
Q

What case shows that insanity is not a defence if the defendant knew the nature of their act?

A

R v Oye

67
Q

What case defines automatist?

A

R v Smallshire

68
Q

What case shows that automatism must be an external cause?

A

Hill v Baxter

69
Q

What case shows that hypoglycemia is available for automatism?

A

R v Quick

70
Q

What case shows there has to be a total loss of voluntary control for automatism?

A

AG’s Ref No.2of 1992

71
Q

What case shows that automatism can’t be self induced?

A

R v Hardie

72
Q

What case defines what an ‘abnormality’ is for diminished responsibility?

A

R v Byrne

73
Q

What case shows a recognised medical condition for diminished responsibility?

A

R v Ahluwalia

74
Q

What case is an example of depression for diminished responsibility?

A

R v Gittens

75
Q

What case shows D must be substantially impaired for diminished responsibility?

A

R v Golds

76
Q

What case shows that voluntary intoxication is not an abnormality?

A

R v Di Duca

77
Q

What case shows you have to disregard alcohol in a diminished responsibility case?

A

R v Dietschmann

78
Q

What case shows that Alcohol Dependent Syndrome can be used in diminished responsibility?

A

R v Woods

79
Q

What case defines loss of control?

A

R v Jewell

80
Q

What case shows there has to be a fear of serious violence to use loss of control as a defence?

A

R v Dawes

81
Q

What cases shows that behaviour has to be out of extremely grave character? (loss of control)

A

R v Zebedee

82
Q

What case shows that sexual infidelity is not a valid trigger for loss of control?

A

R v Clinton

83
Q

What case shows that loss of control can’t be revenge?

A

R v Baillie

84
Q

What case shows that a person of similar age, sex, tolerance etc. would have done the same (loss of control)

A

R v Rejmanski

85
Q

What case shows that a criminal attempt must be more than merely prepatory

A

R v Campbell

86
Q

What case is an example of more than mere preparation?

A

R v Knight

87
Q

Case to show that a criminal attempt can only be intent, not recklessness

A

R v Mohan

88
Q

Case example of attempted murder?

A

R v Whybrow

89
Q

Case to show that you can still be charged for a crime even if it is an impossible crime

A

R v Shivupuri

90
Q

Case to define appropriation?

A

Corcoran v Anderton

91
Q

Case to show that you can appropriate property even with consent?

A

Lawrence v Commissioner for Metropolitan Police

92
Q

Case to show that confidential information cannot be stolen

A

Oxford v Moss

93
Q

Case to show that abandoned property can’t be stolen?

A

R v Small

94
Q

Case to show you can appropriate your own property (possession of control)

A

Turner

95
Q

Case to show that if an obligation to use property in a certain way is broken, that is theft

A

Davidge v Burnett

96
Q

What is the case for dishonesty (theft)

A

Barton & Booth

97
Q

Case to show that sometimes there is a belief you have a right to deprive

A

R v Bernhard

98
Q

Case to show that a person is not dishonest if they believe, reasonably or not, that they had a legal right to the property.

A

R v Holden

99
Q

Case to show that disposing of property can still be theft

A

R v Lavander

100
Q

Case to show that borrowing can be theft if the goodness or virtue of the item is lost

A

R v Lloyd

101
Q

Case to show conditional intent (stealing something then returning because they didn’t want it)

A

R v Easom

102
Q

What is the pharmacy example of strict liability?

A

Storkwain

103
Q

What is the case to show absolute liability?

A

R v Larsoneur

104
Q

Case to show no fault in strict liability

A

Callow v Tillstone

105
Q

Case example where the judge will presume means rea is needed if the Act of Parliament doesn’t make it clear

A

Sweet v Parsley

106
Q
A

Law paper 1 (8 decks)

Brainscape helps you reach your goals faster, through stronger study habits.
© 2024 Bold Learning Solutions. Terms and Conditions