CASES - Module 3 Flashcards
R v Deller (1952) 🚗💸
Actus reus (lack of) - Deller was charged with obtaining money under false pretenses; the conviction was quashed when it was discovered that he had the mens rea but not the actus reus of the offence
R v Dyson (1908) 👼🏾
Actus reus of murder, causation
R v Faulkner (1877) 🛳🕯🔥
Mens rea - defendant was convicted for “feloniously, unlawfully and maliciously” setting a ship on fire. He was attempting to steal cargo but accidentally lit a bottle of rum, causing a fire.
Hyam v DPP (1973) 🛢🗞🔥
Mens rea, murder
R v Moloney (1985) 🔫⚰️
Mens rea (lack of), murder mitigated to manslaughter
R v Pittwood (1902) 🚧🚇
Omission based on contractual duty, manslaughter
R v Adomako (1995) 👨🏾⚕️⚰️
Omission by virtue of holding office/professional responsibility, gross negligence manslaughter
R v Stone & Dobinson (1997) 👫👵🏾
Omission based on undertaking to care for another, manslaughter
R v Gibbins & Proctor (1918) 👫👧🏾⚰️
Omission by virtue of relationship (parents/persons in loco parentis), murder
R v Miller (1983) 🚬🛌🔥🏚
Duty to minimise own act, creating a dangerous situation, objective recklessness
R v Lewis (1970)
Consequences of one’s actions - D jumped from a window fearing her attacker A, assault - result foreseeable, causation
R v Paget & Pemberton (1983)
🧔🏾🛡🤰🏾⚰️
Consequences of one’s actions, causation, manslaughter
R v Blaue 🚫💉⚰️
Consequences of ones actions, thin skull rule, causation (no break in chain of causation), murder
R v Hancock & Shankland
Murder mitigated to manslaughter, mens rea (lack of) - probability of consequence, foresight of consequence
R v Nedrick (1986) 🛢📤
Muder mitigated to manslaughter, intention, foresight of consequences of actions & virtual certainty (decision of jury)
R v Cunningham (1959)
Subjective recklessness