CASES - Module 1 Flashcards

1
Q

R v Knuller (1972) 👬

A

conspiracy to corrupt public morals, conspiracy to outrage public decency

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
2
Q

Shaw v DPP (1962) 👯‍♀️

A

conspiracy to corrupt public morals

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
3
Q

Maharaj v AG of Trinidad and Tobago 🇹🇹

A

Constitutional protection of citizen’s rights, preservation of rule of law - a man must be told of the case being brought against him, judicial authority and rule of law

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
4
Q

Baptiste v Alleyne (1970) ✋🏾😵

A

Literal rule - statutory interpretation
(Hand through window choking female occupant. Literal rule provided that it would not be larcent, due to the Larceny Ordinance stating the person must “found in” the building)

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
5
Q

R v Ramsonahai and Duke (1961)

A

Literal rule - statutory interpretation (a conspiracy to prosecute vs causing a public prosecution)

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
6
Q

Davis v R (1962) 🚗🚫

A

Golden rule - statutory interpretation (parking in the wrong place vs parking in the wrong manner)

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
7
Q

R v George Green (1969) 🍁

A

Mischief/purposive rule (cultivation of pistilate vs staminate)

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
8
Q

R v Ramsonahai and Duke (1961) interpretation of the phrase “to prosecute” used in decision in The State v Sharma and Williams

A

Precedent

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
9
Q

R v Paraskwa (1983)

A

Role of the prosecution - conviction was quashed as the prosecution failed to disclose that the victim had previously been convicted for dishonesty

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
10
Q

R v McFadden and Cunningham (1976)

A

Role of defence counsel

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
11
Q

Forde v The Law Society

A

Discipline of lawyers - dishonoured cheques, professional misconduct

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
12
Q

Kaitamaki v R (1985) 🇳🇿

A

Rape, coincidence (ongoing act), judicial review

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly