Cases for Test Flashcards

1
Q

Appellant has burden to present record sufficient to show error.

A

Applegate v. Barnett Bank, 377 So. 2d 1150 (Fla. 1979).

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
2
Q

No transcript = affirmance

A

Applegate v. Barnett Bank, 377 So. 2d 1150 (Fla. 1979).

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
3
Q

Review of stay case

A

Sunbeam Television Corp. v. Clear Channel Metroplex (Fla. 3d DCA 2012)

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
4
Q

Eleventh Circuit revisiting it’s waiver jurisprudence.

A

U.S. v. Durham (11th Cir. 2015)

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
5
Q

Contemporaneous objection case and arguing same basis for objection on appeal.

A

Aills v. Boemi (Fla. 2010)

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
6
Q

Standard for reviewing stay on appeal.

A

Sunbeam Television Corp. v. Clear Channel Metroplex (Fla. 3d DCA 2012)

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
7
Q

Collateral order doctrine.

A

Digital Equip. Cor. v. Desktop Direct (1994)

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
8
Q

Tag-along jurisdiction to the Florida Supreme Court.

A

Jollie v. State (Fla. 1981)

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
9
Q

Express and direct conflict for Fla. Supreme Court review

A

Jenkins v. State (Fla. 1980)

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
10
Q

New harmless error standard.

A

Special v. W. Boca Medical Center (2014)

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
11
Q

Closing argument case, and review of fundamental error.

A

Murphy v. International Robotic Systems. (Fla. 2000)

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
12
Q

Fla. SC will not review extraordinary writs in the first instance if they raise substantial issues of fact.

A

Harvard v. Singletary (Fla. 1999)

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
13
Q

Essential elements of law explanation.

A

Allstate v. Kaklamanos (Fla. 2003)

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
14
Q

Should have confessed error.

A

Boca Burger, Inc. v. Forum (Fla. 2005)

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
15
Q

Requirement that a party object to improper comment and request curative and ask for mistrial.

A

Companioni v. City of Tampa (Fla. 2010)

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
16
Q

Tipsy coachman rule.

A

Dade County Sch. Bd. v. Radio Station WQBA (Fla. 1999)

17
Q

Punitive damages case.

A

Globe Newspaper Co. v. King, 658 So. 2d 518 (Fla. 1995)

18
Q

Prejudgment interest case.

A

Westgate Miami Beach Hotel v. Newport (Fla. 2010)