Cases Flashcards

1
Q

explain the DCHeller/Mcdonald vs Chicago and the ruling

A

This case overturned gun control laws in federal areas . Ruling the 2nd amendment gives all citizens the right to bear arms. 5-4 conservative block
conservative decision overturning state laws

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
2
Q

describe both the case and ruling of citizens united vs FEC

A

case looked at whether if spending by private groups can be restricted-No 5-4 conservative decision. also triple activist-overturns precedent, overturns an act of congress and goes beyond scope of the case.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
3
Q

describe both the case and ruling NFIB v sebelius

A

considered whether Obama care is unconstitutional as you’re making people buy something. Ruled unconstitutional 5-4 roberts was the swing. example of judicial restraint.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
4
Q

describe both the case and ruling of Arizona vs US

A

explored the constitutionality of Arizona’s show your papers law which intended to tackle concerns of illegal immigration. 5-3 decision (Kagan recused) Kennedy +Roberts join the liberals. activist as it’s overturning a state,

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
5
Q

describe both the case and ruling shelby county v holder

A

regarding the constitutionality of voting provisions certain states have to adhere to due to their past of voting discrimination. 5-4 conservative decision another example of triple activist - overturns supreme court, overturns executive and congress and has big impact.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
6
Q

describe both the case and ruling Obegerfell v Hodges

A

can Ohio ban gay marriage- 5-4 court ruled that the equal protection clause of the constitution guarantees the right to marriage for same sex couples-activist

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
7
Q

describe both the case and ruling whole women’s health v Hellerstedt

A

case against Texas and whether they can bring in provisions to prohibit abortion. 5-3 struck down on Oklahoma, Virginia, Wisconsin- case showed the importance of Kennedy

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
8
Q

describe both the case and ruling packingham v North Carolina

A

9-0 decision- overturns N Carolina statute which bands convicted sex offenders from accessing social media sites including Amazon, Facebook web MD, NY times, Washington post and YouTube. protets 1st amendment

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
9
Q

describe both the case and ruling of Snyder v phelps

A

Case was brought by father of Mathew Snyder(a soldier killed in Iraq) whose funeral was picketed by west borough baptist church. 8-1 decision in favour of the phelps. Scalia argues such unpleasantness infringed the rights of the family to bury their child showed how they’re willing to play like politicians

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
10
Q

describe both the case and ruling of Riley v California

A

Searching of smartphones and whether that requires a warrant 9-0 decision-that a warrant is required as digital information is covered by the 4th amendment

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
11
Q

describe both the case and ruling of Boumediene v Bush

A

Non US detainees in Guantanamo are entitled to a hearing in court-reaffirms previous decisions

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
12
Q

describe both the case and ruling of Moore v Texas

A

Reaffirmed Atkins v Virginia which ruled that the execution of any individual with a mental disability is unconstitutional- 5-3 Kennedy swing liberal victory

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
13
Q

describe both the case and ruling of Glossip v Gross

A

Upholds lethal injection as an acceptable form of the death penalty despite evidence of suffering. 5-4 conservative victory

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
14
Q

describe both the case and ruling of masterpiece cake shop v Colorado civil rights commission

A

Cake shop owner refused to bake a cake for a LGBTQ couple. Cake shop owner brought the case to the USSC 7-2 decision to the baker. SC tried to narrow their decision so not to give of the impression that a business can refuse service based on religious grounds

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
15
Q

describe both the case and ruling of fisher v Texas

A

Upholds the right of a university to have some consideration of race in admissions- 4-3 Kennedy swing

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly