Case Study-6 The Prison Flashcards

You may prefer our related Brainscape-certified flashcards:
1
Q

Background

What was the background of this study?

A

Background was that it was all focused on the individual (dispositional) VERSUS situational variable.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
2
Q

Back ground :
What is dispositional?
What is situational?

A

Dispositional the feature or characteristic located in an individual

Situational- behavior caused due to the feature or characteristic of a situation.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
3
Q

Aim

What was the aim?

A

Investigate whether the behavior of non prisoners in a stimulated prison environment is affected by their disposition than the situation they are in.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
4
Q

Method: setting
What was design of the setting?
Where
Corredor

A

Done in a basement corredor- Stanford University

Corredor was known as the yard

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
5
Q

Method: setting
Describe the cells?
What did they have ?

A

Three small cells
6x9 feet
Had a cot, one for each prisoner. Three prisioneira in one cell.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
6
Q

Method setting

Describe the hole?

A

Hole was a solitary confinement:

  • was a unit room
  • 2x2x7 feet
  • small broom cupboard
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
7
Q

Method setting

What were the other rooms for?

A

For other guards- bedroom for super intendente and Watson

Interviewing room

Room for recording equipment and observers

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
8
Q

Method setting

What else? (4)

A
  • no windows
  • no clocks
  • no constancy with outside world
  • was an entrance door
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
9
Q

Method

WHAT was the design of the prison?

A

All prionsers had to stay in there cells 24 hours

Guards worked 8 hours a day and had shift.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
10
Q

Method
Designs of guards? What did they wear? (5)
What effect did this have?

A
Khaki shirt
Khaki trousers 
Reflecting sunglasses 
Wooden baton
Whistle. 

Adapt role fully
Goes beyond their role
Guards even asked to do more shift as they liked to feel in control

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
11
Q

Method

Design of prisioners (6)

A
Muslim smock 
Identification number 
No underclothes 
Light chain on their ankle 
Rubber sandals 
Nylon stocking cap
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
12
Q

Participants

How many participants were there? lol

A

24 and two stand by.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
13
Q

Participants

What did they do, to choose all applicants

A

They gave the psychological interviews and tests to eliminate any
psychological problems,
medical issues and
collect family back grounds.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
14
Q

Participants
How did they find this?
How were participants selected.

A

Through an advertisement on newspaper advert.

Self selected sampling

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
15
Q

Participants

What did the contract include?

A
  • enough clothing
  • appropriate clothing
  • medical care
  • no psychical abuse
  • 15$ a day
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
16
Q

Participants
How were they deceived?
How were they informed

A

Didn’t know they were going to be arrested at home. And physical abuse

Little privacy as randomly assigned to guards or prisoners

17
Q

Procedure for the prisoner.

A
  1. Collected on a Sunday morning, at their houses, and were arrested for armed robbery.
  2. Read their own legal rights, were hand cuffed and researched.
  3. Driven off to a real police station in a Californian police car
  4. Once arrived were
    - stripped
    - given identification number
    - uniform
    - in cell
18
Q

Procedure for the guards.

A
  1. 11 guards met before, for a day of induction procedure.
  2. Were introduced to the research team. - Wadden and Zimbardo
  3. They were told that their goal was to create a prison environment that was reliable and ethical
  4. Main task ‘was to maintain a reasonable degree of order within the prison for its functioning.
  5. Somethings were not told as they wanted to see their attitudes.
19
Q

Prison procedure

A
  1. 9 guards 9 prisoners
  2. Guards would bring prisoners out of cell for counts. - lined against wall and ID number was read.
  3. Prisoners were given rules and had to know them.
  4. If prisoner tried to act independent their punishment was push-ups.
20
Q

Procedure

What did each prisoner have? (6)

A

3 meals a day
3 supervised toilet breaks
3 times a day were lined against wall

2 hours privilege
Two visiting prods
Work assignment

21
Q

Results
In general what was found ?
(3)

A
  1. State of prisoners is due to the situation they are in rather than the disposition hence dispositional hypothesis was not agreed.
  2. Guards will adopt an authoritative role and internalize it.
  3. Prisoners will follow the role given and suffer.
22
Q

Results

How did the results show pathology power ? (4)

A
  1. Guards liked to feel POWER
  2. Used psychological tactics

3 guards ripped prisoners naked

4 Called at any time of the day

23
Q

Results

How did the results show pathological prisoner syndrome

A
  1. Prioners reacted emotionally, proof was with a psychometric rash.
  2. Received sense of helplessness and usefulness
  3. Lost identity
24
Q

Results
Why did the study stop?
(2)

A

Guards:

  1. Guards were escalating the abuse of prionsers at night, when they thought no one was seeing them.
  2. Boredom also lead to this

Christina Maslack

  1. Was brought in to interview guards and prionsers.
  2. Period were she saw they walk away and saw the way they were being treated.
  3. Went into an emotional rage and told zimbardo for study to stop.
25
Q

Evaluation
Strengths
Essay

A

Strength: