Cardiology Trails Flashcards

1
Q

What did the EPHESUS trail show?

A

Eplerenone vs. placebo
-15% RRR in deaths
-16% RRR in CV death or hospitalization for CV events
-8% RRR in death from any cause or any hospitalization
-21% RRR in sudden death from cardiac causes
-Increased risk of serious hyperkalaemia
————————————
6500 patients
Double blind multi center RCT

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
2
Q

What did the COMMIT trial show?

A

2005
45,000 patients
Double-blinded multi-center RCT
————————————–
Refuted earlier controversial trial (ISIS-1) which claimed to show benefit of atenolol within 24hrs MI (unblinded trial). Better to wait now before starting B-blockers.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
3
Q

What did the CURRENT-OASIS trial show?

A

2010
25086 patients
Double-blinded multi-center RCT

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
4
Q

What did the TRITON-TIMI-38 trial show?

A
Prasugrel superior to clopidogrel in ACS scheduled for PCI
----------------------------
2007
13600 patients
Randomised, blinded
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
5
Q

What did the TRILOGY-ACS trial show?

A

2012
9000 patients
Randomized, double-blind, double-dummy, active-control, event-driven trial

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
6
Q

What did the CURE trail show?

A
Proved benefit of clopidogrel added to aspirin in NSTEMI/UA
--------------------------------
2001
12500 patients
Double-blinded multi-center RCT
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
7
Q

What did the CADILLAC trial show?

A
Abciximab reduces mortality and thrombosis/TVR in addition to ticlodipine/aspirin in PCI
------------------------------------
2003
2082 patients	
Double-blinded multi-center RCT
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
8
Q

What did the IMPROVE-IT trial show?

A

2015

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
9
Q

What did the OASIS-6 trial show?

A

2006

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
10
Q

What did the NORDISTEMI trial show?

A

2010

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
11
Q

What did the PROVE-IT trial show?

A

2004

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
12
Q

What did the ISIS-3 trial show?

A

UFH no benefit added to aspirin without PCI. 3 thrombolysis agents similar (streptokinase, tPA, alteplace)

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
13
Q

What did the AFFIRM trial show?

A

Rate control non-inferior to rhythm control and possibly superior in elderly and co-morbid patients.
Anticoagulation is beneficial even in rate control
————————-
2002

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
14
Q

What did the RACE-II trial show?

A

2010

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
15
Q

What did the ARISTOTLE trial show?

A

2011

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
16
Q

What did the ROCKET-AF trial show?

17
Q

What did the ATHENA and PALLAS trials show?

A

Dronedarone may be beneficial in low-risk paroxysmal or persistant AF patients (ATHENA) but appears harmful in higher risk patients (PALLAS) - e.g. stopped early as it killed patients

18
Q

What did the HOPE trial show?

19
Q

What did the ONTARGET trial show?

20
Q

What did the SATURN trial show?

21
Q

What did the ASCERT trial show?

22
Q

What did the CONSENSUS trial show?

23
Q

What did the SOLVD trial show?

24
Q

What did the CHARM trial show?

25
What did the CIBIS-II trial show?
Bisoprolol improved mortality in NYHA 3-4 --------------------------- 1999
26
What did the COMET trial show?
Carvedilol superior to metoprolol reducing mortality in NYHA II+ & EF <35% (e.g. there is some difference in outcome with b-blocker choice) -------------------------- 2003
27
What did the MADIT-CRT trial show?
CRT (added to ICD) reduced CCF exasc in well low EF patients -------------------------------- ICD-CRT (vs. ICD alone): -41% (significant) reduction in heart-failure exascerbations (ARR 8.9%) --Similar benefits for ischaemic & non-ischaemic cardiomyopathy -Significant reduction in LV volume & EF improvement -Similar risks of death (3%/yr) -Greatest benefit when QRS > 150ms ----------------------------- 2009
28
What did the SCD-HeFT trial show?
``` ICD in NYHA II/III reduced mortality; amiodarone did not ------------------------------- ICD -Significantly increase survival -RRR 23%, ARR 7.2% at 5yr ``` Amiodarine -No benefit to survival -------------------------------- 2005
29
What did the DIG trial show?
Digoxin reduced CCF hospitalisation but not mortality ----------------------------------- Digoxin (+-ACE/diuretic) vs. placebo (+-ACE/diuretic) -No difference in mortality (RR 0.99; p=0.8) -Reduced hospitalisation for HF (RR 0.72; p<0.001) -6% fewer all-cause hospitalisation (p=0.01) Ancillary trial (EF > 45% - \"diastolic HF\") -No difference in mortality -Similar trend towards reduce hospitalisation ------------------------------- 1997
30
What did the BEAUTIFUL trial show?
Overall: Ivabradine beneficial in angina 7 HR > 70; see SHIFT ----------------------------- Very detailed trial with a lot of outcomes: ------------------------------- Patients with HR > 70 showed increased: -Risk for cardiovascular death -Admission to hospital for heart failure -Admission to hospital for myocardial infarction -Coronary revascularisation Risks increased for all every 5 bpm --------------------------------- Subgroup analysis on patients with angina as limiting symptom at baseline (13.8%) -Ivabradine associated with 24% reduction in primary endpoint --(CV mortality, MI or CCF hospitalisation) ``` In those with angina & HR > 70 -73% reduction in hospitalization for MI -59% reduction in coronary revascularization ------------------------------ 2008 - 2009 ```
31
What did the CARRESS-HF trial show?
Ultrafiltration inferior to diuretics in cardiorenal syndrome ------------------------------- Ultrafiltration vs. stepped pharmacologic therapy in cardiorenal syndrome -Increased serum creatinine at 96hrs (P=0.003) -No significant difference in weight loss -Increased serious adverse events Pharmacologic therapy included continuous infusion of diuretics +-metolazone +-vasoactive therapy ------------------------------- 2012