Calvin’s Sensus Divinitatis Flashcards

1
Q

Q: What would humans be able to do if natural theology was valid?

A

A: Humans would be able to know God’s existence or God’s morality through their own efforts.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
2
Q

Q: Why does Barth argue that natural theology would make revelation unnecessary?

A

A: Because if humans could know God’s existence or morality through their own efforts, then there would be no need for divine revelation.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
3
Q

Q: What does the necessity of revelation imply about the validity of natural theology?

A

A: The necessity of revelation, evidenced by God sending Jesus, implies that natural theology cannot be valid.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
4
Q

Q: What does Aquinas insist about his natural theology in relation to faith?

However, Aquinas insists

A

A: Aquinas insists that his natural theology does not undermine faith but instead supports it.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
5
Q

Q: What is the purpose of Aquinas’ arguments for God’s existence?

However, Aquinas insists

A

A: To show the reasonableness of belief in God and to provide evidence for some kind of God, not to replace faith.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
6
Q

Q: Why did Aquinas reject the Ontological argument?

However, Aquinas insists

A

A: Aquinas rejected the Ontological argument because, as an a priori deductive argument, it sought to prove God’s existence, which he worried would replace faith.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
7
Q

Q: What is required in addition to natural law ethics to gain divine law, according to Aquinas?

However, Aquinas insists

A

A: Revelation is required in addition to natural law ethics to gain divine law.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
8
Q

Q: What type of reasoning does Aquinas use to provide evidence for a designer or necessary being?

However, Aquinas insists

A

A: Aquinas uses a posteriori reasoning to provide evidence for a designer or necessary being.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
9
Q

Q: What is needed to know the Christian God in particular exists, according to Aquinas?

However, Aquinas insists

A

A: Faith is needed to know that the Christian God in particular exists.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
10
Q

Q: How does the knowledge from natural theology compare to revealed theology?

However, Aquinas insists

A

A: The knowledge from natural theology is not the same as revealed theology and cannot replace or undermine it.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
11
Q

Q: What is the role of reason according to Aquinas in relation to faith?

However, Aquinas insists

A

A: The role of reason is to support faith, not to make revealed theology unnecessary.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
12
Q

Q: Why doesn’t the Bible contain reasoned arguments for God, according to Aquinas?

However, Aquinas insists

A

A: Because the goal is to maintain faith, and reasoned arguments like those Aquinas provides are only meant to show the reasonableness of belief in God.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
13
Q

Q: What does Aquinas’ natural theology provide in terms of evidence?

However, Aquinas insists

A

A: It provides evidence that a designer or necessary being exists, supporting faith but not replacing it.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly