Called Out My Name Flashcards
Pros of a codified constitution
- Clearly outlines the laws and principals of a government
- Constitucional laws are harder to change, protecting democracy
- Courts can use the constitution to base their decision off
Cons of a codified constitution
- Because it’s entrenched, it makes it hard to change, even when necessary
- Unelected judges often have significant power to interpret the constitution
- Codified constitution will not always be clear
Pros of a uncodified constitution
- It can evolve over time, allowing laws to adapt over societal change
- Parliamentary sovereignty ensures the elected government can make changes to the law without restrictions
- Government can quickly respond to emergencies
Cons of an uncodified constitution
- Because it’s not written in one single document, some of the public may find it hard to interpret it
- Without a bill of rights individual liberties are not guaranteed
- A government with a parliamentary majority can easily change constitutional principals
Entrenchment
Process of making certain laws or constitutional principals difficult to change
Pros of the Westminster model
- ruling party often has a majority giving them power to rule effectively
- regular elections allow public scrutiny
- ensures the party with the most votes governs without influence of smaller, more radical, parties
Cons of Westminster model
- single party majority can lead to tyrannical-like ruling
- FPTP ignores minority
- House of Lords
What is a unitary state
A country where all power is held by the central government
What is the UK constitution
It’s uncodified, not written down in a single document. Instead made of various sources, including laws, conventions and traditions
What is the UK constitution based of
Historical documents such as the Magna Carta (1215), Bill Of Rights (1689) & Act of Settlement (1701)
What are the UK constitution main sources of power
- parliamentary sovereignty
- the monarchy
- the rule of law
- democratic legitimacy