C7 autobiographical memory Flashcards
What are autobiographical memories?
Memories of life events that seem to make up who we are (self defining)
Complex memories, different sensory inputs, engage many different processes in the brain at retrieval;
Give our lives continuity and help us integrate with other people;
Very sensitive to brain injury (distortion, amnesia);
Self-defining memories that changed life direction (e.g. an experience with a good teacher that inspired a career choice);
Can be dysfunctional, pathological (e.g. PTSD).
AM across the lifespan
AM are complex and take effort to maintain and recall.
Can pop out in response to cues - relevant to the conversation or intrusive thoughts like PTSD
The working self
Conway and Pleydell-Pearce (2000) suggest the working self is a cognitive structure that controls when autobiographical memories are recalled or inhibited
Develops across the lifespan
It is made up of a goal hierarchy of active goals and a set of self-conceptions (how we see ourselves);
The self profoundly affects which autobiographical memories are constructed, retained and made accessible by the working self;
Autobiographical memories are more likely to be formed during periods in which the self changes because self-defining memories are more likely to come from these periods;
These goals and self-conceptions directly affect how what we experience in the present is encoded into memories.
It emerges in early infancy and Erikson and Erikson linked the relationship between the working self and autobiographical memory to the changes that happen across the lifespan
Changes in this relationship stabilise in adolescence/early adulthood;
The number of autobiographical memories that can be accessed is shown in a lifespan retrieval curve, where adults around 50 years typically:
cannot access early infant autobiographical memories and only a few in later years (< 10 years) - childhood amnesia;
can recall high numbers of memories from 10-30 years (peak at 20-25 years) - reminiscence bump;
can recall high numbers in recent years - recency effect.
Childhood amnesia
Young children (as young as 30 months) do have autobiographical memories but these become inaccessible;
This is not due to general development in intellect, language etc. as they were accessible before this development;
There isn’t a generally accepted explanation for why adults can’t access childhood autobiographical memories but:
Conway and Pleydell-Pearce suggest the working self goal hierarchy changes, and the adult working self is unable to access childhood goal hierarchy because it is so different.
It could also be that the child episodic memories are so emotionally saturated that the adult working self couldn’t cope with them so actively limits them
The reminiscence bump
This surge in autobiographical memories between 10 and 30 years can only be detected if remembering is open (free recall) and unbiased (not cued), and care must be taken to ensure rememberers don’t ‘get stuck’ remembering lots from a particular time.
Autobiographical memories show this peak, but so do other types of autobiographical knowledge such as films, songs and public events.
Reminiscence bump memories are more salient and accurate/detailed than other memories, and are judged by the rememberer as more important.
The memories recalled tend to be specific to individual rememberers - no general themes such as first-time experiences, or experiences that were more pleasant or ‘better’ than in other parts of the lifespan;
Two possible explanations have been proposed for why memories in this lifestage are easier to recall:
Rubin (2002) proposed a ‘novelty hypothesis’ whereby times in which many changes occur lead to fuller memory encoding;
Conway and Pleydell-Pearce (2000) suggest that many experiences between 10-30 years are self-defining, and because they define identity and are new and unique for the self, they assume high importance.
Recency
The recency effect can be explained in terms of more recent experiences simply being easier to recall and less recent ones being forgotten.
Forgetting less recent memories might be due to them being attenuated because they’re less relevant to the self.
Autobiographical knowledge, episodic memory, the working self, memory construction
Two important aspects -
Distribution across the lifespan as demonstrated by the lifespan retrieval curve
the fact that we have to construct autobiographical memories from conceptual autobiographical knowledge, generic images and episodic memories
Cabeza et al (PAPER) Example: “the last time you had Chinese food” requires that you try to remember things about your own life (where you usually go to eat/buy it, who you go with) as well as semantic facts (what kinds of food are “Chinese”, where are the local restaurants). Once you find an event that might fit you may recollect emotions to do with the event, or sensory memories (visual, smell, taste). You might mis-remember some details, such as thinking you were with particular people - monitoring processes try to detect these errors.
Autobiographical knowledge
Conway and Pleydell-Pearce proposed two kinds of autobiographical knowledge: general events and lifetime periods.
Autobiographical knowledge - general events
single events
recurring events
extended events
can be grouped - a group experience (holidays)
can take emotional, verbal or image forms, but they are most often image-based.
This autobiographical knowledge can be used to access sensory-perceptual episodic memories in order to form an autobiographical memory which in turn will often contain generic images.
Autobiographical knowledge - lifetime periods
more conceptual than event specific - less concrete compared to general events
can contain representations for times, places, people, activities, goals and emotions.
Memories of “first-time” events can create long-lasting evaluations of the self by cueing other memories
Bluck and Habermas referred to the life story, a set of themes that describe a person’s life. These themes are made up of life story schemas that link autobiographical knowledge. (going to uni/becoming independent)
These schemas form the basis for lifetime period evaluations, such as “I was academically successful”, and themes such as “I’m a more academic than practical person
Tulving - episodic and semantic memory
Tulving (1972) proposed that:
episodic memory contains personal spatio-temporal memories (specific times and places) but semantic memory contains social context-free facts
However fractionating LTM into episodic and semantic memory like this is problematic
Episodic memories must contain semantic knowledge, so how can we tell where one ends and the other begins
Some semantic memories contain spatio-temporal information like episodic memories, e.g. knowledge of “breakfast” includes where and when it’s eaten
Autobiographical knowledge can contain spatio-temporal knowledge (you went on holiday last year)
Tulving now suggests episodic memories are those recollective memories that make you feel that you’re experiencing the past
Episodic memory
contains unique past events, contextual details and autonoetic consciousness
Semantic memory
concerns facts about the world, or noetic consciousness
Autobiographical memory
consists of both episodic and semantic contents, the amounts are affected by age of memories, event frequency, rehearsal, age and mental health of participants.
Redefining episodic memory
Conway tried to redefine episodic memory to address these issues:
Proposed that it is a repository of mainly sensory-perceptual rather than spatio-temporal knowledge about recent experiences (“experience-near”) over relatively short timescales;
If these memories are linked to autobiographical knowledge they endure; if not they are forgotten.
For example events from today are fresh in memory but only those events from weeks ago that are linked to previous autobiographical knowledge are still remembered.