C2 PARLIAMENT 2 Flashcards
what defeats did Ts face 2019-24 in HoC vs in HoL
- 300+ in HoL
- no defeats in formal bills, only 4 defeats on minor issues in HoC
what happened w fox hunting in HoC vs HoL?
- 2004, hol blocked lab’s attempt to ban fox hunting, yet hoc passed the ban into law a year later anyway; invoking 1949 pa act
how was hol assertive in 2015?
- infamously defeated govs bill which attempted to cut tax credits for those on low incomes
how much has hol defeated gov bills since 1979?
- 1979-1997- 241 times
- 1997-2010- 528 times
when have hol ignored salisbury convention?
- 2005, blocked lab’s Identity Cards Bil, even tho this was in lab’s pre-election manifestow
what key difference lies between hoc & hol?
- hol usually seeks to make up for the weaknesses of the hoc in order to prevent an elective dictatorship
- hoc has greater input legit, so should be left to challenge gov instead of hol in minority gov as easier to block bills & force concessions out of them
what is parliamentary privilege?
- MPs are free to speak w/o fear of prosecution for slander; means MPs and life peers can call gov to accoount w/o being constrained
how is the work of BBs on public bill committees limited?
- party whips decide which BBs sit on these PBCs… who are then usually loyal to their P leaders
- gov usually has a maj on these
what crit is often made of backbenchers?
- ‘just lobby fodder’
across a year, what time is given to BBs in hoc timetable?
- 35 days to backbenchers business committee to decide topics for debate
- 20 days to opposition Ps
- 13 fridays given for consideration of private members bills
how is BBs scrut limited by PMQs?
- criticised as being abt political point scoring & select committees they sit on cannot force subpoena
how has the amount of urgent questions changed?
- more frequently, asked of gov ministers
- prev speaker John Bercow allowed 3547 UQs between 2009-13, more thn 2x amount by predecessor
- still historicaly high under L Hoyle
- so BBs more able to scrut
how does the BBBC increase debate/ infl of BBs?
- 35 days of year
- some subjects chosen in response to e petitions w over 100,000 sigs
- so reps public’s views
- eg 2011, BBBC org a debate on uk’s membership of EU, against wishes of gov; was watched by over half a million ppl; argueably contributed to gov promising ref on issue
how did brexit impact BBs’ imp?
- 2016-19, hugely increased infl
- mostly down to T’s min status in chamber
- br= such a contentious issue, BBs on all sides willing to obey P leaders & whips
- succesfully voted against gov to take control over the parliamentary timetable (1st time taken away from gov ever); to prevent BJ forcing through br leg w/o their scrut
- passed EUROPEAN WITHDRAWAL BILL 2019, against BJ’s wishes; forced BJ to write letter to EU seeking extension to br dedline, even though BJ adament he didnt want this; this broke w convention that pa should defer to the gov on foreign policy matters
what are roles of the official opposition?
- largest P not in gov
- scrut gov, hold it to account, force it to justify its policies
- highlight shortcomings in gov
- leader gets to ask 6 Qs at PMQs
- determine parliamentary business (issues to debate, bills to consider) on 17/20 days of the opposition days on the timetable
- highest chairs of Scommittees- eg always chairs public acount C
examples of T’s alternative proposals as official opposition?
- minimal
- reverse VAT on priv schls
- RJ sugg of leaving ECHR
what is ministerial question time/ oral questions?
- QT takes place for an hour on mondays, tuesdays, wednesdays & thursdays after prayers]
- dif gov depts answer Qs according to a rota & Qs must relate to dept concerned
what are written Qs to ministers?
- MPs & peers can ask
- often used to obtain detailed info abt dept stats / policies
- ministers are duty-bound to respond to these
why are PMQs sometimes called?
- Gardener’s Questions
- as Qs planted by leaders/ P
how are PMQs effective?
- bring ministers face-to-face- forces direct involvement]- regular- weds at noon for 30mins
- vs liaison committee only 2xpa
- whilst may be theatrical/ abt sound-bites, this brings media attention to PMQs; thus public focus, enhancing scrut of gov
- other foreign gov leaders don’t have to face such intense Qs from opp eg George Bush infamously feel glad abt not having to face them liek john major
- forces PM to be aware of everything gping on in gov in case theyre asked abt it
how are PMQs ineffective?
- political point-making / headlines/ sound-bites
- misrep of what pols are like- bad public image/ r-ship
- PMs become skilled at not answering Qs#
- planted Qs (gardeners) make PM look good
- too short esp in comparison to SCs that carry out investigations for months
- ‘punch & judy politics’
what maj did johnson have 2019?
- 80 seat