C2 PARLIAMENT Flashcards
what reforms have changed the makeup of the house of lords?
- 1958 LIFE PEERAGES ACT- intro life peers rather than purely hered
- 1999 HOL REFORM ACT- got rid of all but 92 hered peers
- planned lab leg to remove all of these & make peers retire at 80 years old
- (this all gives hol more output legit)
name 4x examples of life peers?
- Lord WINSTON- on science & tech committee- useful for health/ science
- Lord HOGAN HOWE- former head of met police
- Lord MARTIN REEVES- astrophysicist
- Lord VALLENCE- former chief scientific officer- key advisor to gov on managing covid-19
what reforms have changed powers of House of Lords?
- 1911 Parl Act; meant HoL could only delay a bill being passed by two yeras before HoC could bypass hol and put law ino effect
- used to be able to reject outright any bill
- 1949 Parl Act reduced this to 1 year
- 1945ish comes Salisbury Convention; HoL should not v against bills that were cpntained in gov’s manifesto
who did boris johnson appoint as a life peer?
- his brother- nepotism
- Peter Druddas (cronyism)
what are the main purposes of parliament/
- legislating
- scrutiny
- representation
- legitimation
how does parliament perform legitimation effectively?
- recent PMs have given HoC to lelgitimise military action taken abroad- previously a prerogative right of the monarch
- began in 2003, w TB allowed hoc to v on whether uk should join us military intervention in iraq (approved)
- coalition in 2013 also asked hoc to vote on whether to approve action against the syrian regime, which the house voted against despit the gov supporting it- shows power of hoc
how is legitimation performed ineffectively by parliament?
- uncodified const mean the powers of hoc in relation to gov are not clearly set out
- eg 2018 TM joined american led assaults on syrian regime w/o consulting hoc; lab leader JC crit it as ‘flagrant disregard’ of the legitimation role of hoc
- hol has no power to legitimate secondary leg (made by ministers as changes to acts of pa by ‘statutory instruments’
- crit of recent govs of trying to ‘govern from the shadows’, making major leg changes by statutory instruments, w/o them being given the same legitimation as a primary act of parl
what types of bills are proposed & passed into statute law?
- government bill- bills intr in pa by gov- almost all bills that get debated in pa
- PMBs- intro by indiv MP ormemebrs of the lords- v few usually get passed into law, & those that do usually need gov supp/votes to back it eg assissted dying bill 2024 by kim leadbeater
- only 13 fridays each year devoted to priv members bills
what are the stages of the legislative process?
- first reading
- second reading- v to take to next stage
- public bill comitteee- scrut by a committe esp est, suggests amendments
- report stage- bill & amendments debated & voted on
- third reading- further debated, transferred to other chamber, where same stages repeat
- royal assent- once passed by hol &hoc
what can MPs do to restrain gov power in legislating?
- rebel against party whips- so gov is constrained in what bills it can pass
give 2x examples of gov being defeated in bills (legislation of pa effective)?
- 2005; TB’s gov plans to extend te detention of terrorist suspects to 90 day was defeated in hoc (his first defeat since 1997)
- 2016; DC’s gov lost vote on bill to reform Sunday Trading Laws (courtesy of SNP v against even though it only affected eng)
when (PMs) has parliament been effective in legislating, due to minority govs?
- 2017-19, TM defeated record 33 times, mostly on brexit
- 2019, july-december, BJ defeated 12x, mostly on br again
give four signif private members’ bills that passed?
- 2017 Homeless Reduction Act, prop by tory BB Bob Blackman
- 2023 Firearms Act prop by tory BB Shaun Bailey; tightened restrictions on gun ownership
- 2023 Shark Fins Act, prop by lab BB Christina Rees; prohibited M & X of shark fins in UK
- 2024 Assissted Dying Bill prop by Kim Leadbeater (lab BB)
why are defeats of gov on bills v rare?
- FPTP + WB’s; govs usually ejoy large majs
- w large maj, can use whips to ensure mps v for their side, impossible to be outvoted on matters they strongly beleive in
- public bill committee stage is key stage; membership of these dominated by gov party & members are selected by arty whips; so these don’t provide effective scrutiny, as loyal P members follow leader’s instructions
example of parliament being ineffective at legislating due to maj gov?
- TB’s gov not defeated for first 8 years in office
what legislative consequence is there of gov dominance, showing parl is ineffective at legislating?
- some ill-thought through bills make it into law
- eg in rush to get its business done, 2017 tory gov passed 13 bills on the last day parl was open before the 2017 election- 54% of total bills gov passed after 2015 GE- being rushed shows a gov is confident it willl face little challenge in pa; means bills will not be subject to serious scrut
how many PMBs acctually pass into law?
- 5%; theyre only eveer successfull when able to persuade gov on their side
how is parliament ineffective at legislating in general?
- gov dominate leg process, partucularly due to hol reforms
- all these are mechanisms behind ELECTIVE DICTATORSHIP
how is scrutiny a function of parliament?
- overseeing & investigating the work of gov and its decsions- holding gov to account
- public bill committees
- select committees
- public accounts committee
- liaison committee
what are select committees?
- usually abt 11 members, from range of dif parties, who scrut gov’s work, usually linked to a specific gov dept, eg Health & Social Care Committee, Education Select Committee, Home Affairs Select Committee
- carry out inquries, write reports, can Q ministers & ask to see gov papers
- reports published often recieve lots of publicity; prompt gov into action
what is the public accounts committee?
- assesses gov spending to ensure the uk taxpayer is getting their money;s worth
- always headed by a senior figure from an opposition party eg now= Sir Geoffery Clinton Brown, cons MP
what is the liaison committee?
- chairs of all other select committees- senior, experienced BBs w departmental expertise
- Q PM 2x pa for several hours
what are the Wright reforms?
- mean chairs & indiv members of select committees chosen by wider hoc not gov; so more indep
- also increased chairs’ salaries, so higher caliber MPs willing to persue gov scrut as career path ratehr than being in gov
how does ‘parliamentary privilege’ help select committees?
- mean MPs in them can ask minister the most libelous Qs w/o fear of prosecution