C - OSFI Earthquake Flashcards
OSFI EARTHQUAKE
3 EQ coverages offered in Canada
SHAKE INSURANCE
- -as an endorsement
- -covering property and content
FIRE FOLLOWING AN EQ
– as an endorsement
TSUNAMI FOLLOWING AN EQ
- -impact limited to coast
- -but enormous destructive power
- -may or may not be provided
OSFI EARTHQUAKE
Define
Risk Appetite
Risk Tolerance
–risk appetite–
QUALITATIVE ASSESSMENT
total level and type of exposure an insurer is willing to take to achieve business objectives
–risk tolerance–
Limit on level and AMOUNT of risk an insurer is willing to accept (for each relevant risk)
OSFI EARTHQUAKE
Define PML (Probable Maximum Loss)
Define PML in the context of probabilistic models
Define Gross PML
Define Net PML
Threshold $ value of loss above which loss caused by a major EQ are unlikely.
$ value of loss expected to be exceeded once in every X years
PML (after deductible, but before reinsurance)
PML (after deductible, after reinsurance)
OSFI EARTHQUAKE
5 factors on which EQ exposure risk management for a company should depend.
TRUC : Qu’est-ce qui serait une catastrophe? CONSR!
- Corporate Strategy
- Ownership
- Nature
- Size
- Risk Profile
OSFI EARTHQUAKE
3 good corporate governance (risk management techniques) for EQ risk
- AVOID risk
- MITIGATE risk
- TRANSFER risk
OSFI EARTHQUAKE
Contrast :
Board, Sr Management and Actuarial responsibilities
on
EQ exposure risk management policy
Board
Oversight and Ensure Policy is effectively implemented
Sr Management
- Responsible for IMPLEMENTING the policies
- Exposure management should be an ongoing process
Actuarial
- review models used to determine exposures
- adequacy of reinsurance
- pricing of EQ insurance
OSFI EARTHQUAKE
BOARD responsibilities about EQ policies and risk management?
- Ensure Controls are in place to monitor the effectiveness
- OVERSEE the development of EQ policies and ensure they are correctly IMPLEMENTED
- REVIEW AND DISCUSS in annual review of CAT risk Management.
OSFI EARTHQUAKE
5 key principles in managing EQ risk.
1) EQ-EXPOSURE RISK MGMT
oversight by Board, implemented by Sr Mgmt
2) EQ-EXPOSURE DATA
captured and tested for consistency, accuracy, completeness
3) EQ MODELS
user must understand their AML (assumptions, methods, limitations)
4) PML
must consider data quality, non-modeled exposures, model uncertainty and exposure to multiple regions
5) FINANCIAL RESOURCES AND CONTINGENCY PLAN
adequate to manage through major EQ
OSFI EARTHQUAKE
items that should be included the EQ policies and procedures.
- RISK APPETITE and RISK TOLERANCE for EQ insurance
- Data Mgmt practices
- EXPOSURE AGGREGATION Monitoring and reporting
- Estimation of PLM factors
- Adequacy of financial resources in relation to PML
- Contingency Plan
- Consideration of potential increase in operating costs.
OSFI EARTHQUAKE
4 methods to improve the appropriateness, completeness and accuracy of the DATA COLLECTION of EQ data
- Score data quality at time of UW
- Delete sources with inadequate data
- Implement safeguards to prevent miscoding
- Invest in technology to improve data quality
OSFI EARTHQUAKE
OSFI’s expectation on DATA VERIFICATION in EQ Risk Mgmt
- Insurers verify that their DBs capture all data received
- Reinsurers have processes to ensure quality of data received by cedent.
- Perform an aggregate analysis of overall data quality
OSFI EARTHQUAKE
Role of Sr Mgmt in case of data limitation in EQ exposures
- to understand impact of data limitations on projections (and adjust with prudence)
- to review data annually by independent individuals
- to address concerns identified in reviews
- to select a time frame to update data and model results
OSFI EARTHQUAKE
3 methods to TEST the completeness, accuracy and consistency of EQ exposure data.
1) summarize data by occupancy, construction, geocode
2) compare YoY exposure chg and compare with historical data
3) use historical experience to identify coding issues vs model constructions
4) run data quality sensitivity tests and incorporate them in risk decision making
OSFI EARTHQUAKE
***7 BEST Practices for EQ Modeling
DOCUMENT
document use of model within Risk Mgmt program (ex. for measuring and monitoring exposures)
ALTERNATIVES
explain why a particular model is used vs alternatives
QUALIFIED
qualified employees runs in-house models regularly
KNOWLEDGE
must have knowledge of AML (ASSUMPTIONS, METHODOLOGIES, LIMITATIONS) of EQ model
DATA
should provide evidence that granularity and quality of data is appropriate
UNCERTAINTY
understand the impact of uncertainty on capital adequacy and reinsurance requirements
PMLs if PML(model1) <> PML(model2) then must explain differences and any subsequent model adjustments
OSFI EARTHQUAKE
3 sound practices for:
EQ MODEL VERSIONS
EQ MODEL VALIDATION
- -eq model versions–
1) CONSIDER USE OF MORE THAN ONE MODEL
2) WHEN USING VENDOR SOFTWARE, UNDERSTAND THE MODEL, USE and LIMITATIONS
3) FOR IN-HOUSE MODELS, REGULAR UPDATE AND TEST PML REGULARLY against other commercial models.
- -eq model validation–
1) ensure model prudently capture risk based on actual events
2) compare few major historical EQ to model and assess difference
3) compare the modeled tail losses to market price for reinsurance coverage
4) process should be documented