C - Feldblum Flashcards
FELDBLUM
2 types of ratings provided by Rating Agencies.
For each, give one example of rating agency.
CREDIT RATING FOR BONDS
Standard and Poor’s, Moody’s
FINANCIAL STRENGTH RATINGS
for life and PC insurers (AM BEST)
-the focus of Feldblum article
FELDBLUM
1) Purpose of FINANCIAL STRENGTH RATING?
2) What does it helps to assess?
3) Give example of its uses for REINSURERS?
1) to make insurance market more efficient by reducing information costs
2) ABILITY TO MEET OBLIGATIONS of
insurer
3) Reinsurers may need investment grade ratings TO RETAIN CONSUMERS. Independent agents use ratings TO PLACE POLICIES WITH HIGHER RATED INSURERS
FELDBLUM
3 disadvantages of unrated insurers.
independent AGENTS HESITATE TO USE UNRATED insurers
some BANKS DO NOT ISSUE MORTGAGE without property coverage from a rated insurer
insurers who do not pay for interactive ratings MAY RECEIVE PUBLIC RATING, WHICH HAS LESS CONTROL over the information reviewed by the agencies and greater chances of errors.
FELDBLUM
2 examples testifying of the public acceptance of insurance ratings.
1) INSURERS are willing to pay large amounts to keep high ratings
2) AGENTS AND INVESTORS base business decisions on these ratings
FELDBLUM
discuss INTERACTIVE MEETING by which the rating analysts meet with the sr. mngmnt of the insurer.
Rating analyst will meet officer responsible for U/W, Reserving, Reinsurance, Investments, Risk Management
Rating Agency’s focus is the quality of an insurer’s managers : their knowledge of industry trends, their experience with adverse scenarios, their handling of current problems
Insurer select the info they provide to the rating agency. Agency avoids specifying the data they want. They evaluate their client : DECEPTIVE, MISLEADING, INCOMPLETE INFO may lead to poor rating.
FELDBLUM
5 steps of an interactive rating
- BACKGROUND RESEARCH by rating analyst and SUBMISSION OF DATA by the insurer
- Interactive MEETINGS between RATING ANALYST and SENIOR MANAGER.
- Preparation of RATING PROPOSAL by lead analyst and submission of add’t data by insurer
- DECISION by the RATING COMMITTEE after presentation by the lead analyst.
- PUBLICATION OF RATING on public web sites and provision of analysis to fee-paying subscribers.
FELDBLUM
An insurer with a $200M market value has $800M of bonds with average durations of 6 1/2 years.
Contrast RATING AGENCY vs INVESTORS in their ability to evaluate an insurer, were the interest rates to rise by 200 basis points.
The market value of the insurer would go down.
Investors would quickly offer a lower price for the stock.
Rating agency does not evaluate the insurer as quickly as investors do, and it may wait to downgrade the insurer to see if interest rates reverse.
FELDBLUM
3 reasons why an insurer would request rating from more than one agency.
1) The insurer may want to issue debt and seeks a rating from an agency with MORE EXPERIENCE WITH DEBT RATING
2) It may want a rating from an AGENCY BETTER KNOWN TO INVESTORS
3) it may NOT BE SATISFIED with current rating and believes the 2nd rating will be better.
FELDBLUM
6 commonly requested information by rating agencies for the initial meeting
Financial statements for the past 5 years.
History of the company (major events, mergers acquisitions, expansions)
Biographies of executives
Investment strategy, policy, guidelines
Org Chart
Product description and business strategy for each line
FELDBLUM
3 reasons why almost all insurers are rated by agencies as compared to a small percentage in other industries.
1) agents are CAUTIOUS OF UNRATED INSURERS, since they might be in distress
- it is less expensive to pay for a rating than to demonstrate financial strength individually to others
2) 3rd PARTIES RELIANCE ON RATINGS
- independent agents use ratings to select insurers, insurers use ratings to select reinsurers
- Agents might be sued for providing insurance from a financially weak insurer
3) rating agencies EFFICIENCY at assessing financial strength
FELDBLUM
Contrast
Public rating vs interactive rating
PUBLIC RATING rely on public data only, with no input from the insurer
INTERACTIVE RATING rely on proprietary data and meetings with senior managers
FELDBLUM
What would happen if the insurer pays for an interactive rating one year but does not want an interactive rating the next year?
The agency may issue a PUBLIC RATING based on public data only
FELDBLUM
Why would an insurer refuse an interactive rating? What would happen if this happens?
because insurer expects a downgrade
Agency may proceed with a public rating to inform investors that the previous rating is no longer valid.
FELDBLUM
how insurer should disclose information to the rating agency
should not hide potentially damaging data, even though analyst does not request it
bettter to inform rating agencies of adverse events before they become evident. May keep a good rating doing so.
The contrary would lead to downgrade
FELDBLUM
what may happen to an exhibit presented to rating agency and not supported by data or if confidential
Exhibit may not be presented to rating committee
If insurer tell rating analysts that the analysis is confidential, the analyst will not demand more information
But will give the rating committee a conservative (wost case) estimate from industry figures