Business Law and Practice Flashcards
Unincorporated
- Requires few formalities
- No legal requirements
- Sole traders
- General partnerships
Incorporated
- Requires formal registration
- Private limited companies
- Limited liability partnerships
Sole trader
- Makes all decisions
- Owns all assets
Advantages
- Lack of formality
- Low administrative costs
Disadvantages
- Scale of business
- Unlimited liability
General partnership
- More than one party
- Parties contract to run business together
- Governed by Partnership Act 1890
- Not an entity in it’s own right
- Each partner has unlimited liability
- Can only grant a fixed charge to raise finance
Limited partnerships
- Governed by Limited Partnerships Act 1907
- Two types of partners and there must be one of each
1. General: - Manages business
- Unlimited liability
2. Limited - Invests capital
- Limited partner
- No role in managing/operating business
- Must be registered with companies house
- Can only grant a fixed charge
Limited liability partnership (LLP)
- Hybrid of limited company and general partnership
- Organisational flexibility
- Limited liability (up to amount invested)
- Must be registered with companies house
Both limited partnerships and LLPs must be registered with the Registrar of Companies at Companies House before beginning trading
Company
- Separate legal entity
- Limited liability for owners
Company limited by shares
- Shareholders generally liable only to say for shares
- Must register with companies house
- Two types: private and public
- Can raise finance by granting a floating charge over assets
- More administration
- Documents must be filed at Companies House and updated regularly
- Accounts must be filed (less private)
Companies not registered with companies house can keep details of financial affairs private
Fixed charged
A charge taken over a particular asset e.g. piece of land or machinery
Floating charge
A charge taken over a collection of assets e.g. stock
Easier method of raising finance compared with fixed charge
Company is liable for it’s only tax i.e. corporation tax compared to unincorporated companies where the sole traders or partners are taxed on personal income
Partnerships: Formation
- Persons: at least two humans or legal entities
- Carrying on a business in common i.e. buying or selling goods or providing services
- With a view to profit
This definition must be satisfied for a partnership to exist
An agreement to share profits is prima facie evidence of a partnership
Liability of partners
Each partner is personally liable for all of the debts of the partnership
Sharing profits - presumption of partnership
Does not apply to wages
Does not apply when agreement was only to repay a debt e.g. will share profits until debt is repaid
Sharing of losses
Agreement to share losses: some evidence of partnership but no presumption
Absence of agreement to share losses does not prevent formation of partnership
Merely owning property together and sharing gross returns does not create a partnership
Partnerships: Authority
Every partner is agent of partnership for purpose of partnerships’ business
Act of every partner carrying on in the usual way business of the kind carried on by partnership binds partners
Partnerships: authority
Partners are agents of partnership
Under agency law an agent is someone who can enter into legal relationships on behalf of another
Not every act of a partner can bind a partnership
Partnerships: authority
A partner can bind a partnership only if the partner acts with authority
Two types of authority:
1. Actual:
2. Apparent (ostensible):
Actual authority
Authority partner believes they have based on their communications and dealing with the firm,
Express actual authority: granted in partnership agreement or by a vote of the partners at a partnership meeting
Implied actual authority: course of dealing or related to express authority
Apparent (ostensible) authority
Partner’s act that seems related to business of the kind carried on by firm binds firm but some exceptions
Two objective tests:
1. Is partner’s act related to firm’s business
2. Is transaction one a partner in this type of firm would have authority to do?
Apparent (ostensible) authority: when a firm is not bound
- Partner had no actual authority to act AND;
- Third party knew partner lacked authority OR
- Third party did not know partner was a partner i.e. thought the partner was acting for themselves
Subjective test
Creditors rely on apparent authority
Apparent (ostensible) authority: when a firm is not bound
- Partner had no actual authority to act AND;
- Third party knew partner lacked authority OR
- Third party did not know partner was a partner i.e. thought the partner was acting for themselves
Subjective test