Business Associations Flashcards

You may prefer our related Brainscape-certified flashcards:
1
Q

Übersicht Business Associations

A

I. Agency
II. Partnerships
III. Corporations

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
2
Q

I. Agency

Agency Übersicht

A
  1. Agency Grundsätze
  2. Agency Authority
  3. Agency Contract Liability
  4. Agency Tort Liability
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
3
Q

I. Agency

  1. Agency Grundsätze
A

I. Grds: The principal (P) is responsible for the acts of his agent (A) (“respondeat superior” doctrine)

II. Voraussetzungen:
a) Formation by act of parties: An agency relationship results from assent by one entity (principal, P) to another (agent, A) that the agent shall represent and act on the principal’s behalf in dealing with third parties and subject to the principal’s control, and assent by the agent so to act

b) Formation by estoppel (quasi eine Art Duldungs-/Anscheinsvollmacht): third-party reliance on P’s
communication

III. Rechtsfolge
a) Duties owed by agent:
1. fiduciary duty of loyalty
2. duty of obedience to reasonable directions
3. duty of care under the circumstances (e.g., disclose all relevant information)
4. express contractual duties

b) Duties owed by principal:
1. duty to reasonably compensate or reimburse expenses
2. duty to cooperate (not unreasonably interfere with A’s performance)
3. express contractual duties

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
4
Q
A
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
4
Q

I. Agency

SonderP: Kann ein Minderjähriger einen Vertreter bennenen?

A

P must have contractual capacity (e.g., an appointment of an agent by a minor is voidable), but no consideration is required

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
5
Q

I. Agency

  1. Agency Authority
A

Grds: To determine if P is bound by the contract, A must have had authority to enter into the contract and bind P

Arten von Authority:
1. Actual express authority: Authority through express manifestations to A contained within four corners of agreement

2. Actual implied authority: Authority that A reasonably believes that A has as a result of P’s actions, e.g., incidental to express authority, customary, prior acquiescence by P, emergency measures, buy or sell goods, manage investments

Termination of actual authority: Termination occurs by lapse of a specified or reasonable time, occurrence of a specified event, change in circumstances, breach of duty by A, unilateral termination by either A or P (subject to breach of K), operation of law (death or incapacity unless irrevocable, or by filing a statement of authority with secretary of state to terminate P’s authority)

3. Apparent authority (P-3P): Arises from manifestations of A’s authority due to P holding out as such via P’s words, actions, or failure to act, thereby inducing 3P to reasonably but mistakenly rely on that authority
a) Duldung: Impostors: If P negligently lets impostor appear to have agency, P is liable for impostor’s actions
b) Anschein: Lingering apparent authority: If A’s actual authority has terminated (unless by death or incapacity), he has apparent authority to act on P’s behalf as to 3P with whom P knows he dealt with, unless 3P received notice of the termination

4. Ratification: If an “agent” acts for P without any authority but P subsequently validates the act (expressly or impliedly), P is bound if: P must (1) know or have reason to know all material facts, (2) accept the transaction, and (3) have capacity

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
6
Q

I. Agency

  1. Agency contract liability
A

A. 3P v. P: Any type of P is liable to 3P on the K entered into by A as long as A had valid authority to act

B. 3P v. A: A’s liability depends on P’s identity and existence known to 3P
a) Disclosed P: A is generally not liable (and P is liable on the K), unless K intended A to be liable
b) Unidentified (partially disclosed) P: A and/or P may be liable at 3P’s election. A may avoid liability by disclosing P’s identity
c) Undisclosed P: A and/or P may be liable at 3P’s election

C. 3P liability: Disclosed P may enforce K but not A. Unidentified/undisclosed P and A may enforce K (P still benefits)

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
7
Q

I. Agency

  1. Agency tort liability
A

Grds. P is generally liable for torts committed by A who is an employee, but not an independent contractor. If A is not liable, P is not liable (aber: P may be still be liable for negligent hiring, supervision, or entrustment of employee)

Reichweite: liable for employee’s torts if they were committed ** within the scope of employee’s employment**
- Factors: same general nature as job, proximity to time and place of authorized employment, motivation to serve employer
- Intentional torts are not considered within the scope of employment, unless authorized by P, a natural part of duties, or a misrepresentation

Ausn. P may be still be liable for an independent contractor (IC) if
a) the activity involved was inherently dangerous,
b) duty was nondelegable, or
c) P was negligent in hiring IC

Relationship by estoppel: If P creates the appearance of employer employee relationship that 3P relies on, P is estopped from denying the relationship and will be liable

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
8
Q

Exkurs: Abgrenzung Employee/IC

A

a) P’s control over manner and method of A’s performance
b) characterization by parties
c) customs of locality regarding supervision of work
d) degree of skill required on the job
e) whose tools or facilities are used,
f) length of employment (short more likely to be IC, indefinite more likely to be employee)
g) basis of compensation (project basis vs. time basis)
h) understanding of parties, whether hired to further P’s business (nonbusiness purpose, e.g., mowing lawn, more likely IC)

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
9
Q

II. Partnerships

Übersicht

A
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
10
Q

II. Partnerships

I. Rechtsquellen
II. Definition
III. Voraussetzung/Bildung
IV. Haftung
V. Gesellschafterwechsel
VI. Eigentum

A

I. Rechtsquellen: default rules of Revised Uniform Partnership Act, may be modified by agreement

II. Definition: general partnership (GP) is an association of 2+ entities to carry on a business for profit as co-owners

III. Voraussetzung/Bildung: key test is parties’ intent. No formal agreement is required, intent may be implied through conduct (e.g. profit sharing, joint title to property, partie’s designation as “partnership”)

IV. Haftung: unlimited personal liability no matter what limited liability they declare

V. Gesellschafterwechsel: Bringing in new partners requires unanimous approval

VI. Eigentum. Property acquired by GP is owned by GP and not the individual partners—not freely transferrable, no right to use partnership property other than for the benefit of GP

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
11
Q

II. Partnerships

Rechte von general partner

A
  1. Management: All partners have an equal right to participate in the management and control of the partnership, unless there is an agreement providing otherwise
    a) Decisions involving “ordinary course of business” are controlled by majority of partners
    b) Matters outside “ordinary course of business” require (unanimous) consent of all partners
  2. Profits: Each GP is entitled to share equally in profits and must contribute toward losses in proportion to profit share. May agree to share profits other than equally and share the losses in the same ratio
  3. Interest: Economic right to interest in GP is personal and transferable w/o dissolving GP (transferee is only entitled to receive distributions; transferor retains other rights and duties)
  4. Indemnification for payments and obligations reasonably incurred in carrying on the partnership business
    a) Contribution from other partner for paying more than his share of partnership liability
    b) No right to remuneration for services to GP except reasonable comp for winding up business
  5. Inspection: A partner may inspect and copy the partnership books
  6. Lawsuit: A partner may sue another partner (e.g., for breach of agreement or duty, or to enforce a right)
  7. Settlement of account upon dissolution
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
12
Q

Duties von general partner

A
  1. Duty of care not to engage in negligent, reckless, or unlawful conduct or intentional misconduct
  2. Duty of loyalty to act in best interests of the partnership, including duties to (1) account for all profits and benefits derived from GP (2) not deal with GP as one with adverse interest, and (3) not compete with GP, (4) Must present business opportunities to GP if it is connected to the business
  3. Duty of good faith and fair dealing
  4. Duty to keep books complete and accurate and present to interested partners
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
13
Q

II. Partnerships

Partnership Authority

A

Grds. Each partner is an agent of the partnership for the purpose of its business. Apply agency concepts

  1. A partner is bound by another partner’s act if the other partner had actual authority, which could come from express agreement or the other partner’s** reasonable belief** he had authority based on communication with other partners
  2. Apparent authority: A partner who acts in the ordinary course of the partnership’s business binds the general partnership, unless at the time of K, (1) the general partner did not have authority to act in that particular matter, and (2) the person with whom he is dealing actually knew or had notification that he lacked authority
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
14
Q

II. Partnership

General partnership liability

A

A. Partners are liable for all K entered into by a partner in the scope of partnership or w/ authority of partnership

B. Partners are liable for all torts by any partner or employee w/in the ordinary business or w/ authority of partnership

C. Civil liability is joint and several (1+ partner may be sued)
a) Suit against partner: Each partner is personally and individually liable for entire amount of partnership obligations. If paid more than fair share, can seek contribution/indemnification (if whole obligation paid)
b) New partner not personally liable for obligations arising before he became a partner
c) Outgoing partner liable for obligations arising while he was a partner, unless payment, release, or novation

D. Criminal liability: Partners are criminally liable only for their own crime or participation

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
15
Q

II. Partnership

Dissociation & Dissolution

A

Grds. A partner has the power to dissociate or dissolve at any time by express will, agreed event, event that makes continuation unlawful, expulsion (unanimous vote), bankruptcy, death or incapacity, or judicial order

Folgen:
a) Only duties of loyalty and care regarding matters arising before the dissociation (confidentiality) continues
b) Dissolution requires the partnership business to be wound up (sell and settle GP affairs) before termination (final)
c) Partners may waive dissolution by unanimous vote of partners who have not wrongfully dissolved
d) Distribution of assets: creditors > partner creditors > non-creditor partners’ accounts (buy ins) > settlement
e) Settlement: Partners must make distribution/contribution of +/– balance in proportion to profit/loss sharing

16
Q

II. Partnership

Limited partnership (LP v LLP)

A

LP:
Includes 1+ GP and 1+ LP
GPs are personally liable for partnership obligations
LPs have no personal liability beyond contributions

LLP:
Partners not personally liable for LLP’s obligations, personally liable for own wrongful acts but not co-partner acts.

Beide:
LP and LLP require filing to form

17
Q

III. Corporation

Übersicht

A
18
Q

III. Corporation

Arten von Corporations

A

1. De jure corporation: Incorporators must file articles of incorporation (AOI) with secretary of state. Lawful corporate purpose and perpetual duration are presumed

Probleme beim filing: Substantial compliance with statute also qualifies, e.g., articles were filed but improperly

2. De facto corporation: Good faith, colorable attempt made to comply with incorporation statute + conduct of business as if validly incorporated (unaware of invalid incorporation) (defense except v. state seeking dissolution)

3. Corporation by estoppel: Parties who act as if there were a corporation are estopped from denying the corporation’s existence and cannot avoid liability in K (N/A to tort victims). Piercing of corporate veil is not available to reach s/h

4. Limited liability corporation (LLC): Members have limited liability, not personally liable for LLC’s obligations

5. Professional corporation: Licensed professionals may incorporate as a PC. Pers. liable for own malpractice only

6. [CA] Statutory close corporation: A corp can elect to become a statutory close corporation if it has 35 or fewer s/h, and files articles saying it’s a “close corporation.” May be managed by its s/h and forgo regular corporate formalities

19
Q

III. Corporation

Ultra vires act (UVA)

A

CL: If articles include a narrow business purpose, activities beyond scope of stated business purpose may be void and unenforceable.

Revised Model Business Corporation Act (RMBCA): UVAs generally enforceable, may be raised in suit by s/h (enjoin proposed UVA), corp (damages for approving), state (dissolve for committing)

20
Q

III. Corporation

Piercing the corporate veil

A

Piercing the corporate veil refers to a special instance where the court holds the shareholder or director of a corporation personally liable (jointly and severally) for the corporation’s debts if

Fallgruppe 1: Unity of interest: Corp is “alter ego” of person; separate personalities of corp and individual no longer exist. Shown where s/h treats corp assets as own (commingling), failure to observe corp formalities, or inadequate capital at time of formation to reas. cover foreseeable liabilities (undercapitalization)

Fallgruppe 2: Injustice or fraud: Necessary to prevent fraud, avoidance of existing personal obligations

21
Q

III. Corporation

Can a corporation merge with other entities?

A

Yes, A corporation may merge with another form of business entity, such as LP

22
Q

III. Corporation

Vorgründungsgesellschaft

A

Pre-incorporation contracts / Promoter liability: A promoter acts on behalf of a corporation not yet formed. Promoters are jointly and severally liable for obligations under pre-incorporation K, even after corporation is formed

  • Promoters remain liable as fiduciaries of corporation, until novation (agreement to substitute new party)
  • Adoption of K: Corporation may become bound by promoter’s pre-incorporation K by express or implied adoption of promoter’s K (by knowing and accepting benefits)
23
Q

III. Corporation

Liability of the corporation

A

Officers (president, secretary, treasurer) are agents of corp. Apply agency concepts

24
Q

III. Corporation

Corporate stock for consideration?

A

Adequate:
- Any valid consideration may be received for par value stock (der Wert, der in der corporation charat festgelegt ist, entspricht nicht dem market value, mit dem die Anteile tatsächlich gehandelt werden) if board of directors believes in good faith it’s worth at least that
- Treasury stock (zurückbehaltener Stock, z.B. durch Aktienrückkäufe) (no par stock – any valid consideration) is previously issued, reacquired by corp, and resold
- Preemptive right (if articles of incorporation grants): Right of s/h to same % ownership by buying stock upon new issuance

Inadequate:
both corp/agent or receiver of stock may be liable if consideration is inadequate

25
Q

III. Corporation

Board of Directors

A

A. Election & removal: s/h elect D, s/h may remove D w/ or w/o cause, s/h or D may fill vacancy

B. Effective action by BOD grds. requirements:
1. Meeting is required unless all D consent in writing to act without a meeting
2. Quorum (> 50% of all D) must be present for the board to be legally competent to transact business
3. Majority vote (> 50%) of quorum in attendance is required to constitute a valid action by the board

C. Duty of care: Under the “business judgment rule” D&Officers must perform their duties in good faith, with such care as an ordinarily prudent person in a like position would use under similar circumstances, in a manner reasonably believed to be in the best interests of the corporation. It concerns directors’ decision-making process, not the substance of their decisions.

D. Duty of loyalty: D&O have a duty to be loyal to the corporation, including to act in its best interest
I. Self-dealing: Conflict of interest arises where D gets unfair benefit from transaction with own corporation
1. Conflicting if: D knows that he or related person is party to the tx; has beneficial financial interest in (or is close to the tx that the interest would reasonably be expected to influence D’s judgment during vote); or is a D, partner, agent, or employee of another entity the corp is transacting with
2. UNLESS one of these happens:
a) (1) Disclosure of material facts to BOD and (2) majority of disinterested Ds (2+) approves transaction and (3) [CA] reasonable to corp
b) (1) Disclosure of material facts to s/h and (2) majority of disinterested s/h approves transaction.
c) Transaction was fair and reasonable to corp based on circumstances
3. Remedies: Enjoin transaction, rescission (set aside transaction), damages

II. Corporate opportunity: D must not benefit from any business opportunity that could benefit the corporation.
1. If corp would be interested, D must first present opp to corp, disclosing all material facts.
2. Usurpation if (1) opp is within corp’s line of business (i.e., has fundamental knowledge, practical experience), (2) corp has interest or expectancy in opp, (3) corp is financially able to take opp (not a defense alone)
3. Remedies: recover profits, constructive trust (corp gets the usurped opportunity instead)

III. Competition: D must not engage in a competing business with own corporation. Remedy: damages

IV. Ratification: D may defend a claim by obtaining ratification by
a) majority vote of independent D
b) majority vote of committee of 2+ independent D, or
c) majority vote of shares held by independent s/h

26
Q

III. Corporation

Shareholder Rights

A

1. Direct suits: Action brought for breach of fiduciary duty owed to s/h by D&O for damages to s/h

2. Derivative suits: Brought by s/h on behalf of corp to enforce a corporate right that D&O fail to assert
a) Must be brought by a contemporaneous stock owner (1+ share when claim arose and throughout litigation)
b) Demand requirement: S/h must first make written demand on corp to redress grievances, and 90 days must have passed, unless (1) corp rejects demand or (2) irreparable injury to corp would result by waiting 90 days
c) Futility EXCEPTION: Demand is excused because of futility if (1) a majority of BOD is interested in the challenged tx, (2) BOD did not fully inform themselves about the tx to the extent reasonably appropriate under the circumstances, or (3) tx was not a product of a valid business judgment

**3. Right to vote: **in person or by proxy executed in writing
- Proxies are valid for 11 months by default. Irrevocable only if proxy states so + coupled with interest
- Effective s/h action (default) → quorum of outstanding shares must be present; majority must approve

4. Right to inspect: Accounting records, s/h lists, etc. with proper purpose. Bylaws and minutes regardless of purpose

5. Shareholder agreements (control voting)
a) Voting agreement: Written agreement to vote shares as required in agreement is binding and enforceable
b) Voting trusts: Formal written agreement delegating voting power to a trustee expires in 10 years, renewable
c) Agreement to eliminate corporate formalities (closely held corp) – no PCV even if formalities not observed

6. No inherent right to dividends

7. Controlling shareholder must refrain from obtaining a special advantage or causing corp to prejudice minority s/h
- Controlling s/h is treated as an “insider” under Securities Exchange Act

8. S/h not liable for corporate obligations, except where PCV or controlling s/h owe fiduciary duty to minority s/h

27
Q

III. Corporation

Fundamental corporate changes

A

A. General procedure: BOD adopts resolution, written notice to s/h, majority s/h approves, file changes in AOI w/ state

B. Amendment to AOI: Any provision lawful in original. Minor amendments (delete initial D) do not need s/h approval

C. Merger: D and majority s/h of both corps must approve. Parent corp owning 90% of subsidiary corp do not need approval of D or s/h of sub (short-form merger of subsidiary)

D. Disposition: Sale/lease/exchange of all or substantially all corporate assets must follow fundamental chg procedure

E. Dissolution: A dissolved corp may not do any business except to wind up or liquidate assets
a) Voluntary dissolution: If shares not issued or business not yet commenced, majority of initial Ds may dissolve corp. If shares issued, any remaining assets after winding up must be distributed to s/h
b) Involuntary dissolution may be initiated by attorney general (e.g., if corp abused powers), business abandoned for 1 year, or business can no longer be conducted with advantage to its s/h (internal dissention)

28
Q

IV. Federal securities law

Allgemeines

A

A. Security: investment where there is an expectation of profits primarily from the efforts of others

B. Jurisdiction: Did it involve interstate commerce (ISC, crosses state lines)? Otherwise, state law governs

29
Q

IV. Federal Securities Law

10b-5 rule

A

A. Regel: Rule 10b-5 prohibits anyone from using interstate commerce to defraud or make an untrue statement of (or omit) a material fact in connection with purchase or sale of any security

B. Voraussetzungen:
I. A private Π must show, in addition to interstate commerce (phone, mail, etc.), to create liability:
1. Fraudulent conduct: Misstatement, misrepresentation, or omission that breaches fiduciary duty
a) Materiality: Reas. investor would consider it important in making an investment decision
b) Scienter: Intent to deceive, manipulate, or defraud. At least recklessness as to truth
2. Causation: Π actually bought or sold the security from any source (no privity required), Excludes potential buyers who do not buy and those who own shares and do not sell
3. Reliance: Π relied on Δ’s statement. Often assumed for material omissions
4. Damages
II. Common law fraud (w/ punitive) may apply to overt misrepresentation made regarding market information

30
Q

IV. Federal securities law

Insider Trading

A

A. Def: Insider is anyone who learns of material nonpublic information (MNI) as a consequence of his corporate position or has a fiduciary relationship to the corp, e.g., directors, officers, controlling s/h, senior employees, attorneys, accountants, has an obligation not to make a secret dealing by trading stock before public disclosure

B. Verhältnis zur 10b-5 Regel: in der Lit. umstritten inwieweit sich 10b-5 wirklich auf Insider-Trading bezient

C. Wohl hM: An insider breaches 10b-5 by trading on insider information and breaching a duty of trust and confidence owed to issuer, s/h of issuer, or (for misappropriation) source of material nonpublic information (MNI)

D. Tipper liability: If an insider intentionally discloses MNI in a breach of his fiduciary duty and receives a personal benefit (broad: gift, money, reputational gain, etc.), he may be liable under 10b-5
-Tippee may be liable only if tipper breached duty + tippee traded on MNI knowing tipper was breaching
- Misappropriation: The gov’t can prosecute under 10b-5 for trading on market information in breach of a duty of trust and confidence owed to the source (not necessarily corp directly)

31
Q

IV. Federal Securities Law

16b

A

Section 16(b) requires surrender of short-term profits by any director, officer, or s/h of a public corp owning 10%+ of a class of security, if he sells a security w/in 6 months of a purchase (or vice versa) while a 10%+ owner both at the time of purchase and sale. As it imposes strict liability, there are no defenses (e.g., good faith)

32
Q

IV. Federal Securities Law

Sarbanes-Oxley Act 2002

A

SOX regulates behavior of D&O. It requires that CEO and CFOs certify that based on their knowledge, the reports filed with the SEC do not contain any material misrepresentations or omissions, and they fairly represent the financial position of the company. Only public accounting firms may issue audit reports, Must have indep audit committee from BOD, may recover profits during false statements or stock blackout

33
Q
A