burglary Flashcards

You may prefer our related Brainscape-certified flashcards:
1
Q

When is a person guilty of burgalry?

A

A person is guilty of burglary if:
1. under s9(1)(a) He enters any building or part of building as a tresspasser with the intention to commit .9 (2) (stealing, inflicting grievous bodily harm or criminal damag

  1. Under s9(1)b) ving entered any building or part of a building as a trespasser, he steals or attempts to steal anything in the building or that part of it or inflicts or attempts to inflict on any person therein any grievous bodily harm.
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
2
Q

Explain under 9(1)a) when a person is guilty of burglary.

A

following 9(1)(a) a person is guilty if he enters any building or part of a building as a trespasser and with intent to commit any such offence as mentioned in s.9 (2) (stealing, inflicting grievous bodily harm or criminal damage

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
3
Q

Explain when a person is guilty of burglary under s9(1)B) of the theft act

A

having entered any building or part of a building as a trespasser, he steals or attempts to steal anything in the building or that part of it or inflicts or attempts to inflict on any person therein any grievous bodily harm.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
4
Q

What is the act that governs burglary ?

A

The Theft Act 1968

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
5
Q

What is the sentence for burglary?

A
  • Max sentence for burglary dwelling is 14 years imprisonment
  • Max sentence for burglary non
    dwelling carries a max sentence for 10 years
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
6
Q

What is the Actus reus of burglary ?

A

The actus reus is

  • Entered
  • Building or part of a building
  • As a trespasser
  • as defined in the case of R V Collins he entered the building as a tresspasser
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
7
Q

What cases have defined entry?

A
  • R v Collins- entered the building
  • R v Brown - defendant’s entry needs to only be effective not ‘substantial and effective’
  • R v Ryan- entered the building as aa trespasser
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
8
Q

What is the mens rea for Burglary ?

A

-

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
9
Q

Explain the meaning of a building as apart of the actus reus for burglary

A

Governed under the Theft Act 1968 s9(4)

  • A building is an ‘inhabited dwelling’; this means houses or flats and it includes outbuildings and sheds. It also includes ‘inhabited vehicles and vessels’ for example caravans or houseboats
  • Definition comes from the case of Stevens v Gourley “a structure of considerable size and intended to be permanent or at least to endure for a considerable time”
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
10
Q

What governs buildings as the actus reus of burglary ?

A

Theft Act 1968

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
11
Q

What case originally defined what a building is?

A
  • Stevens v Gourley - as a structure of considerable size and intended to be permanent or at least endure for a considerable time
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
12
Q

What did the cases of B & S V Leathely and Northfolk Constabulary v Seeking and Gould consider?

A
  • B and S v Leathley (1979) and Norfolk Constabulary v Seeking and Gould (1986) both considered whether large storage containers were ‘structures’ which could be classed as buildings
  • B and S v Leathley- held that the container was considered to be a building
  • Norfolk Constabulary v Seeking and Gould were not guilty of burglary as the containers had wheels and were therefore, uninhabited vehicles.
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
13
Q

Explain what is meant by part of a building.

A

Part of a building intends to cover situations where an individual has permission for one part of the building but goes to the other

  • Its possible that a person becomes a trespasser when they move from one part of the building to another
  • R V Walkington - entered part of the building without permission as a trespasser with intent to steal
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
14
Q

What was the case that can be used to show part of a building ?

A

R V Walkington- entered part of the building without permission

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
15
Q

Explain what constitutes a trespasser.

A
  • If the D has permission to enter he is not a trespasser example R V Collins
  • If D goes beyond permission then he is a trespasser
  • R v Jones and Smith- trespasser if he enters premises of another knowing that he is entering in excess of the permission that has been given to him to enter, or being reckless whether he is in excess of that permission.’
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
16
Q

What is the significance of the case R V Jones and Smith

A
  • This case shows when a Defendant can become a trespasser
  • It held trespasser if he enters premises of another knowing that he is entering in excess of the permission that has been given to him to enter, or being reckless whether he is in excess of that permission.’
17
Q

Explain the mens rea for Burglary

A
  • D must have the mens rea required to be a trespasser and the specific mens rea for s.9(1)a and or s9(1)B
  • D must either intend or be reckless as to whether they are a trespasser
  • s9(1)a) d must intend to commit one of the three offences ie steal , cause gbh or do unlawful criminal damages
  • s9(1)b) D must entered the building as a trespasser and steals or attempts to inflict gbh
18
Q

What is conditional intent ?

A
  • This is where the defendant would be entering the premises as a trespasser with the intent to steal anything of value,
  • they can be found guilty under s9(1)(a) even if they do not find anything of value or they do not steal anything.
  • 9(1)(b) the defendant must also have the mens rea for theft of GBH when committing or attempting to commit the actus reus of one of these offences.
  • Attorney General Reference (No 1 and 2 of 1979) - D will still be guilty of burglary if they enter a building or part of a building with the intent to steal only if there is something worth stealing.
19
Q

What case can be used for conditional intent ?

A
  • Attorney Generals Reference n1 & 2 of 1979- efendant will still be guilty of burglary if they enter a building or part of a building with the intent to steal only if there is something worth stealing.