Burger (2009) Flashcards

You may prefer our related Brainscape-certified flashcards:
1
Q

What was the aim of Burger’s study?

A

To investigate obedience by partially replicating Milgram’s baseline experiment to examine whether situational factors affect obedience in comparison to an authority figure.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
2
Q

What were the 6 welfare actions that Burger included to make his study more ethical?

A
  1. 2-step screening process to exclude anyone who may have a negative reaction to the study
  2. Ppts were told 3 times (twice in writing) that they can withdraw at any point and still get the $50 for participation.
  3. The ppts were given a lower shock of 15v
  4. The study was stopped at 150v instead of 450v to avoid intense stress
  5. There was no time between ending the study and revealing the learner had received no shocks
  6. The experimenter was a clinical psychologist who was told to end immediately if he saw any signs of excessive stress
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
3
Q

What did Burger predict about the obedience levels in comparison to Milgram’s baseline study?

A

He didn’t think there would be any real difference

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
4
Q

What was the gender difference in obedience?

A

There was no gender difference, it was exactly the same

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
5
Q

What was interesting about motivational control personalities?

A

Individuals who were more motivated to have control and make their own decisions were less likely to obey the experimenter than those who were less motivated to feel in control.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
6
Q

What was interesting about the sample Burger used?

A
  • The sample was self-selecting
  • It was a mix of men and women
  • The age range was 20-81
  • The sample went through a 2-step screening process
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
7
Q

Where was the advertisement placed?

A

In newspapers and on flyers in libraries, farmers’ markets, coffee shops and community centres.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
8
Q

How much were participants paid?

A

$50 for two 45 minute sessions

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
9
Q

What happened in the first screening process?

A

Any participant with more than 2 psychology classes or answered yes to at least one of the six questions they were asked about psychiatric history were eliminated (about 30% of the sample).

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
10
Q

What was the main process of the second screening process?

A

It was at Santa Clara University and the remaining ppts had to fill out a set of questionnaires.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
11
Q

What were the questionnaires measuring?

A

THE INTERPERSONAL REACTIVITY INDEX: Measured levels of empathy
THE BECK ANXIETY INVENTORY: Measures severity of anxiety
THE DESIRABILITY OF CONTROL SCALE: Measures extent of motivations to see themselves as in control of their lives
THE BECK DEPRESSION INDEX: Measures severity of depression

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
12
Q

What happened to the ppts after the 4 questionnaires?

A

They were interviewed by psychiatrists to check if they would be negatively impacted by the study. Each interview was around 30 minutes.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
13
Q

How many ppts were eliminated after the second screening process?

A

47/123 ppts were removed. 76 were invited back a week later, 6 dropped out (5 had expressed awareness of Milgram’s study). This left 41 women and 29 men aged 20-81.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
14
Q

What was the baseline procedure in Burger’s study?

A
  • ppts were split into 2 groups of equal gender ratio
  • Each ppt was introduced to the experimenter and the confederate
  • Before the study began, they were both given their $50 and verbally given the right to withdraw and still keep the money.
  • Ppts then signed a contract which stated their rights to withdraw and that they may be videotaped by two hidden cameras.
  • The same procedure was then followed as Milgram’s
  • Confederate strapped to chair and explains his heart condition.
  • ppt was given a 15v shock instead of 45v
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
15
Q

What were the ‘profiles’ of the experimenter and confederate?

A

Experimenter - White caucasian male in his 30s
Confederate - White caucasian male in his 50s

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
16
Q

What happened on the recording at 150v?

A

It stated that the confederate said “ugh, get me out of here, I told you I had a heart condition, get me out please, I refuse to go on”
From this point on, the ppt was given verbal prods and prompts, if they were resistant the experiment ended but if not it continued.

17
Q

What happened immediately after the study ended?

A

The ppt was debriefed and told that the shocks were fake, being taken into the room to see the perfectly fine confederate.

18
Q

Explain the modelled refusal condition

A

This was the same procedure but there were 2 confederates instead of 1. One was the learner as per usual and one played the teacher alongside the ppt. The teacher confederate then begins the experiment but at 90v hesitates and refuses to continue, after verbal prods and prompts, the real ppt has to take over.

19
Q

What were the results of the modelled refusal condition?

A

BASELINE:
Stopped at 150v or sooner: 12 (30%)
Continued after 150v: 28 (70%)
MODELLED REFUSAL:
Stopped at 150v or sooner: 11 (36%)
Continued after 150v: 19 (64%)

There wasn’t a lot of difference but a slightly high percentage dropped out at 150v after having someone else drop out first.

20
Q

What were the results based on gender?

A

Burger found barely any difference in obedience levels between men and women, he stated that women were only slightly more likely to continue than men.

21
Q

Were there any differences found in obedience levels due to personality, age, ethnicity or education.

A

No

22
Q

What was Burger’s conclusion?

A

The results found overall were similar to Milgram’s. Burger cannot assume that the ppts that went to 150v would have gone all the way to 450v so his results aren’t 100% valid. There was barely any differences in obedience levels, empathy scores and control level scores.

23
Q

Outline 2 positives of Burger’s study

A
  1. Ethics - Burger addressed the ethical issues caused by Milgram’s experiment. He put other measures into place to assure the ethics of his study.
  2. Generalisability - the sample was more diverse in terms of age and ethnicity.
24
Q

Outline 2 negatives of Burger’s study

A
  1. Internal validity - Burger stopped the study at 150v and assumed that the participants that continued to there would continue to 450v with therefore creates a question of validity in his results.
  2. Ecological validity (mundane realism) - The experiment had low levels of this as this was a lab with electric shocks. Not a realistic way in which people would obey authority figures. It was a very artificial environment.
25
Q

What 2 variables seem to affect obedience?

A

Empathy and desire for control

26
Q

How many word pairs were confederates asked to remember?

A

25

27
Q

What 5 participant characteristics were examined in this study?

A

Gender
Age
Education
Empathy
Control

28
Q

True or false: Ppts with a high desire for control tended to show reluctance earlier in the base condition?

A

True