British Withdrawal From India Flashcards
What led to the Government of India Act 1919?
What led to the Government of India act 1919 was nationalist demands for self government after the First World War.
What did the Government of India Act 1919 allow?
The Government of India Act 1919 allowed a limited system of self-government for India, based on the sharing of powers between Indian ministers and the British Viceroy. Policy of dyarchy: Viceroy maintained control of main areas such as foreign Policy Legislative Council - split into 2 parts with some elected members Provincial councils run by elected Indian ministers.
What was the intent behind the Government of India Act 1919?
The Government of India Act 1919 intended to satisfy the demands for greater Indian representation among the moderate nationalists, by presenting the reforms as a step towards full Dominion status for India.
Why did Britain adopt a ‘twin track’ strategy?
Britain adopted a ‘twin track’ strategy out of concerns that their reforms might strengthen nationalist aspirations for faster change.
What was the ‘twin track’ strategy?
The ‘twin track’ strategy was a combination of reforms and a determination to make them work, with a clear signal that any resort by the nationalists to create mass resistance would be dealt with ruthlessly. This second, tougher strand was enshrined in the passage of the Rowlatt Act of 1919.
What was the Rowlatt Act 1919?
The Rowlatt Act gave the authorities harsh powers to arrest and imprison anyone who protested against British rule. It proved to be very counterproductive and produced the Amritsar Massacre of 1919.
What expectations were there after the First World War?
By 1918, expectations were high that measures introduced during the war would be eased and that India would be given more political autonomy.
The Montagu-Chelmsford Report, presented to the British Parliament in 1918, did in fact recommend limited local self-government; a system of ‘dyarchy’ was established. Instead, government of India passed the Rowlatt Act in early 1919 which essentially extended the repressive war time measures.
What was the Amritsar massacre April 13 1919?
The Amritsar massacre was when a crowd of at least 10,00 men, women and children gathered in an open space known as the Jallianwalla Bagh was open fired on by Brigadier General Dyer who was given the task of restoring order as public gatherings were banned. They kept shooting until they ran out of ammo and an estimated 379 (according to the British government) people were killed, 1200 more were wound.
What was the impact of the Amritsar massacre?
The Amritsar Massacre was humiliating and extremely damaging to Britain’s reputation. It was worse than the Indian Mutiny and the Sudan because they fired on innocent people and they had no weapons; they were praying. It was publicly condemned by Montagu (“Are you going to keep your hold on India by terrorism, racial humiliation, subordination and frightfulness…”) and Churchill (“… a monstrous event, an event which stands in singular and sinister isolation… the crowd was neither armed or attacking”).
Indian Congress officials claimed that it showed Britain no longer had the moral authority to govern. It created nationalist movements. At least 379 died. Led to a crisis of confidence in the Empire. Further outbreaks of violence e.g. Chauri Chaura Incident where participants of the non-cooperation movement were fired upon by police. Galvanised support Gandhi’s noncooperation movement of 1920-22.
Who was Gandhi?
Gandhi went to England to train as a lawyer. After failing to set up his own law firm in India, he began his career in South Africa where he began to publicly criticised colonialism. He went back to India in 1915 where he was later elected as the President of the Indian National Congress as a member of the Congress Party.
What did Gandhi do in 1917-1918?
In 1917-1918 he championed the downtrodden indigo workers of the state of Bihar, and mediated in a textile industry dispute in Ahmedabad as well as a dispute over land taxes in Gujarat.
What was the non-cooperation movement in 1920?
The non-cooperation movement of 1920 was to be non-violent and to consist of Indians resigning their titles; boycotting government educational institutions, the courts, government service, foreign goods, and elections; and eventually, refusing to pay taxes. The non-cooperation movement drew in middle-class Indians into the campaign for Indian independence.
What happened to the non-cooperation movement and what did it mark?
In 1921 the government, confronted with a united Indian front for the first time, was visibly shaken, but a revolt by the Muslim Moplahs of Kerala (southwestern India) in August 1921 and a number of violent outbreaks alarmed moderate opinion. After an angry mob murdered by police officers in the village of Chauri Chaura in Feb 1921, Gandhi himself called off the movement; the next month he was arrested without incident. The movement marked the transition of Indian nationalism from a middle class to a mass basis.
What was the Simon Commission, 1929-30?
The Simon Commision (which did not include Indian representation), under Sir John Simon, reviewed the India Act and recommended that:
- a federal system of government be created across India, incorporating both provinces under direct British rule and the Princely States.
- the provinces be given more power.
- defence, internal security and foreign affairs should remain in the hands of a British viceroy, ensuring overall British control.
Did not include Indian representatives.
What was the Civil Disobedient Movement 1930-31?
On March 12 1930, Gandhi began a defiant march to the sea in protest of the British monopoly on salt.
Why did Gandhi march protest the British monopoly on salt?
Britain’s Salt Acts prohibited Indians from collecting or selling salt, a staple in the Indian diet. Citizens were forced to buy vital mineral from the British, who, in addition to exercising a monopoly over the manufacture and sale of salt, also exerted a heavy salt tax. Indian’s poor suffered the most. Defying the Salt Acts, Gandhi declared resistance to British salt policies to be the unifying theme for his new campaign of satyagraha, or mass civil disobedience.
What did the Salt Marches consist of?
On March 12 1930, Gandhi organised a 24 day March to Dandi with 78 followers where they were to defy British policy be making salt from seawater. Gandhi reached down and picked up a small lump of natural salt out of the mud and British law had been defied. Civil disobedience broke out all across India, soon involving millions of Indians, and British authorities arrested more than 60,000 people. Gandhi himself was arrested, but the satyagraha continued without him.
What occurred at both the Round Table Conferences in 1930 and 1931?
Gandhi was unable to attend the first as he had been imprisoned, but he represented the Congress Party at the second. Britain rejected Dominion status for India because of doubts about the competence of non-white leaders and peoples as well as concern for India’s strategic and economic importance to Britain.
Why was Gandhi even more unsuccessful at The Second Round Table Conference?
Gandhi could not reach agreement with the Muslims on Muslim representation and safeguards. Gandhi’s claim of the Congress representing majority was not endorsed by the British and also the Muslim representative. The final blow to Gandhi came when at the end of the conference Ramsay MacDonald undertook to produce a Communal Award for minority representation, with the provision that any free agreement between the parties could be substituted for his award.
What was the second civil disobedient movement in 1932-34?
The Congress Working Committee took the decision to restart The Civil Disobedience Movement, as the British government was not prepared to relent. Gandhi resumed the movement in January 1932 and appealed to the entire nation to join in. The viceroy was also informed of the stance assumed by the Congress. The police was given the power to arrest any person. Sardar Patel, the President of Congress and Gandhi were arrested, along with other congressmen.
What was the impact of the Statute of Westminster?
The Statute of Westminster passed through Parliament in 1931. This statute gave the dominions the autonomy to make their own laws and to govern themselves as they wished. The Governor-General in each of the dominions therefore, no longer had any legislative power. The role became that of a figurehead and their presence served as a reminder of the relationship these countries had to the crown and the commonwealth.
How did Colonial Services evolve?
In 1930, various sub services for administrating the colonies were merged into one Colonial Service. This provided a more centralised system for organising personnel within the service. As a result, recruits became more generalised in their skill-base and their administrative qualities improved. To work in the Colonial Service was quite prestigious and something middle-class people aspired to.
Public schools and top universities like Oxford and Cambridge churned out young men, normally trained in the humanities, who were ready for the Colonial Service entrance exams.
What was the Government of India Act, 1935?
The Government of India Act 1935 created a Federation of India by:
- making the provinces completely self-governing (although provincial governors were still to be appointed by the British, and the Viceroy could suspend self-government in emergencies)
- expanding the franchise from 7 to 35 million people.
How successful was the Government of India Act 1935?
The Act was opposed by the Congress Party because it fell short of the independence enjoyed by the White Dominions and because of a desire to be completely free of British rule. The Princely States also rejected a federal India, as they wanted to maintain their independence from the rest of India.