British Columbia v. BCGSEU Flashcards

You may prefer our related Brainscape-certified flashcards:
1
Q

What happened in 1992?

A

Tawney Meiorin was hired by the Province of British Columbia to fight forest fires.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
2
Q

For two years she did what?

A

Worked satisfactorily in her job

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
3
Q

What happened when the government adopted a series of tests that set minimum fitness standards for firefighters?

A

Meiorin failed to meet the aerobic standard test.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
4
Q

What did the test require?

A

Firefighters to run 2.4 km in 11 minutes.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
5
Q

What happened to Meiorin?

A

Made 4 attempts but missed the minimum standard by 49.4 seconds

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
6
Q

Why was she dismissed?

A

For failing to meet the required fitness standard.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
7
Q

What happened after Meiorin filed a grievance?

A

An arbitrator found that Meiorin had established a prima facie case of adverse-effect discrimination.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
8
Q

Why did the arbitrator find this?

A

The aerobic standard had a disprorportionate negative affect on women as a group.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
9
Q

What did the arbitrator accept?

A

Evidence of physiological differences between men and women.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
10
Q

What was the particular physiological difference?

A
  • Most women have lower aerobic capacity than men
  • Even extra training would not enable Meiorin to meet the aerobic standard.
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
11
Q

What did the government not provide?

A

Any credible evidence to indicate that the particular aerobic standard was required for a firefighter to carry out his or her job safely + efficiently.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
12
Q

What was the government unable to establish?

A

That the test was a bona fide occupational requirement or show that it had accommodated Meiroin to the point of undue hardship

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
13
Q

What did the arbitrator make an order to?

A

Reinstate Meiorin and directed that she receive compensation for lost wages and benefits.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
14
Q

Where was the case appealed to?

A

The Court of Appeal for British Columbia

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
15
Q

What happened to the arbitrator’s decision?

A

Overturned

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
16
Q

What did the Court of Appeal not distinguish?

A

Between direct or adverse-effect discrimination

17
Q

What did it hold?

A

As long as a standard was necessary for safe and efficient performance and the same standard applied to all individual testing, then there was no discrimination.

18
Q

Where was the case appealed to?

A

The Supreme Court of Canada