Britain: A changing political and economic environment. Flashcards
What happened in the 1918 general election?
- By 1918 Lloyd George, the liberal leader and PM, had effectively split the party. This was because after the coalition with the conservative starting in 1915, many people believed he had abandoned the principles of the liberal party and had become too close with the conservatives. The election of 1918 was fought between the Liberal-Conservative coalition and the labour and liberal opposition parties. The coalition won the election with a landslide victory with 459 seats, over 300 of which came from the conservative MPS, whereas the opposition liberals only won 36 seats, 235 less than the previous election.
Although the coalition was headed by a liberal PM, the conservatives within the coalition were by far the more popular political party.
What was Lloyd George perceived as initially?
In 1918 Lloyd George was a national hero. He was credited by much of the country as the ‘man who won the war’, and as the tough negotiator who would be able to represent Britain at the Paris Peace Conference. He was a man of humble origins from north Wales and had made it clear that he was an enemy of privilege and no friend to the House of Lords, an unelected body of hereditary peers that sat at the apex of Britain’s class system.
What was the scandal that ruined Lloyd George?
The news in June 1922 that he had been involved in a scandal selling knighthoods and peerages was deeply shocking. In the past, titles had been sold by government ministers to their supporters in industry for large donations, but it was done in a discreet and largely unnoticed fashion. Lloyd George’s trade in titles was run from a private office he established, and knowledge of the operation was widespread. During his six years as prime minister (1916-22) he sold 1,500 knighthoods and nearly a hundred peerages.
Several titles were freely given away to Fleet Street newspaper magnates, such as Lord Beaverbrook, so that they would turn a blind eye and not report the practice. When the 1922 honours list was announced there were several people on it who had criminal convictions for fraud and the press finally published the story. Lloyd George himself called the honours system corrupt, but the scandal did immense damage to his credibility
What was the issue with Lloyd George and Turkey?
His decision to go to war with Turkey, if it sought to revise the terms of the peace treaty it had been forced to sign in 1918, further dented his credibility; his Conservative coalition partners disagreed with the policy. This was because Britain had just recently emerged damaged from WW1, and the majority of the government were unwilling to put it through something similar so soon again. They decided that the looming crisis with Turkey was their opportunity to act.
How did the Liberal-Conservative coalition end?
A secret meeting of leading Conservatives was held at the Carlton Club, a private members club used by London political elites. At the meeting it was decided to abandon the coalition with the Liberals. As a result, the election of November 1922 was a disaster for the Liberals.
What happened in the 1922 election and why?
The conservatives won the election with 344 seats. Those led by Lloyd George (now the National Liberal Party) were reduced to 53 MPs, and while those opposition Liberals led by Herbert Asquith saw their share of the vote grow to give them 62 MPs, it was still too small an increase to prevent the party from further decline.
Lloyd George’s personal unpopularity by 1922 was partly the cause of the Liberals’ decline, but the growth in the popularity of the Labour Party had a much greater, long- term impact.
What was the first labour government?
The first Labour government was led by Ramsay MacDonald in 1924. It was a minority government and its election was seen as a deeply alarming development by many of the Conservative-supporting newspapers like The Times. The party was committed to parliamentary democracy and went to great lengths to demonstrate how moderate it was. Nonetheless, Labour’s opponents in the Conservative Party and the media liked to compare it to the repressive regime in Soviet Russia and suggested that there might be Soviet sympathisers among the cabinet.
What was one of the reasons why MacDonald’s government failed?
One of the main problems that MacDonald and his government encountered was strained relations with the National Executive Committee of the Labour Party itself. MacDonald was forced to make harsh economic choices that affected the poorest voters and had to manage the threat of industrial action. As prime minister he had to compromise, but the party was critical of him for not being more radical. Because he was the head of a minority government, dependent on Liberal support, any attempt to introduce a more radical programme would have resulted in a withdrawal of this support and the collapse of the government. The government lasted for nine months, too short a time to introduce much legislation.
How did the MacDonald’s Labour government collapse?
MacDonald’s government collapsed in the autumn of 1924 following a motion of no confidence which MacDonald only narrowly won. The motion against Labour came about following the decision of the Attorney General Sir Patrick Hastings to drop charges of incitement to mutiny against a socialist newspaper, the Worker’s Weekly. The newspaper had published an article by John Ross Campbell which broke the law by demanding that soldiers should turn their weapons onto the government, their ‘oppressors’.
On 6 August, under pressure from backbench Labour MPs, the prosecution against Campbell was withdrawn and MacDonald was accused by both Liberal and Conservative parties of having secret communist sympathies. The case coincided with his attempts to normalise relations between Britain and the Soviet Union. A second motion was passed against the government, calling for an official inquiry into the withdrawal of charges against Campbell. MacDonald was forced to resign and call an election
What happened before the 1924 general election?
Labour’s election campaign was marred by the publication of a damaging story in the Daily Mail.
The Conservative-supporting newspaper claimed that a letter from the Russian communist revolutionary Gregori Zinoviev to the British Communist Party had been discovered. The letter, a forgery, appeared to be an incitement to revolution, telling British communists to prepare to overthrow the government. The Daily Mail hoped it would dissuade people from voting for Labour or any other left-wing party.
What happened in the 1924 election?
Although the Labour vote didn’t collapse, still gaining 151 seats, it lost the election and the Conservative Party, under Stanley Baldwin, was able to form a majority, gaining 412 seats. This election was a defining moment for the Liberal Party as a declining force in British politics; it saw a 12 per cent decline in its share of the vote and a loss of 118 seats.
The Conservatives were the clear beneficiaries, taking seats from both the Liberal and Labour parties. First-time Labour voters in the previous election who were now disappointed with Ramsay MacDonald switched to the Conservatives, as did Liberal voters who had lost faith in the ability of the party to revive itself.
How did Baldwin appeal to all classes?
The new Conservative government formed by Stanley Baldwin presented itself as an alternative to the Labour Party and the ‘threat’ of socialism in Britain. However, Baldwin wanted to be seen by the country as a moderate politician who could appeal to all social classes. He believed that the rhetoric of ‘class war’ that had emerged during the brief MacDonald government was deeply damaging to Britain and he discouraged the Conservative Party from attacking Labour as secret agents of the USSR (which had been alleged in Conservative-supporting newspapers during MacDonald’s administration)
What were the reforms to Labour’s funding?
Despite Baldwin’s appeals to his party for peaceful coexistence with the Labour Party, many Conservative MPs still believed that the government should use all methods at its disposal to weaken it and the trade unions. In 1925 a private member’s bill to prevent the Labour Party from receiving a political levy from the trades unions, which would have financially crippled it, was opposed by Baldwin in the House of Commons and subsequently failed. He was more concerned with political stability than political conflict between the parties.
Baldwin’s conciliatory approach could not be sustained in the long run. Following the General Strike, he yielded to pressure to introduce laws reducing Labour’s funding from the unions. In the 1927 amendment to the 1906 Trade Disputes Act the political levy on union members could no longer be automatically deducted from their union membership and passed to the Labour Party; instead, members had to agree to pay it. Over one-third chose to opt out, causing the Labour Party’s finances to decrease by 35 per cent.
What happened in the 1929 General Election?
Labour won the election with 287 seats, more than any other party, but still not enough to form a parliamentary majority, forcing MacDonald to form another minority government. MacDonald returned to power but his government would not prove strong enough to weather the economic storms that were to break later in the year
What were Macdonald’s social reforms?
MacDonald had much more ambitious reforms planned in his second ministry than his first. His lack of an overall majority once again made him dependent on the Liberals to pass legislation, though he had a largely co-operative working relationship with them. As a result, the government was able to pass some social reforms:
• The 1930 Housing Act cleared three-quarters of a million slum houses and replaced them with modern homes by 1939.
• The Coal Mines Act of 1930 attempted to ensure better pay for workers and more efficient pits, but the weakness of the legislation ensured that the mine owners could ignore it.
• MacDonald amended the Unemployment Insurance Act, giving the government powers to create public works schemes to alleviate unemployment. It was funded with £25 million of government money.
The government was also limited in what it could achieve by the growing economic crisis. MacDonald referred to the next two years of crisis in Britain as an ‘economic blizzard’, and it had significant political repercussions as well.
What were the economic problems MacDonald faced in 1931?
During the summer of 1931 there were rumours that the forthcoming budget would be unbalanced - meaning that the government had plans to spend more than it could afford - leading to an increase in borrowing. This caused the banks in America to engage in panic selling of the pound, exchanging it for other currencies, and the pound slumped in value.
In order to reassure financiers that their investments were safe, the government proposed spending cuts and tax hikes, the main measure being the introduction of a 10 per cent cut in unemployment assistance. This would keep the value of the pound stable, but caused hardship for many of Britain’s poorest, the members of society that labour was supposed to represent. The threat of this cut split the Labour Party and MacDonald’s cabinet, leading the government to resign on 24 August 1931
Why was Macdonald’s government and Britain so reliant on American Banks?
The second Labour government under Ramsay MacDonald struggled to finance its spending commitments and, by 1931, came under intense pressure from international banks, particularly in the USA. The banks did not want the British government to spend large sums on welfare, even though unemployment in Britain was rising. These banks had significant power over Britain as they held large currency reserves of the British pound, due to the amount of debt Britain had accrued by borrowing from the USA to finance the war.
These banks could lose millions at a stroke if the value of the pound went down and so did not want to see economic policies introduced that might cause that to happen. A high- spending government would either have to tax or borrow, both actions that would reduce the pound’s value and cause the Gold Standard to be readjusted.
How was the national government formed?
After negotiating with the other main political parties, and at the urging of King George V, MacDonald formed a National Government from the three main parties with himself as prime minister. Both MacDonald and his chancellor of the exchequer, Lord Philip Snowden, were viewed as traitors to the Labour Party, which passed a motion expelling them. They formed a new National Labour Committee which was designed to sponsor Labour parliamentary candidates who supported the National Government
What was MacDonald’s premiership of the National Government like?
MacDonald’s premiership was dominated by the economic challenges caused by the Great Depression and attempts to alleviate it and effect an economic recovery. The government made some moves to rearm, given the increasingly threatening situation in Europe and the rise of fascism there. At the same time it had to deal with the threat of fascism at home.
What were MacDonald’s NG economic policies?
The National Government implemented the spending cuts which had caused the previous government’s downfall. Public sector pay cuts of 10 per cent were felt to be so harsh that they led to a mutiny in the Royal Navy at the naval base of Invergordon.
In addition to the spending cuts the National Government was able to introduce a limited number of tariffs. By 1933 the end of the Gold Standard and low interest rates had begun to stimulate an economic recovery (see page 31). The National Government’s popularity increased, even though MacDonald became increasingly isolated in the government and was replaced as prime minister by Stanley Baldwin in 1935
What was the labour party like in opposition to MacDonald’s NG?
The Labour Party managed to reorganise itself throughout the first half of the 1930s and become the official opposition to the government. Under its new leader, Clement Attlee, it managed to gain 154 seats at the 1935 General Election, demonstrating that the Labour vote was rapidly recovering from the slump in votes in 1931.
What was the growth of extreme political ideas under MacDonald NG?
Throughout the 1930s there was in increase in support for extreme ideas on both the far left and far right. Communist and fascist parties saw an increase in their membership as more people became convinced that liberal democracy no longer had the answers to the economic crisis.
• By 1934 the British Union of Fascists had 50,000 members.
• In the same year the Communist Party of Great Britain only had 9,000 members but throughout the 1930s organised the National Unemployed Workers Movement, which some historians have argued represented hundreds of thousands of unemployed men.
• Many intellectuals on the left, including Fabians Sidney and Beatrice Webb, visited the Soviet Union, believing that communism was an economic success. This had an impact on Britain from the 1930s onwards as these influential figures argued convincingly in favour of state planning.
Who was Oswald Mosley and what did he achieve?
Mosley, a labour MP, frustrated at the National Government, resigned and set up his own organisation - the New Party - in March 1931. Mosley’s New Party put forward a manifesto for change, titled the ‘Mosley Memorandum’, which temporarily attracted support from both the right and left. It demanded a co-ordinated national economic plan to deal with the economic crisis. Moderates from the Conservative and Labour parties who had supported him soon withdrew their backing when Mosley established his own group of violent enforcers called ‘Biff Boys’, who were given the task of attacking his opponents.
In 1932 Mosley drew all the fascist organisations in Britain together with the New Party to form the British Union of Fascists (BUF). The union’s impact on the political system overall would prove to be negligible, but it briefly presented a challenge to law and order. The National Government passed the Public Order Act in 1936, banning groups from wearing uniforms and requiring permission for marches and demonstrations. Mosley never became a threat to the National Government and his movement began to decline after 1936.
Even though his movement dissipated after 1936, Mosley’s BUF demonstrated that there were significant numbers of people (the movement had 50,000 members at its height) who did not believe the existing political system of parliamentary democracy was capable of working at the height of the depression.
How did Britain disarm and rearm during the 1930s?
From 1933 onwards many British people began to take a much more active interest in world events. The appointment of Adolf Hitler as chancellor opinion to divide betweller in Germany caused publicsent. With traumatic memories of the previous war, hundreds of thousands of people were attracted to organisations such as the Peace Pledge Union, and the League of Nations Union that supported peaceful resolution to conflicts.
By the early 1930s, the idea that Germany had been solely responsible for the First World War was rejected by most British politicians and civil servants. Instead a different view prevailed, one which blamed arms races and secret treaties. The government negotiated with other powers to disarm at the World Disarmament Conference, which ran for two years between 1932 and 1934. However, the conference broke down in 1933 when Germany withdrew expressing its right to rearm to levels equal to France, Britain and the USA. Following Germany’s exit, Baldwin argued not for disarmament but for agreements limiting arms so that nations could have ‘parity’.
Breain started to rearm from 1934 onwards
The RAF was increased in to 40 squadrons, a recognition of the importance of air power in future conflicts.
The British Army was reorganised.
• The Royal Navy was expanded
• The munitions industry was developed in partnership with private capital.