Britain 1951-64 Flashcards
Who was Hugh Gaitskell?
Labour party Leader/Leader of the opposition from 1955-63
Who was R.A Butler?
Deputy Prime Minister to Eden + Macmillan
Strong party leader of promoting post war consensus
What kind of Conservative was Butler?
Encouraged the party to become more progressive, and modernised the party’s attitude and policy
- ie Education Act 1944
How did the Education Act (1944) support the idea that Butler was a progressive, left leaning Conservative?
- The act outlined a tripartite system
- Introduced to tackle Beveridge’s giants (ignorance)
- Represented modern change in society
Why was Butler an important Conservative figure between 1945-51?
- Had a key role in restoring Conservative morale, encouraging recovery after 1945 defeat
- Prevented Labour from being known as more modern than the Conservatives by trying to modernise Conservative policies
What is the significance of Butler’s ‘Industrial Charter’
(1947)?
- Represented the modernisation of the party’s policies
- Highlighted the importance of trade unions (more left wing) and suggested a mixed economy of private and state-directed industries
What is ‘Butskellism’?
The feeling of Post war consensus between the 2 parties, leading a more Central party (Labour right + Conservative left)
What were reasons for Labour’s defeat in the 1951 election?
Labour weaknesses
Conservative advantages
What were the Labour weaknesses causing their defeat in the 1951 election?
- Atlee’s government was worn down by heavy economic and financial difficulties
- Collectively and individually, government was exhausted after 6 troubled years in office
- A number of ministers, ie Atlee himself, Herbert Morrison and Ernest Bevin were working continuously since 1940
- Serious divisions between the right and left of the party over economic, welfare and foreign policy
- Resentment amongst some trade unions at Labour’s slowness in responding to worker demands
- Shrinking of their majority in 1950 election made it hard to govern and damaged party morale
- Labour found it difficult to shake off image as party of rationing, austerity, and high taxation-> unhappy electorate
- Britain’s entry to Korean war in 1950 angered Labour left wing, essentially following USA in Cold WAR engagement
What were the Conservative strengths leading to Labour’s defeat in the 1951 election?
- Reorganisation of the party by Lord Woolton, reforming its finances + constituency organisation-> in a better position to fight for seats and votes compared to 1945
- Young Tory MPs (ie R.A Butler) bringing new ideas to the party
- Conservatives had begun to recover from shock of 1945 defeat
- 1950 election saw influx of bright young Conservative MPs eager for battle against a tiring government
- attack on government nationalisation of iron and steel provided strong platform for opposition attacks
What were the 1951 election results?
Conservatives- 321 seats
48% vote
Majority of 17
Labour- 48.8% vote (won the popular vote by 0.8%)
295 seats
Labour got more votes but less seats
What is the explanation of vote share in the 1951 election?
- Labour added 2 million votes between 1945-51
- Conservatives added nearly 4 million + Liberal party only put up 109 candidates, drop of 366 compared to 1950-> nearly 2 million ex-Liberal voters went largely to Conservatives
- Due to FPTP system, even though Labour got more votes, they lost the election due to seat share.
What significant things happen in 1957?
UK first hydrogen bomb tested
Homicide Act
Rent Act
What significant things happened in 1958?
Life peerages introduced
What significant things happened in 1959?
Conservatives won general election. Britain became founding member of EFTA
What significant events happened in 1960?
Macmillan’s winds of change speech
Labour party adopted unilateralism
What significant events happened in 1962?
Commonwealth immigration Act.
Cuban missile crisis
What significant events happened in 1963?
Britain’s application to join EEC vetoed by France
Profumo affair
Macmillan retired
Douglas-Home Conservative PM until 1964
What was Macmillan’s social background?
Macmillan came from a middle class background (Publishing business)
- Married into the upper class
What type of Conservative attitude did Macmillan have?
Macmillan, like Butler, is sometimes described as a one nation conservative. A ‘one nation’ conservative is another name for a centrist or left Conservative.
He thought they should give more provisions to the poor
What were the good social developments between 1957-63 under Macmillan?
- Education…
- spread of comps
- the Robins Report (1963
- Class and Social Mobility
- Housing and Living Standards
How did Macmillan impact Housing and Living Standards between 1957-63? (pos)
Committed to build 300,000 houses annually
1951-54: achieved the target
By 64: they claimed they built 1.7 million houses, 60% being private
Rent Act 1957: abolished rent control, put 6 million properties on the market
- Rents rose considerably
- Difficult for tenants at the lower end to afford leases
- Macmillan felt he had to do this to stimulate the rented property market
More ease with money being borrowed and repaid over long periods of time
- Encouraged by government-> banks and building societies advanced capital in the form of mortgages, allowing increasing numbers to own their own homes (thought more people would vote Conservative as home owners)
How did Macmillan impact Education between 1957-63? (pos)
- The Robin’s report 1963 expanded Universities
- Some Conservatives opposed the spread of comprehensives
Boyle (minister of education 62-64) pushed for the abolition of the 11+, and for better education for all children
More comprehensives schools were built under Conservatives than under Labour
Why was the spread of Comprehensive schools good/Why were grammar schools bad?
- 11+ was unreliable
- Undervalued children who failed
- Selection was socially divisive
- Larger shares of funds went to top layers of schools, leaving lower layers impoverished
- Bright pupils formed as well academically in comprehensive as they did grammar
- Takes away wealth leading to education- social class all mixed together
Grammar schools received more funding, unfair
Middle class children would pass more (tendency) as they were more prepared for it
Why were Grammar schools good/Comprehensive schools bad?
- No alternative to bad comprehensive if grammar schools abolished
- Sets are still in Comprehensive, so still separated
- Smart children from disadvantaged backgrounds do not have any alternative and cannot move unlike wealthy parents
- Comprehensive denied children from disadvantaged backgrounds to benefit from school education fitted to their needs
- Quality of schools depended on the area they were situated-> would just be replaced by a poor comprehensive
- Wealthier parents could move to let children go to better comprehensives, poorer parents couldn’t, now changing to selection by parental income
How did Macmillan impact Class and Social Mobility between 1957-63? (pos)
○ The increased availability of financial credit meant poorer people could spend more, so generally had more possessions - as did increased production due to higher consumer demand.
How did the importance of class decrease?
○ The war weakened class divisions due to shared wartime experience
○ The welfare state
○ People generally became much richer during the 1950s and 1960s, blurring class distinctions
How did social mobility not change from 1957-63?
People would still see things through the lens of class - for example, lower-middle class people who earned less than some of the wealthier working class people still saw themselves as socially superior.
What was Britain’s industrial state under Macmillan, from Eden?
Britain wasn’t producing quality products at a high enough quantity (late 50’s, early 60’s= heavily industrial country)
- Germany + Japan had to restart after WW2, rebuilt the countries post invasion with new technology and innovation + ideas in mind