Breach of Duty Flashcards

You may prefer our related Brainscape-certified flashcards:
1
Q

what is the test for breach of duty

A

the reasonable man test

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
2
Q

describe the reasonable man test

A

an objective test to see if a reasonable man of ordinary levels of skills/ knowledge would act the same in that situation

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
3
Q

are special characteristics taken into account for the rmt

A

no

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
4
Q

what are the 3 special characteristics and the cases associated with them

A

learners (Nettleship v Weston)
professionals (Bolam Principle)
children (Mullin v Richards)

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
5
Q

what are learners compared to

A

fully qualified people

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
6
Q

what are professionals compared to

A

ordinary skilled members of the same profession

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
7
Q

what are children compared to

A

ordinary children of the same age

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
8
Q

what happened in Nettlship v Weston

A

C injured while teaching D to drive, Weston liable and compared to qualified driver

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
9
Q

what happened in Bolam v Frierm HMC

A

C went under electro convulsive therapy and suffered fractures even tho relaxants should’ve reduced the risk but the practice was accepted by other doctors

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
10
Q

what happened in Mullins v Richards

A

two 15 yo girls playing with rulers, one snapped and one girl was blinded, not liable due to age

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
11
Q

what case established breach of duty

A

Blyth v Birmingham Waterworks co (1856)

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
12
Q

what happened in Blyth v Birmingham Wateeworks co

A

BWco lay water pipes around Birmingham, 25 years after installation the water main spring a leak however no bod

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
13
Q

what are the 4 risk factors and the cases associated with them

A

1) degree of damage (Bolton v Stone)
2) potential seriousness of harm ( Paris v Stephneh BC)
3) Cost and Practicality ( Latimer v AEC)
4) Social Utility ( Watt v Herefs CC )

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
14
Q

what happened in Bolton v Stone

A

C injured standing on road hit with cricket ball, unlikely so not liable

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
15
Q

what happened in Paris v Stephney BC

A

C blind in one eye, company didn’t provide welding goggles, metal went into eye so completely blind, liable

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
16
Q

what happened in Latimer v AEC

A

factory flooded sawdust used to reduce the effects, employee fell injured but not liable bc they couldn’t shut down while factory

17
Q

what happened in Watt v Herefs CC

A

person trapped under vehicle so fire service sent lorry but fireman injured by equipment en route, saving life justifies risk so not liable

18
Q

what are the 3 parts to establish Res Ispa Loquitur

A

1) the thing that caused damage was under D’s sole control
2) incident is one which wouldn’t have happened unless there was negligence
3) there is no other obvious reason the incident occurred

19
Q

what is the case for Res Ispa Loquitur

A

Scott v London and St Katharine Docks Co

20
Q

what happened in Scott v London and St Catharine Do ks Co

A

C has 6 bags of sugar dropped on him by crane that’s under control of the warehouse; only obvious reason is negligence