Bowlby's theory Flashcards
According to Bowlby, why do we attach?
we have an innate biological drive to imprint due to an evolutionary survival instinct which requires a duel direction attachment from the mother and the infant to secure the infants protection
What are Bowlby’s 3 key ideas on how we attach?
- critical period (sensitivity to infant)
- social releasers (innate response to infant for its survival)
- monotopy (special primary attachment)
what is meant by ‘the critical period’
- happens during 3-6 months
- it is when an attachment forms
- the mother’s response and sensitivity to the infants needs in this period determined how closely attached they were
- if the infant had no opportunity to attach in this period they will have difficult attaching in the future
what is meant by ‘social releasers’
- social releases are behaviours or characteristics the infant has in order to draw the caregiver in which enables an attachment to form
- having a cute ‘baby face’ and smiling are social releases which draw the caregiver in
- these social releases are innate in the infant because the caregiver needed to be attached in order to protect the infant from predators/harm, and so infants evolved to have social releases
what is meant by ‘monotropy’
- monotropy suggests that infants form primary attachments to one individual
- this is usually the mother
- this is important in ensuring the safety of the infant
What are the consequences of attachment according to Bowlby
• the internal working model (how we view the world)
- monotropic attachments influence our relationship expectations & it allows infants to change caregiver behaviour to fit their needs
• the continuity hypothesis (emotionally secure infants go on to be emotionally secure adults)
Positives of Bowlby’s theory
- Sroufe at all supported the continuity hypothesis
- Ainsworth also notes the importance of sensitivity and the level of attachment
- Lorenz’s geese study also found that there was a critical period
- The critical period theory could support that attachment/imprinting is innate because it is adaptive to the infants needs e.g infant exploration starts after 6 months and so an attachment before then in necessary to keep them safe (opposes the learning theorists argument)
Negatives of Bowlby’s theory
- Schaffer and Emerson’s multiple attachment stage opposes monotropy
- learning theorists argue that food is more important than sensitivity during the formation of attachments
- rutter et al suggests attachments after the critical period are still possible even if they are unlikely so it isn’t actually ‘critical’