biospychology 16 markers Flashcards
A03 for localisation
Dick and trembley 2016 (2% of modern researchers think language…), due to new and advanced techniques show activation in r.h in areas like thalamus, have evolved to be accurate leads to rejection of B.A+ W.A, therefore research is outdated
Lashley 1950 (rats) equipottentiality theory
Dougherty et al 2002 neurosurgery= treating mental disorders, cingultomy= isolating and removing cingulaye gyrus (OCD) 30% successful 14% slightly successful, should be 100%
Phineas gage 1848
16 marker on laterisation A03
Sprerrys studies (1950’s)- provided empirical evidence that lh= speech rh=visual navigation, (strengths+ weaknesses of controlled lab experiments)
Kim peek case study, overexemplifcation on degree of laterisation+ population validity is a no
Turk et al 2002- conducted case study on patient jw who had hemisphectory and was learned to speak with his RH, highlights movement induced therapy, gives research credibility however goes against sperry
Neilsent et al 2013- LH as anylser RH as synthesiser= wrong, 1000 brain scans of 7-29 year olds, no dominant side
A03 plasticity
Magurie et al 2000 provided empirical evidence+ positive correlation= more reliable
Davidson et al 2004- monks who meditate frequently show greater gamma way activity (linked to neural coordination) may become more aware of
Kuhn et al 2014- more grey matter in hippocampus after p played 30 mins of mario for 2 months = experience induces placsticy
Draginski et al 2006 medical students= increase grey matter before exams due to intensive studying
A03 rehabilitation
neuro rehabilitation activation- constraint induced movement therapy for stroke patients, new discoveries= more research, supported by plata et al 2018 who found targeted motar rehabilitation= yes
sneider et al 2014= 40% 16 years+ of education 10% 12 years less of education, promotes cognitive reserve and education
Tajiri et al 2013 and Banejeer et al 2014 HEARTBREAKING GENERALISABILTY
elbert et al 1995 =younger= better
16 marker on circadian rythms
Bolovin et al 1996= poor adjustment= more accidents and lower productivity, understanding= reduce workplave error, lead to melatonin products or increased lighting HOWEVER may be expensive and lead to long term commitment from employees
Siffre 1972 provide valuable insight but lack real world complexity (siffre 1972 findings) ecological validity+ applicability, HOWEVER feild stufies like solomon 1993 decrease gap
Practical application-chronotheraputics-Krustson 2003, Bonteh et al 2015, HOWEVER lead to more night shifts
16 marker on expgenous zeitgibers
Campbell and murphy 1998, light pad feins
(15 parcticapnts,deviation of 3 hours)
Siffre 1972= circadian is adaptable not fixed
Klein and wegman 1974= jet lag
babies
Laughten et al 1997= blind man 24.9 hours despite social cues
16 marker on infaradian and ultradian rythms
Stern and mclinktok 1998 - menustration psychle due to pheremones, 9 women+20 women,68% changes to cycle, eveloutianry viewpoint, schank 2004 argues this is maladaptive, and trevathan says lesbain couples don’t synchronise (relationship problems?)
Penton volk et al least fertile=feminine most fertile=masculine
Haider 1970 drug overdose=n5
Shaprio 1981 drug overdose=r3 sleep
