Biological therapies- drug therapy Flashcards
What is the biological approach to treating sz
- drug therapy- this is the prime treatment
- treatment based on dopmaine hypothesis- theory that sz is linked to increased dopamine activity in brain
What are typical antipsychotics
- developed in 1950s
- less widely used today due to their side effects- they mainly appear to treat the positive symptoms and their side effects can be severe e.g dry mouth, blurred vision, dizziness, muscle spasms, cramps, tremors
Main form of typical antipsychotic- what is it and how does it work
- chloropromazine
- works by blocking dopamine receptors- results later in elevated levels of dopamine metabolism as feedback signal increases release of dopamine, which is broken down in synpase
- treats positive symptoms e.g. hallucinations, delusions
- reduces action of NT
Research for typical antipsychotics- Frude (1998)
- suggests typical antipsychotics have a positive effect on treatment of patients- meaning they did not have to permanently stay in a mental institution
- only 3% of 300,000 sufferes were permanent residents- before this all were hospitalised
- evidence that typical antipsychotics are effective treatment
- economic implications- more able to work
What are atypical antipsychotics and how do they work
- introduced in 1970s as a result of adverse side effects of typical antipsychotics
- work differently to typical as only attach to specific dopamine receptors
- act on serotonin and dopamine receptors- helps to improve mood and reduce depression, anxiety and improve cognitive functioning
- improve negative symptoms e.g. expressed emotion
Negative of atypical antipsychotics
- serious side effects e.g. blood clot
- increased risk of stroke
- even though there may be fewer than typical, the side effects are more sever
Example of atypical antipsychotic
- clozapine- binds to dopamine receptors but also works on serotonin and glutamate receptors
- improves negative symptoms e.g. reduced emotional expression
- prescribed if patient is at suicide risk
Developed atypical antipsychotic- risperidone
- recently developed and aims to overcome negative side effects linked to clozapine
- binds more strongly to receptors- leads to fewer side effects
Research by Kahn et al (2008)
- evidence that atypical are not more effective than typical
- these drugs were compared and they were both found to be effective for at least one year
Research to back up Kahn- Stargarat et al (2008)
- found no difference between two drugs in relapse rate
- suggests that one drug is not necessarily better and they both work well for treating sz
- however individual differences may mean that some respons better than others
AO3- individual differences
- some may respond differently to the drug or have more/less severe side effects
- most people will expereince some short term side effects e.g. weight gain however this doesnt make typical or atypical more effective than one another
- they cannot always be used to treat sz effecively- another treatment e.g. CBT may be needed
AO3- atypical and positive symptoms
- atypical more effective for treating positive symptoms as well as reducing negative symptoms
- BUT they have serious side effcrs e,g, agranulocytosis
AO3- typical
- have more side effects e.g. tardive dyskensia, dry mouth, constipation
- but these are less severe
- by keeping medication to a minimum, less side effects can occur but possibility of relapse
- this means it may take a long time to treat sz as there is the risk of sz
advanatges of biological treatments
- drug therapy more effective at reducing positive symptoms
- successful for large number of patients with sz, meaning more people can live in community- economical implications!!!!
- widely used and effective
disadvantages of biological treatmenta
- treats symptoms but not cause
- symptoms come back if people stop taking antipsychotic drugs- leads to ‘revolving door phenomenon’- patients constantly being disharged and re admitted to hospitals