Beyond Budgeting Flashcards
Traditional budgeting (TB) has long been central
Traditional budgeting (TB) has long been central to organizational management, but its relevance is increasingly questioned due to its rigidity, inefficiency, and inability to meet the needs of fast-paced and dynamic environments.
Beyond Budgeting (BB) has emerged as an alternative
Beyond Budgeting (BB) has emerged as an alternative approach, promising greater flexibility, decentralization, and responsiveness.
This essay evaluates the
This essay evaluates the criticisms of TB and assesses how BB addresses these issues, referencing academic and practitioner research.
TB is criticized for
TB is criticized for its rigidity and focus on annual cycles, which often fail to adapt to changing market conditions.
Ekholm and Wallin (2000) argue that TB (const. reson. rather than innov.)
Ekholm and Wallin (2000) argue that TB constrain organizational responsiveness and promote incremental thinking rather than innovation.
These budgets are also time-consuming (assumpt. guesswork)
These budgets are also time-consuming to prepare and update, often based on assumptions and guesswork that may lack relevance in dynamic environments.
Wallander (1999) goes further, (“unnecessary evil”)
Wallander (1999) goes further, deeming budgets as an “unnecessary evil,” as they focus on cost reduction rather than value creation.
Another major criticism is that TB (gaming manip.) (Hope & Fraser, 2003)
Another major criticism is that TB fosters perverse behaviours, such as gaming and manipulation of targets (Hope & Fraser, 2003).
Managers may pad budgets to
Managers may pad budgets to secure easier targets or spend unnecessarily to justify next year’s allocations.
Armstrong (2011) highlights the human cost (managerial bullying, stress demotiv.)
Armstrong (2011) highlights the human cost of these systems, observing how budget controls can become tools of managerial bullying, creating stress and demotivation among employees.
BB offers a progressive framework
BB offers a progressive framework to overcome the limitations of TB.
Hope and Fraser (2000) emphasize its two core (adaptive + decentralised)
Hope and Fraser (2000) emphasize its two core principles: adaptive management processes and decentralized decision-making.
Instead of rigid annual budgets, (employs rolling forecasts flexible targets, adapt quickly)
Instead of rigid annual budgets, BB employs rolling forecasts and flexible targets, enabling firms to adapt quickly to changing circumstances.
This model also emphasizes decentralization, empowering (real-time info)
This model also emphasizes decentralization, empowering local managers to make decisions based on real-time information rather than adhering to centrally determined budgets.
Hope and Fraser (2003) illustrate this through the case of Svenska Handelsbanken, (delegating decision-making to local branches & using)
Hope and Fraser (2003) illustrate this through the case of Svenska Handelsbanken, which operates without TB and achieves superior performance by delegating decision-making to local branches and using external benchmarks for evaluation.