Beliefs In Society Flashcards
What is a belief system?
Any set of ideas and beliefs that people use to make sense of the world around them
How did people use to understand the world?
Traditionally, people made sense of the world through supernatural explanations
How do people make sense of the world in more recent years?
It is more common to understand the world based on scientific evidence.
However some people do put their faith in both religious and non-religious ideologies
What did Karl Popper differentiate?
Differentiated science from religion on the basis that religion was a closed belief system while science was an open belief system.
What makes religion a closed belief system according to Popper?
Religion claimed a monopoly on the truth accepting no criticism or opportunity for development
Why did Popper believe science was an open belief system?
It constantly opened itself up to criticism and testing and constantly sought to discover new knowledge
What is ideology?
Ideology doesn’t have a single, clear definition and is used in a variety of ways. It’s most common use is to describe a broad, cohesive set of political ideas and beliefs (e.g liberalism, socialism, conservatism etc)
What is the Marxist concept of ideology?
Word to describe a set of ideas and beliefs that are dominant in society and are used to justify the power and privilege of the ruling class - negative concept of ideology: ideology is used to obscure the truth, give people a false picture of how the world works in order to control and manipulate them
Who is the Marxist view of ideology shared with?
Shared by many feminists who argue that it is patriarchal ideology that maintains the dominant role of men in society.
According to radical feminists, how does ideology maintain the dominant role of men in society?
By convincing women that patriarchy is natural, normal, or even desirable
What do Marxists argue about the proletariat?
If the proletariat really understood the exploitative nature of capitalist society and their place within it, there would be revolution.
What prevents revolution?
Ideology - a set of ideas that creates an illusion - it convinced the workers that capitalism is fair, that they are not being exploited by the system and those who are wealthy have worked hard and deserve their success
How is ideology reinforced according the Marxists? (Althusser)
Marxists argue ideology is reinforced by a wide range of institutions in society (what Althusser called IDEOLOGICAL STATE APPARATUS)
Evaluation of the Marxist view of ideology?
• Karl Popper argued the Marxist view of ideology is impossible so study scientifically, because it’s effects are impossible to falsify.
• some neo-Marxists suggest the idea that the working class don’t know their own mind and have been indoctrinated by bourgeois ideology is patronising and disempowering. Many feminists take a similar view regarding the idea that women have been brainwashed by patriarchal ideology and therefore don’t know what they want.
• the suggestion in traditional Marxist approaches is that there’s just 1 ideology in society, but some neo-Marxists argue that this is just the dominant one. There are other competing sets of ideas in society.
Is religion an ideology?
Religion is also a set of ideas and beliefs about the world - Yes
How do Marxists view religion?
See religion as being one important part of bourgeois ideology
How does religion act in theocratic states like Iran or Saudi Arabia?
Religion acts precisely like an ideology
What are the 3 main approaches to defining religion?
- Substantive
- Functional
- Social constructionist
What did Max Weber (1905) do?
Weber used a substantive definition of religion, seeing it as a belief in a supernatural power that is unable to be scientifically explained - whether a belief can be considered religious or not depends on the substance of what is believed.
Functional definition of religion?
Defines religion by the social or psychological functions it persons for individuals in society. In this definition, a belief or organisation could provide certain functions e.g to encouraging social cohesion without necessarily including supernatural beliefs.
THIS DEFINITION USED BY FUNCTIONALISTS SUCH AS DURKHEIM OR PARSONS
Where does a social constructionist definition of religion come from?
Comes from interpretivist sociologists
What do interpretivist sociologists argue about religion?
There are so many different types of religion that it is impossible to come up with a single, undisputed definition.
what is science?
There is no universally agreed definition of science. I’m sociology, it is generally understood to be value-free, objective, unbiased and rigorous, based on empirical evidence and facts, tested by experiments, rather than being based on faith - something based on knowledge rather than belief.
What are the differences between science and religion?
• science is an open belief system, religion is a closed belief system
• science is subject to falsification and testing, religion is accepted on blind faith
• science is independent of state/government, religion is often closely linked to the state
What does Thomas Kuhn point out?
Science operates within a paradigm
What does it mean if science operates within a paradigm?
There is a set of assumptions about the world which new scientific theories and discoveries have to fit into
What happens when scientists propose theories that don’t fit into the existing paradigm?
It’s not accepted unless there’s sufficient evidence for a paradigm shift.
EXAMPLE - any new scientific discoveries need to fit into a paradigm that accepts that theories such as evolution or gravity are true
What idea does religion reject?
Rejects the existence of fossils as it undermines the creation story in the Bible
What does some theories being rejected as unscientific mean?
Maybe science is not such an open belief system as is suggest
Evidence that religion isn’t as closed as it’s presented?
Some religious organisations have changed their position in certain issues (e.g allowing women to become priests, changing attitudes towards sexual orientation etc)
How may science be argued as not being objective?
Not only is science conducted within a paradigm that is very resistant to challenge, it’s also dependent on funding from various sources meaning research is often conducted with a view to reach a particular outcome that will assist the sale of a particular product
EXAMPLE - scientists funded by oil companies have often been those to reach a conclusion questioning the extent of man-made climate change
Evidence that religion isn’t as closely linked to the state as presented to be?
Although in the UK there’s still an official state role for the Church of England, for the most part religion in western liberal democracies is no longer as closely linked with the government
Evidence that science is less independent on the government than presented?
There are often government scientists and scientific advice e.g on health issues, which is often pushed quite forcefully by the state and through the law
What are belief systems essentially the product of?
The product of socialisation - a set of norms and values that are widely shared.
This is particularly the case with the Marxist concept of ideology. Various institutions, including religious organisations, transmit the bourgeoisie ideology, and this then becomes an accepted common sense among people.
Functionalists describe a similar process only seeing the outcome as a widely beneficial shared set of norms and values.
What are functionalist views on the role of religion?
Functionalists argue that religion is a conservative force and that this is a positive function for society and for individuals. They believe religion helps to create social order and maintains the value consensus.
What do Durkheim, Parsons and Bellah argue?
Argue that religion performs important functions for society
What does Malinowski argue?
Argues that it performs an important function for the individual
What do all functionalists agree about?
All agree that religion promotes stability and helps to preserve the status quo and prevent the upheaval and rapid social change
What did Durkheim conduct a study of?
Conducted a study of the Arunta, an Australian Aboriginal tribe’s religious beliefs in order to establish the function of the beliefs and ceremonies and what is really signified. He argued that society divided into objects and activities into the sacred and the profane.
The programs were everyday experiences with a clear function, while the sacred had a greater, collective significance.
From his detailed study of ‘primitive religion’ he identified 4 key fictions of religion in society
What were the 4 key functions of religion in society that Durkheim identified?
- Discipline
- Cohesion
- Vitalising
- Euphoric
Discipline meaning?
Religious rituals impose self-discipline, which encourages individual to behave sociably and not simply pursue their own selfish course of action, which would be anti-social and destabilising
Cohesion meaning?
The key function is social cohesion: worship brought the community together. Through worship people reaffirm and reinforce the bonds that keep them together
Vitalising meaning?
Durkheim also argued that religious belief maintained traditions, ensuring that the values that are passed down from generation to generation are kept vital and at the heart of the society
Euphoric definition?
If members of society were ever to become frustrated or lose their faith, the religion serves to remind them of their place in something much bigger. Again, it prevents individuals from becoming anti-social
What did Durkheim conclude?
Concluded that when society came together to worship collectively, what they were really worshipping was society itself. Durkheim recognised that society was becoming less religious and more secular, but he argued that there was still secular function for religious belief
What did Bellah (1967) argue about some modern secular states?
Argued that in some modern secular states, people worshipped society in a clear way without supernatural element of traditional religions.
What was Bellahs example of people worshipping society in a clear way in secular modern states?
His example is Americanism
America’s religious symbols are the flag, national anthem, famous historical figures etc
While this might not fit everyone’s definition of religion, it performs the same functions that Durkheim identified and promotes social cohesion, order, stability, and prevents radical change, again acting as a conservative force.
People can all unite around ideas of the death of royal family members (e.g Princess Diana) or the idea of ‘god bless America’ without necessarily all worshipping the same god, or practising the same religion.
What did Parsons argue about religion and socialisation?
Argued that religions quite directly socialised people into shared values, which were often stated quite directly by the religion, such as the 10 Commandments in Judaism and Christianity.
He further argued that religion answers the ultimate questions e.g why do good people suffer or die young - religions can offer answers in terms of tests of faith and rewards in the afterlife - gives meaning to what might otherwise seem a meaningless existence
What did Malinowski (1954) study?
Studied the religious practice of the Trobriand islanders. He noted that when the islanders were wishing on inshore, safe waters they did not practice religious ceremonies but they did when finishing on more dangerous waters. He concluded that religion had a psychological function: it helped individuals to deal with an anxious and stressful situation. These sort of unpredictable events can cause instability and disruption in society, so by performing this psychological function, religion also helped preserve the stability of society.
In this way religion performs psychological functions for the individual
Evaluation of functionalist views on the role of religion?
• Worsley (1956) has criticised Durkheim’ saying of the Arunta suggesting that he misunderstood certain aspects of the religion, particularly the idea of the separation between the sacred and profane and the significance of totems
• Functionalist theories are outdated and arguably tell us little about religion today. They envisage a society with a single unifying religion that brought people together? Whereas in most developed, western societies today there is no consensus about religion. Even in countries where there is a state religion and significant levels of religiosity, religion is often a major factor in conflict, such as in serval Middle Eastern countries.
• Malinowski’s study was unusual for a functionalist in that it was a participant observation. This was high in validity and very detailed, conducted over 4 years. However, from positivist perspective, it was unreliable and the conclusions couldn’t be generalised to other tribes or societies.
• some would argue describing ‘Americanism’ as a religion stretches the definition of religion too far. It is clear that patriotism or nationalism does functions as a form of belief system or ideology and that it may well carry out some of the functions that Durkheim, Parsons or Malinowski ascribe to religion. However, is that enough for something to be considered religious, or does it not require some sort of supernatural element to it?
How to Marxists describe the role of religions?
Marx described religion as the opiate of the masses.
What did Marx mean by the saying ‘opiate of masses’?
Religion acted like a drug, cushioning the workers from the true misery of being exploited in capitalist society.
What did Marx believe about proletariat?
Proletariat should rise up against the bourgeoisie in a revolution. Religion was one of the ways in which the bourgeoisie maintained control: part of the ideology.
What did Lenin refer to religion as?
Spiritual gin
What did Lenin argue?
He argued that the ruling class used religion cynically to create a mystical fog which obscured reality for the working class - very similar to the idea of it being an opiate.
What does Louie Althusser argue that religion is a part of?
Argues religion is a part of the ideological state apparatus. Along with education and the media, it transmits the dominant ideology and maintains false class consciousness
Not all Marxists have the same perspective. What does Engels suggest?
Suggested that religion had a dual character, performing this conservative function but also having the potential to drive social change.
Evaluation of Marxists views on the role of religion?
• Marxist and functionalist views are in one resort very similar. They observe religion as preforming a similar function, but one sees it as a positive thing and the other as a negative thing - means some of the criticisms of functionalist view are equally applicable to Marxist view: where religious practice is a minority pursuit (western democracies) religion doesn’t have the power to act as an opium of the masses or as a spiritual gin. Sports or celebrity gossip is more likely to preform that role today.
• many of the teachings of various religions appear to contradict the values of capitalism - they can contradict the idea that wealth is admirable and earned and the rich are people to feel deference towards. Other religions have similar teachings, criticising the greedy and praising the lowly. Whole a rejection of materialism might have the impact that traditional Marxists suggest it could also encourage people to see the ruling class and capitalists as ungodly. This is why neo-Marxists consider the possibility that religion could have a dual character and could act as a conservative force or catalyst for change
Feminist views on the role of religion?
Most feminists argue along similar lines to functionalists and Marxists that religion acts as a conservative force, maintaining the status quo. For feminists, the status quo is a patriarchal society.
How did Simone De Beauvoir view religion?
Saw it as exploiting and oppressing women. She argued that religious faiths encouraged women to be meek, put up with inequality, exploitation and suffering and doing so will bring rewards in the afterlife
In what ways can religion promote patriarchy?
• through religious scripture/teachings
• through religious ceremonies and practices
• through the structure and power-relations of religious organisations
Examples of patriarchy in scripture and teachings?
• in several religions, women are presented as temptresses who distract men from the serious business of worship. In the bible, it is the first woman, Eve, who disobeys god and then goes in to tempt Adam and bring about his downfall too
• in many religious teachings across a wide range of religions, women are given the role of nurturing, caring and giving birth. While these roles are presented positively and as essential, they reinforce the gender norms in society and the patriarchal power structures. If women choose not to conform to gender stereotypes, they are not only deviating from gender norms but deviation from God’s will too.
• religious texts are full of male gods
Example of patriarchy in ceremonies and practices?
• in several religious organisations men and women worship separately
• in many religions both menstruation and pregnancy are treated as impure or ungodly e.g in Islam, women who are menstruating aren’t allowed to tough the Koran
Example of patriarchy in religious organisations?
• there is a traditional gender division of Labour in many religious organisations with an expectation that women will serve tea and cakes after the service
• although some religious organisations do have women in senior positions, they are certainly the exception rather than the rule, and in most cases this is the result of relatively recent reforms.
Evaluation of feminist views on the role of religion?
• not all feminists agree that religion is essentially patriarchal, arguing that many early religions featured prominent goddesses and other female figures. Instead they argue that patriarchal societies have changed religions in order to ensure they reflect and reinforce patriarchal values.
Armstrong (1993) argued it was the development on monotheistic religions which imbued religion with a patriarchal and sexiest core - various goddesses were replaced with male prophets.
• Linda Woodhead argues that religion is not necessarily sexiest or patriarchal and writes of a ‘religious feminism’. She argues that many Muslim women choose to wear a veil and see it is a positive and liberating choice.
• others have suggested that religion is becoming increasingly female-dominated, particularly in western democracies. Attendance at religious services is much more common among women.
Evaluation of the view that religion acts a conservative force?
• overall, religion can only act as a conservative force if most people in society believe in it, and indeed if most people in society believe the same things. Secularisation and diversity in contemporary society significantly undermines this role for religion, whether you see it in a positive light (functionalists) or negative force (Marxists & Feminists). Religion can only engender a collective conscience or a false consciousness through widespread faith. As such, many argue that the idea that religion acts as a conservative force is an outdated one.
• religious beliefs are not always in step with the dominant ideas prevalent in society. As such, if people are persuaded to share those religious beliefs, they come to hold an alternative view and therefore might be at the forefront of demanding social change.
What happens through religion?
Through religion, people learn the norms and values of society. This can be viewed as positively (functionalists) as ensuring a value consensus in maintained. Alternatively, it can be viewed negatively, as transmitting the values of a powerful group in society in order for them to maintain power and control.
What does religion need to be for it to act as a conservative force?
Religion must be powerful. Sociologists argue that in modern western democracies religion has largely lost that power. Marxists and feminists see it as a role that maintains the power of powerful groups and helps to subjugate those who are not powerful. They would argue that society remains stratified, that social differentiation is secured, through religion acting as in ideological weapon.
What was Webers focus of his study ‘The Protestant Ethic and the Spirit of Capitalism?
Focus of this study was that religion was an engine of social change. He identified features of the Calvinist Protestant religion which he argued had the unintended consequence of playing a major role in kick-starting capitalism.
What was Calvinism?
A Protestant religious movement from the 16th Century
What are the 2 features of Calvinism that Weber considered to be especially influential in the development of capitalism?
Ascetism
Predestination
What is Ascetism?
A philosophy of self-denial: the idea that Christians should lead an austere life, without luxuries.
What is predestination?
The idea that it has already been decided who will go to heaven and who will go to hell and there’s nothing you can do about this during your time on earth.
Good deeds, repentance etc won’t save you
What is the problem with the belief in predestination?
It fails to perform many functions that sociologists like Parsons or Malinowski suggested religion should perform, because it offers little comfort. It contributed to a sense of anxiety, sometimes described as salvation panic
What would Calvinists look for from god?
Would look for signs from God that they were among those who were going to heaven. They increasingly came to see success as a sign, and therefore threw themselves into their work.
How did Calvinism help capitalism?
Because of Ascetism and the idea that people should make themselves useful, it was business at which Calvinists might be successful, and when they were successful, instead of spending the money on luxury items, they reinvested the money into their businesses. Making money and reinvesting it in order to make money was the origin of the values and spirit of capitalism
Evaluation of Weber?
• even Weber himself acknowledged that Calvinism was not the only factor responsible for the development of capitalism. He believed it to be a significant factor, but acknowledged that there would have been others
• Weber has been accused of holding a ‘debate with the ghost of Marx’. While Marx saw capitalism as the product of material relationships and religion as something which reflected those material interests, Weber sought to turn it on its head, by suggesting that economic change could be driven by religious beliefs and values.
• Weber’s conclusions have received some criticism. Eisenstadt (1968) argues that capitalism did occur in places where there was no Calvinism.
• others have pointed out that there were places were Calvinism was very strong where there was very little development of capitalism and indeed hostility to commerce.
• some have questioned Weber’s understanding of Calvinism and other religions and therefore his explanation is incorrect on a theological level
Weber was an interactionist
Neo-Marxist views on religion and social change?
Religion had a dual character and could act as a conservative force but it was also possible for it to challenge the status quo and encourage social change
Which religion is an example of dual character?
Hinduism - kept the maintenance of the caste system (social classes) but also inspired huge social change in the Indian nationalist movement & particularly the principles of non-violence and self-renunciation
What did Bloch (1954) write about and argue?
Wrote about The Principle of Hope and argued that religion did offer people the idea of a better sort of society. Although he thought that religious faith was misplaced, he did see in it a hope for a better sort of society and a belief that people should be able to have dignity and live a good life
What did Gramsci write about?
Wrote about the way in which bourgeoisie maintained power in capitalist society’s. He argued that through culture, the bourgeoisie was able to maintain hegemony: a dominant set of ideas that come to be seen as common sense.
He agreed that religion played a part in that and contributed to the hegemonic control of the ruling class however didn’t think this was the only role religion could play. Religion could be useful for building a counter-hegemony, led by organic intellectuals & popularise ideas that ran counter to those of the ruling class and helping build rebellion and protest
Examples of religious leaders acting like Gramsci’s organic intellectuals and using ideas in religion to campaign for significant change?
• the role of Martin Luther king in the US civil right movement
• Liberation theology in Latin America
How did Otto Maduro view liberation theology?
As an example of how religious organisations could provide guidance to the working class and the oppressed as they struggle with the ruling class
Rather than being a conservative force, what did the Catholic Church locally perform?
Locally performed a revolutionary role in countries like El Salvador in the fight against their military dictatorships.
A key example is Oscar Romero, the Archbishop of San Salvador. Initially Romero was concerned about priests in his diocese working alongside the poor, helping them to organise groups and participating in political campaigns. However, he became increasingly angered by the oppressive nature in El Salvador and the brutal repression of the poor. As archbishop, Romero used his platform to speak out against the government, denouncing state killings. He also set up various schemes to assist the victims and their families