Behaviourist Approach Flashcards

You may prefer our related Brainscape-certified flashcards:
1
Q

1st assumption

A

Humans are born a blank slate
Nothing is inate
Nurture
Environmental determinism
Tabula rasa = blank slate
Born with basic responses: crying, pain and hunger

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
2
Q

2nd assumption

A

Behaviour is learned through conditioning
Classical = learned by association
Operant = learn by consequence

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
3
Q

Classical conditioning

A

Stage 1-
US - UR
NS - no response

Stage 2-
US + NS - UR

Stage 3-
CS - CR

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
4
Q

Operant conditioning

A

Positive reinforcement - reward that increases likelihood of action being repeated
Negative reinforcement - unpleasant experience removed after actions so more likely to repeat
Punishment - stimulus that weakens behaviour (unpleasant = avoid)

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
5
Q

3rd assumption

A

Humans and animals learn in similar ways
Pavlov and skinner
E.g
Classical conditioning - aversion therapy
Operant conditioning - token economy

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
6
Q

Aims of aversion therapy

A

Develop a strong dislike to something ‘aversion’ to a stimulus
Can treat:
Drug/alcohol abuse
Gambling
Smoking

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
7
Q

Main component of aversion therapy

A

Classical conditioning
Operant conditioning
Covert sensitation
New developments

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
8
Q

Classical conditioning- aversion therapy

A

E.g give alcoholic sickness drug (UCS-UCR)
Pair drugs with alcohol(UCS +NS - UCR)
Association will cause them to avoid alcohol (CS-CR)

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
9
Q

Covert sensitisation - aversion therapy

A

Encourages imagination
No physical unpleasant stimuli
E.g imagine becoming homeless when gambling

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
10
Q

Operant conditioning - aversion therapy

A

Once association is made (classical) the person tends to avoid it
E.g alcoholic avoid the pub
Negative reinforcement is now motivating them to avoid stimulus

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
11
Q

New developments - aversion therapy

A

Tryptophan metabolites - stops alcohol breaking down properly so it creates negative effects
However when alcohol is avoided it creates feelings of tranquility

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
12
Q

Apply assumption 1 to the therapy

A

Covert sensitisation- we can teach ourself associations as nothing is inate

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
13
Q

Apply assumption 2 to the therapy

A

Same principle but changes association and replaces pleasure with unpleasant state
- this should suppress desired behaviour

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
14
Q

Evaluation of therapy - research to support

A

S- strength
E- smith found alcoholics sober after 1 year of therapy
E- helpful for certain addictions
W- strength as its successful and can help others

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
15
Q

Evaluation of therapy - patient drop out

A

S- weakness
E-Bancroft found 50% did not complete the full programme
E- shows high drop out rates
W- can’t evaluate the effectiveness as the willing participants are trying to to change/want to

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
16
Q

Evaluation of therapy - treatment of homosexuality (ethics)

A

S- weakness
E- e.g men being shown imagine of ‘pin up’ males when on drugs or in unpleasant situations
E- carried out until 2006 in a way to stop homosexuality
W- weakness as it was highly unethical and caused life long emotional and physical harm to individuals

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
17
Q

Watson and Rayners methodology

A

Albert ‘little albert’
Controlled observation
He was well developed and emotionally stable

18
Q

What was Alberts conditioning schedule

A

Loud noise (us) - fear (ur)
Rat (Ns) - no response
Noise + rat (us+ns) - fear (ur)
Rat (cs) - fear (cr)

19
Q

Watson and Rayners initial procedure

A

Tested him at 9months with a rabbit, dog, monkey, mask and cotton wool
Showed no fear

20
Q

Observation 1 procedure

A

11 months 3 days
White rat presented then shown again with bar struck behind him

21
Q

Observation 2 procedure

A

11 months 10 days
Rat alone then blocks in between as distraction then repeated rat and loud bar

22
Q

Observation 3 procedure

A

11 months 15 days
Introduced new stimuli like fur, cotton wool, his hair, Santa mask - also the rabbit rat and building blocks in between

23
Q

Observation 4 procedure

A

Location changes to a well lit lecture room with mattress on the floor - 11 months 20 days
Repeat of the rat in new location with repeated exposure of rat and noise - also shown new stimuli like dog barking

24
Q

Observation 5 procedure

A

12 months 21 days
Shown most stimuli like rat, rabbit, mask but no joint stimuli

25
Q

Observation 1 findings

A

Fell forward and whimpered

26
Q

Observation 2 findings

A

Played happily with blocks but fell, cried and tried to crawl away

27
Q

Observation 3 findings

A

Rabbit and rat he fell and whimpered whereas other things he was less bothered (kicked with his feet)

28
Q

Observation 4 findings

A

Rat = bent over crying + lifted his hands
Dog = fell over when it barked

29
Q

Observation 5 findings

A

Rat he leaned back and covered his eyes and was scared/withdrew from all stimuli

30
Q

Incidental findings

A

When scared he sucked he’s thumb to remove his fears

31
Q

1st conclusion of classic research

A

Study shows conclusively that directly conditioned emotional responses do occur when there was previously no response

32
Q

2nd conclusion of classic research

A

Stimulus generalisation
E.g rat - rabbit, dog, fur, cotton wool, Santa mask etc

33
Q

3rd conclusion of classic research

A

The view is that the response (fear) will persist and modify personality throughout life

34
Q

Evaluation of research - protection from harm

A

S- weakness
E-didn’t remove fears, life long trauma
E- shouldn’t experience more stress than daily life = breached
W- weakness as its permanently damaged him

35
Q

Evaluation of research - alternative evidence

A

S- strength
E- research supporting
E- OH mower said operant conditioning maintains phobias and classical conditioning creates them
W- supports that behaviour can be conditioned

36
Q

Evaluation of research - informed consent

A

S- weakness
E- Albert is too young to give full informed consent
E- only his mum consented but not to the extent of research
W- weakness breaches ethical guidelines

37
Q

Evaluation of research - methodology

A

S- strength
E- highly controlled environment - base line tests at 9 months
E- recorded/filmed - impacts ecological validity as it was an empty dark room with 4 strangers
W- strength due to control of variables

38
Q

Evaluation - application

A

S- strength
E-can help people in real life situations
E-more valid if it can help wider population e.g aversion therapy for alcoholics
W-strength as it benefits wider society

39
Q

Evaluation- reductionism

A

S- weakness
E-reduces complex human behaviour to simple stimulus response
E- this is too basic explanation
W- weakness as it ignores other factors of explanation of behaviour

40
Q

Evaluation - deterministic

A

S- weakness
E-removes personal and moral responsibility for behaviour
E-as a result of us being born a ‘blank slate’
W- weakness as it generalises too much and takes away personal responsibility

41
Q

Evaluation- scientific

A

S- strength
E-uses a scientific method
E- adds credibility and support to the key concepts
W- strength as it is a trusted result and can be published

42
Q

Debate - should we use conditioning on children

A

ON PAPER FLASHCARDS - IN FOLDER