Behaviourist Approach Flashcards

The assumptions, therapy, classical research and contemporary debate of the behaviourist approach.

You may prefer our related Brainscape-certified flashcards:
1
Q

What are the three assumptions of the behaviourist approach?

A

-Humans are born as a blank slate
-Behaviour is learned through conditioning
-Humans and animals learn in similar ways

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
2
Q

Explain the ‘humans are born as a blank slate’ assumption.

A

Behaviourists believe that we are born as a ‘tabula rasa’, aka a blank slate. This means that we are born only with our instincts (e.g. crying when hungry) and that any aspects of our personality are moulded by our environment.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
3
Q

What evidence is there to support the ‘blank slate’ assumption?

A

Bandura (1961) tested 36 boys and 36 girls aged 3-6. 24 boys and girls watched a role model play quietly with the Bobo Doll, while another 24 boys and girls watched a role model play aggressively with the Bobo Doll. The children who watched the aggressive role model played far more aggressively with the Bobo Doll compared to those with a calm role model.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
4
Q

Explain the ‘behaviour is learned through conditioning’ assumption.

A

There are two types of conditioning: classical and operant. Classical conditioning is when you change an unconditioned stimulus to a conditioned stimulus by pairing it with a neutral stimulus. Operant conditioning is where behaviour is learned through positive reinforcement, negative reinforcement or a punishment.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
5
Q

Define the following:
-Positive reinforcement
-Negative reinforcement
-Punishment

A

-Positive reinforcement: rewarding a behaviour to encourage the desirable behaviour happening again.
-Negative reinforcement: encouraging a desirable behaviour by removing a negative stimulus/avoiding consequences.
-Punishment: a consequence to reduce the likelihood of a undesirable behaviour.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
6
Q

Give an example of classical conditioning.

A

Pavlov’s Dog. Pavlov conditioned a dog to salivate at the sound of a bell ringing. He noticed that a dog would salivate whenever it was presented with food, so whenever he gave the dog food, he rang a bell. This caused the dog to salivate whenever a bell was rung, as it associated the sound of the bell with food.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
7
Q

Give an example of operant conditioning (hint - there’s two!)

A

Skinner’s Rats.

Positive reinforcement - Skinner placed a hungry rat in the Skinner box with a lever in the corner. Whenever the rat would nudge the lever, a food pellet would come out. The rat learned to nudge the lever whenever it wanted food.

Negative reinforcement - Skinner placed a rat in a Skinner box that had an electrical current running through the floor. Whenever the rat nudged the lever, the current stopped. The rat learned to nudge the lever to stop the current (negative reinforcement).

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
8
Q

Explain the ‘humans and animals learn in similar ways’ assumption.

A

Behaviourists believe that the ways human and animals learn behaviours is the same. Therefore, we are able to study animals in a laboratory environment and make generalisations about human behaviour based on the findings.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
9
Q

What evidence is there to support the ‘humans and animals learn in similar ways’ assumption?

A

Watson and Rayner (1920) Little Albert study, Pavlov’s dogs, Skinner’s rats.

Real life application: token economy systems in prisons (desirable behaviours are reinforced with tokens that can be exchanged for rewards, e.g. sweets or cigarettes).

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
10
Q

What is the therapy of the behaviourist approach?

A

Systematic desensitisation.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
11
Q

What are the main components of SD?

A

1) Providing the patient with coping techniques to relax, e.g. progressive muscle relaxation (PMR) or imagery.
2) Constructing an anxiety hierarchy.
3) Counterconditioning: Exposure to phobic stimuli.
4) Continue to progress through the anxiety hierarchy.

Treatment has been successful when patient can remain calm during situation ranked highest on the anxiety hierarchy.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
12
Q

Define these key terms of SD:
-Extinction
-Reciprocal inhibition
-In vivo
-In vitro

A

-Extinction: the gradual weakening of a conditioned response that results in the behaviour decreasing or disappearing.

-Reciprocal inhibition: two opposing emotions cannot be felt at the same time.

-In vivo: the client is actually exposed to the phobic stimulus.

-In vitro: the client imagines exposure to the phobic stimulus.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
13
Q

How do the assumptions of the behaviourist approach apply to SD?

A

-Blank slate: we aren’t born with phobias, they are caused by our experiences in our environment. Our environment can be manipulated to unlearn the response to the phobic stimulus. SD allows us to learn a new response to the stimulus.

-Behaviour learned through conditioning: Behaviours are learned through environment, therefore phobias are learnt via conditioning. Phobias are developed through classical conditioning and maintained through operant conditioning. We can unlearn conditioned responses through SD.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
14
Q

What points can we use to evaluate SD?

A

+ve Supporting evidence:
Rothbaum et al (2000) used virtual reality (vitro) to help those who were afraid of flying. Following SD treatment, 93% of pps agreed to take a test flight. Anxiety levels were lower than those of the control group who had not received SD and this improvement was maintained.

-ve Doesn’t treat the cause of the phobia, just provides coping mechanisms:
McGrath (2000) used SD for a 9-year-old girl who had a noise phobia. A fear thermometer was used (rating scale 1-10). The girl’s fear rating dropped from 7 to 3 for balloons popping, from 9 to 3 for party poppers and from 8 to 5 for cap guns.
Shows that it is effective, but only reduces anxiety levels, not a treatment.

+ve More ethical than other treatments:
More suitable for children, as children have less life experience and therefore their behaviour is easier to manipulate. They may struggle to take medicines or stick to a drug therapy, and certain medications cause side effects.

+ve Client led
Client led, meaning treatment and ascension up the hierarchy is at the client’s pace. Amount of anxiety experienced is no more than they would encounter in real life. Much less harm to client compared to flooding.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
15
Q

What is the classical research for the behaviourist approach?

A

Watson and Rayner (1920) Little Albert study.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
16
Q

What is the methodology of Watson & Rayner?

A

A controlled observation.

17
Q

What was the initial step in the procedures of Watson & Rayner?

A

Emotional tests: Albert was 9 months old when taken to the ‘lab’ for the first time. He was exposed to several stimuli: white rat, rabbit, dog, monkey, masks, cotton wool, etc. He showed no fear response to the stimuli. A metal bar was struck with a hammer behind his head. He started violently, but didn’t cry.

18
Q

What happened in session 1 of Watson and Rayner’s observation?

A

Albert was 11 months old and brought into the ‘lab’ again. A white rat was presented to him and he began to reach for it. As he reached for it, the metal bar was struck behind his head. He jumped and fell forward, but didn’t cry. The second time, he fell forward and whimpered.

19
Q

What happened in session 2 of W&R’s observation?

A

A week after session 1. Albert didn’t reach for the rat this time, only stared at it. When rat was placed nearer, he reached out but withdrew his hand when the rat touched him. He was then presented with toy blocks, which he played with happily. He was then presented with the rat again, but this time paired with the loud noise. Repeated 5 times, each time he got more distressed.

20
Q

What happened in session 3 of W&R’s observation?

A

5 days after session 2. Presented with blocks, which he played happily with. When presented with rat, he immediately showed signs of fear (conditioned response retained). Presented with rabbit, and immediately burst into tears and crawled away (associated with rat). Presented with cotton wool, cautious but played with it.

21
Q

What happened in session 4 of W&R’s observation?

A

5 days after session 3. Presented with joint stimulation (rat + loud noise). Then taken to new environment, a large well-lit lecture room. Responses to the rabbit, rat and dog were less extreme than before. After exposure to joint stimulation again, his fear response to stimuli was much more extreme. Still played happily with blocks (fear only associated with fluffy objects).

22
Q

What happened in session 5 of W&R’s observation?

A

1 month after session 4. Presented with Santa Claus mask, rabbit, dog, fur coat, rat and blocks. Reaction to furry objects was less extreme (lessened over time), but he clearly avoided them, whimpered and sometimes even cried.

23
Q

What are the conclusions of W&R’s observation?

A

Demonstrated that a fear response can be easily created. Also demonstrates that conditioned phobias can be generalised to similar stimuli. W&R suggested that it is probable that many phobias are acquired in this way.

24
Q

What is the contemporary debate of the behaviourist approach?

A

Using conditioning techniques to control the behaviour of children.

25
Q

What are the three main topics used in the contemporary debate?

A

-Conditioning at home
-Conditioning in schools
-Vulnerable children

26
Q

What evidence is used for/against conditioning at home?

A

For:
Gill (1998) found that paying children to complete household tasks resulted in them performing 20% of all household chores.
-Does this benefit the children or the adults?

Against:
Morris (2014) the ‘naughty step’ (Supernanny) can have long-term emotional effects on a child.
-Children unable to remove themselves from situation (psychological harm)

27
Q

What evidence is used for/against conditioning in schools?

A

For:
McAllister (1969) increased ‘teacher praise’ led to a decrease in ‘inappropriate talking’ in secondary school.
Leuitt (2010) if positive reinforcement in schools increases grades, this will benefit society & economy
-Conditioned without knowledge and consent

Against:
Lepper (1973) when nursery children were promised a reward, they spent less time on a task, suggesting they were motivated by the reward rather than intrinsic motivation
-Removing the natural drive to succeed.

Dweck (1975) found that children who were praised for doing well on a maths test did worse on a later more difficult test than children who had been told they were lazy.
-Positive reinforcement isn’t always effective
-Negative reinforcement causes psychological harm

28
Q

What evidence is used for/against vulnerable children?

A

For:
Lovaas (1978) developed ‘applied behaviour analysis’ (ABA) to increase the frequency and quality of social interactions for children with autism. ABA is a therapy that targets specific behaviours (e.g. language abilities).

Against:
There are many methodological flaws with Lovaas’ research, including not randomly allocation children to be in the control or experimental group. This means that any conclusions drawn from the research may not be valid. The treatment is very costly. Lovaas states that approximately 40 hours a week of treatment is needed, while Anderson et al (1987) found that an average of 20 hours a week of treatment was enough for significant improvements.