BB Lecture 12-13: Pharmacodynamics I and II Flashcards

1
Q

What is the difference between pharmacodynamics and pharmacokinetics?

A

what the drug does to the body
vs
what the body does to the drug

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
2
Q

What kinds of plots are used for analyzing drug effects in pharmacology?

A

semilog transformation

effect (or fraction of receptor bound by drug) against log dose or concentration

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
3
Q

What are agonists?

A

produce a response by changing the rate of a biological process from its basal rate (most always increasing it above basal activity- inverse agonists do the opposite)

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
4
Q

What is a direct agonist?

A

a drug that binds to and directly activates a receptor

its binding to the receptor evokes the response

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
5
Q

What is an indirect agonist?

A

drug that increases the level of an endogenous agonist

has no effect if endogenous agonist is not present

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
6
Q

What is a full agonist?

A

can stimulate a signaling pathway to the maximum extent possible in that tissue

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
7
Q

What is intrinsic efficacy?

A

the effect produced by the drug binding to a single receptor

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
8
Q

How can you tell the intrinsic efficacy of an agonist?

A

if there are spare receptors for a drug, the response curve lies to the L of the binding curve
the fewer spare receptors an agonist has, the lower the intrinsic efficacy

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
9
Q

How is affinity related to the dissociation constant (kd) for a drug-receptor interaction?

A

drugs with small dissociation constants have high affinity for the receptor
high affinity means less [drug] is needed to occupy the same number of receptors

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
10
Q

What does the potency of a full agonist tell you?

A

the potency is inversely related to the concentration needed to produce a response
the lower the required concentration, the higher the potency

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
11
Q

What factors determine the potency of a full agonist?

A

affinity
intrinsic efficacy
the most potent full agonists have high affinity and high intrinsic efficacy

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
12
Q

What is a partial agonist?

A

an agonist that is incapable of producing the full response of a system (even when its concentration is sufficient to bind all of the receptors)
has low intrinsic efficacy

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
13
Q

What do the binding curves and the concentration response curves look like for partial agonists?

A

they are superimposed

because every additional receptor that is bound by a drug leads to a larger response

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
14
Q

What are inverse agonists?

A

produce a response in the opposite direction to that of a full or partial agonist

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
15
Q

Describe the equilibrium between active and inactive conformations for the different kinds of agonists.

A

full agonist: I<a>A</a>

inverse agonist= I only</a>

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
16
Q

How do you calculate the number of receptors bound to a drug?

A
B= ( Bmax x [D] ) / ( KD + [D] )
where:
Bmax= total # of receptors
KD= dissociation constant for the drug
[D] = concentration of the drug
17
Q

How do you calculate the effect of a drug if you can assume it is linearly related to binding?

A

E = ( Emax x [D] ) / ( EC50 + [D] )
where:
Emax = drug’s max effect (response)

18
Q

What are antagonists?

A

bind receptors and do not change activity but prevent an agonist from producing a response

19
Q

What are competitive antagonists?

A

antagonists that compete with agonists for a binding site

20
Q

What are non-competitive antagonists?

A

antagonists that bind somewhere other than the location an agonist binds (may even be a different protein) and blocks response to the agonist

21
Q

What are irreversible antagonists?

A

covalently modify the receptor, rendering it permanently inactive

22
Q

How does a reversible competitive agonist impact a concentration-response curve?

A

shifts the curve for the agonist to the R

can be overcome by increasing agonist concentration (surmountable)

23
Q

How can you calculate the response of an agonist to a competitive reversible antagonist?

A

E= (Emax x [D] ) / { EC50 (1 + [A]/Ka) + [D] }

24
Q

How can you calculate the amount of agonist bound to a receptor in the presence of a competitive reversible antagonist?

A

B = ( Bmax x [D] ) / { Kd ( 1 + [A]/Ka ) + [D] }

where:
[A] is the concentration of the antagonist
Ka is the dissociation constant of the antagonist

25
Q

What is the pA2?

A

parameter that is used to compare the abilities of different competitive antagonists to inhibit agonist-induced responses
specific for a drug to a specific receptor (can change for the same drug interacting with a different receptor)

26
Q

How do you calculate pA2?

A

pA2= -log(Ka)

27
Q

What does a high pA2 indicate?

A

a relatively low concentration of antagonist is sufficient to effectively block the response to an agonist

28
Q

What is the potency of an antagonist?

A

antagonists have NO potency because they have no intrinsic activity
if you hear they have “low potency” they mean they have a low pA2 (and the opposite for “high potency”)

29
Q

What are irreversible and noncompetitive (allosteric) antagonists?

A

produce a non-surmountable effect (increasing the maximal effect of an agonist does not restore its maximal response)

30
Q

What impacts the extent of the inhibition by an irreversible antagonist?

A
  1. duration of treatment

2. concentration

31
Q

How does an irreversible/noncompetitive antagonist effect a full agonist’s concentration-response curve?

A

the curve becomes increasingly flatter (shorter) as the concentration of antagonist increases
this can be blunted if the intrinsic efficacy of the agonist is higher (allows for more spare receptors)

32
Q

How does an irreversible/noncompetitive antagonist effect a partial agonist’s concentration curve?

A

by definition partial agonists do not allow for spare receptors, so the curve will be dramatically flattened from the beginning as any of the available receptors will be lost