Battery Flashcards

1
Q

What is battery under common law?

A

Battery is defined as the intentional or reckless application of unlawful force.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
2
Q

What is the Actus Reus of battery?

A

The Actus Reus is the application of unlawful force, which must not be consented to.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
3
Q

Is injury required for battery?

A

No injury is needed for battery to occur.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
4
Q

What constitutes unlawful force?

A

Unlawful force must be more than ‘everyday contact’.

Examples include Collins v Wilcock and Wood (Fraser v DPP).

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
5
Q

Can force be lawful?

A

Yes, force can be lawful in cases of consent and self-defence.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
6
Q

Is direct physical contact necessary for battery?

A

Direct physical contact is not needed for battery.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
7
Q

Can contact with clothing be considered battery?

A

Yes, contact with clothing is sufficient for battery.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
8
Q

Can battery occur through an omission?

A

Yes, battery can occur through an omission.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
9
Q

Provide an example of unlawful force in battery.

A

An example is when D pushed V in the street, which is more than everyday contact.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
10
Q

What is an example of battery involving unwanted contact?

A

Kissing V against her wishes is an example of battery.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
11
Q

What is the men’s rea

A

The intention or recklessness as to the application of unlawful force (Mohan)

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
12
Q

What is the transferred malice principle

A

Where a crime intended for one person falls on another by accident (Latimer and Mitchell)

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
13
Q

What does the joint enterprise and transferred malice principle state

A

It does not matter that D was not the actual one who injured V,all that matters is that D meant to injure X and in fighting back with D,Vwas injured

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
14
Q

What does the transferred malice principle state?

A

Only similar crimes can be transferred .

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
15
Q

What does the coincidence rule state?

A

The actual reus and mens rea rmust coincide at least once(Fagan v MPC)(Thabo v Meli)

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly