Automatism Flashcards

1
Q

What is automatism?

A

Automatism is a full defence in law where there is an involuntary action, a mental capacity defence.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
2
Q

Who bears the burden of proof for automatism?

A

The burden of proving automatism is on the defence, who must prove it on the balance of probabilities.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
3
Q

How was automatism defined in Bratty v A-G for Northern Ireland?

A

Automatism is defined as ‘an act done by the muscles without any control by the mind, such as a spasm, a reflex action or a convulsion… not conscious of what he is doing… suffering from concussion.’

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
4
Q

What did AG’s Ref No 2 of 1992 clarify about automatism?

A

D must have lost the ability to control their actions rather than having impaired control.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
5
Q

What is required for non-insane automatism?

A

Non-insane automatism requires an external cause.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
6
Q

What are some examples of external causes of automatism?

A

Examples include sneezing, hypnotism, a blow to the head, attack by a swarm of bees, and post-traumatic stress disorder (Rv T).

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
7
Q

How does diabetes relate to automatism?

A

Being diabetic but not eating properly is an external cause and is considered automatism, not insanity, as in Quick.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
8
Q

What is self-induced automatism?

A

Self-induced automatism occurs when the defendant’s conduct brings on an automatic state.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
9
Q

How does self-induced automatism apply to specific intent offences?

A

For specific intent offences, such as murder and theft, self-induced automatism can be a defence even if the defendant knows of the risk of bringing on an automatic state.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
10
Q

How does self-induced automatism apply to basic intent offences?

A

For basic intent offences, self-induced automatism cannot be a defence if the defendant knows of the risk, as this is considered recklessness.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
11
Q

What is the outcome for a defendant who is found to be in a self-induced automatic state and knew the risk?

A

The defendant cannot use automatism as a defence if they knew the risk, as illustrated in the case of Coley.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
12
Q

What is the conclusion regarding automatism as a defence?

A

D will be found not guilty due to automatism, which is a full defence.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly