Bandura Flashcards

You may prefer our related Brainscape-certified flashcards:
1
Q

What was the aim of Bandura et al. (1961)?

A

To investigate whether children would learn aggression by observing a model and reproduce this behavior in the absence of the model, and whether the sex of the role model influenced learning and reproducing aggression.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
2
Q

What type of experiment was Bandura et al. (1961)?

A

A lab experiment using an independent measures design.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
3
Q

What were the 4 hypotheses in Bandura’s study?

A

Observed aggressive behavior will be imitated, so children seeing aggressive models will be more aggresBoys are more likely to imitate aggression than girls.
sive than those seeing a non-aggressive model or no model.

Observed non-aggressive behavior will be imitated, so children seeing non-aggressive models will be less aggressive than those seeing no model.

Children are more likely to copy a same-sex model.

Boys are more likely to imitate aggression than girls.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
4
Q

What was the sample size and composition in Bandura’s study?

A

72 children (36 boys, 36 girls) aged 3–6 years from Stanford University Nursery School.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
5
Q

How were children’s aggression levels pre-tested?

A

They were rated on four 5-point scales by the experimenter and a teacher, measuring physical aggression, verbal aggression, aggression toward inanimate objects, and aggression inhibition.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
6
Q

What was done to annoy the children deliberately?

A

Children were shown attractive toys but were told after 2 minutes that these toys were reserved for other children.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
7
Q

What were the 3 independent variables in Bandura’s study?

A

Model type (aggressive, non-aggressive, or no model).

Model gender (same gender or different gender as the child).

Learner gender (boy or girl).

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
8
Q

What was the dependent variable in the study?

A

The child’s learning, measured through observed aggressive behavior during a controlled 20-minute observation period.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
9
Q

What did the aggressive model do?

A

The model attacked the Bobo doll using physical actions (e.g., punching, kicking, hitting with a mallet) and verbal comments (e.g., “Kick him,” “Sock him in the nose”).

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
10
Q

What did the non-aggressive model do?

A

The model assembled Tinkertoys for 10 minutes without interacting aggressively.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
11
Q

How was behavior observed and recorded?

A

Through time sampling in 5-second intervals, totalling 240 response units per child.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
12
Q

What did the study find about aggressive behavior?

A

Children exposed to aggressive models imitated both physical and verbal aggression significantly more than those in the control or non-aggressive model groups.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
13
Q

How did gender influence imitation?

A

Boys were more likely to imitate physical aggression than girls.

Girls imitated verbal aggression slightly more than boys.

Boys and girls were more likely to imitate same-sex models.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
14
Q

How did children react to aggressive female models?

A

Comments tended to disapprove of female aggression (e.g., “That’s not the way for a lady to behave”).

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
15
Q

What were some strengths of Bandura et al.’s study?

A

High control of extraneous variables (lab setting).

Matched participants design ensured comparable aggression levels across groups.

Use of both quantitative and qualitative data.

High inter-rater reliability (r = 0.9).

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
16
Q

What were some weaknesses of Bandura et al.’s study?

A

Limited generalizability (small sample size from one nursery).

Possible harm to children from exposure to aggression.

No follow-up to assess long-term effects.

Some qualitative data was subjective.

17
Q

What did Bandura conclude about observational learning?

A

Observational learning and imitation can account for the acquisition of specific behaviors without reinforcement.

18
Q

Were all 4 hypotheses supported?

A

Yes, all 4 hypotheses were supported.

19
Q

What is imitative learning?

A

Learning new behaviors by observing and copying others’ actions.

20
Q

How does gender-role reinforcement relate to aggression?

A

Boys are encouraged for aggressive or “strength” behaviors, while girls are often discouraged from aggression, affecting their imitation readiness.

21
Q

What might Bandura’s findings suggest about nature vs. nurture?

A

Both play roles: Nature influences aggression readiness (e.g., boys showing more physical aggression), while nurture shapes behavior through role models and reinforcement of gender-appropriate actions.

22
Q

How does Bandura’s study contribute to the situational vs. individual debate?

A

A: Situational Factors

The study supports the idea that behavior can be influenced by the situation, as children exposed to aggressive models imitated their behavior regardless of their individual traits.
Observing a role model’s actions in a controlled environment led to learned aggression, showing the power of the environment in shaping behavior.
A: Individual Factors

Individual differences were also evident. For instance:
Gender differences: Boys imitated more physical aggression, while girls imitated verbal aggression more.
Same-sex model influence: Children were more likely to imitate behavior from a model of the same gender.