Bad Science Flashcards
Name 5 examples of why bad science matters
> Health > Legal Matters > Ethical > Financial > Progress
Give an example of Health
Newspaper headlines led to parents NOT vaccinating their children against measles, mumps and rubella
Give an example of Legal Matters
Paul Ingram case
Explain Paul Ingram case
Was a policeman in DC, accused by his daughters of molesting them as children. During investigation he “recovered” memories of abuse and satanic rituals.
He served a prison sentence, but eventually tried to retract his confession, as he believed that his “recovered” memories were false.
The case was all based on the notion that Ingram repressed his memories and then recovered them.
Give an example of Ethical
Employing frauds, selecting people based on “personality tests” which had no factual support.
Give an example of Financial
Diverting funds to ineffective treatments
Give an example of Progress
Advance in modern science slowed by “bogus” theories which have no true empirical backing
Define Science
Science is the idea that knowledge of the external world can come only from objective investigation.
Define Pseudoscience
Nonscience masquerading as genuine science… it possesses the same trappings around science, but does usually is based on false evidence, or no evidence at all
Describe scientific methods
We can discover the causes of events through systematic observation/empirical observation. Empirical means that experience, not faith, is the source of knowledge.
Discus correlation vs. causation
To support the idea that x causes y, requires a controlled empirical experimentation. Just because 2 variables correlate does NOT mean that one causes another. There may be a third variable (or many other variables) which may explain the relation.
An example of correlation vs. causation
Breakfast and school performance
What makes a good theory?
> Testability
Falsifiable
Simplicity
Discuss Testability
A theory must be open to experimentation and must be falsifiable e.g. many people claim to be psychic refuse to be tested in labs, as they claim the “presence of a skeptic” disrupts their abilities. Thus their claims fail the condition of testability.
What makes a good questionnaire?
> Reliability (same score on two separate occasions)
>Validity