B8 Work related violence Flashcards

You may prefer our related Brainscape-certified flashcards:
1
Q

definition of work related violence

A

any incident in which a person is abused, threatened or assaulted in circumstances relating to their work

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
2
Q

scope or work related violence

A

physical violence (kick, spit, hit, push)
verbal abuse
non-verbal abuse (e.g. stalking)
other threatening behaviour

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
3
Q

effects of work related violence - employee

A

pain, distress, disability, death
psychological / emotional
stress / anxiety / depression

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
4
Q

effects of work related violence - employer

A
poor morale
poor organisation reputation
staff retention problems
staff recruitment problems
absenteeism
higher insurance costs
compensation payments
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
5
Q

stats 2015/16 - Crime Survey for England & Wales / HSE / Labour Force Survey

A
1.4% of working adults are victims
350000 experienced work related violence
698000 incidents
329000 assaults, 369000 threats
46% where strangers were the offenders
4697 RIDDORs = physical violence
41000 injuries (Labour Force Survey)
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
6
Q

industries susceptible to work related violence

A
health care
residential care
public admin / defence
education
social work
retail
food & drink
work with psychiatric
work with D&A impaired
lone workers
young workers / trainees - less experience of how to deal with situations
night / shift workers - more violent incidents at night
home visitors - anxious / worried may become violent
handling money / valuables
inspection / enforcement roles
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
7
Q

sources of info ref work related violence

A
staff surveys
informal discussions
staff questionnaire
incident reporting
trade unions
trade associations
press articles
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
8
Q

data items to collect ref work relate violence

A
what happened
details of assailant
outcome eg staff absence
location
potential severity
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
9
Q

assessment of work related violence

A
identify who is at risk
identify patterns from data, common causes
identify suitable control measures
evaluate risks
record results
review
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
10
Q

legal requirements to manage work related violence

A

HSWA section 2 esp where employer is aware of the risk of violence

MHSWR 1999 - risk assessment & principles of prevention

RIDDOR 2013 - violence resulting in over 7 day absence

Equality Act 2010 - protect those with protected characteristic from harassment (age, disability, gender reassignment, marriage / civil partnership, pregnancy / maternity, race, religion, sex, sexual orientation

Public Order Act 1986 - enforced by police, covers physical abuse, threats, abuse

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
11
Q

employers common law duty ref work related violence

A

duty to protect staff from violent attack from the public
injury = sue for negligence
leave because risk unacceptable = employment tribuna

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
12
Q

O’Toole v First Quench 2005

A

First case = Collins v First Quench 2003 (Scottish case)
Won damages as judge ruled that risk of robbery would have been reduced with 2nd staff member present

O’Toole v First Quench 2005 (English case)
Court held it was unreasonable to double staff number to deter robbery

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
13
Q

Mitchell & Others v United Co-op Ltd 2012

A

PTSD of ladies that worked in Co-op store near Manchester following robbery.

RA showed high risk of robbery - 2 x robberies before shop owned by Co-op. 10 robberies following ownership after security screens removed.

Other controls implemented, eg panic alarms, CTV, holding limited cash, staff training

Ruling - Co-op had taken reasonable steps, direct link between robberies and removal of screens could not be made. Screens would not have prevented psychiatric injury. Cost of full time security prohibitive.

Case dismissed

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
14
Q

legal aspects ref reasonable force

A

entitled to protect yourself if in fear of their life or safety of another person

must not use more force than necessary / reasonable

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
15
Q

physical control measures

A
cash free systems
pay staff via bank transfer
better layouts - seating, decor, lighting
info ref waiting times in waiting rooms
remove items that could be used as weapons
CCTV
alarm systems
security doors
wider counters - greater than arms length
protective screens
barriers
security patrols
panic buttons / personal alarms
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
16
Q

organisational control measures

A
safe parking
arrange transport home
communicate info ref known client risks
allocate suitable staff to task (not women or young)
record staff whereabouts
call in systems
regular phone / radio contact
lone worker warning systems
GPS systems
17
Q

behavioural control measures

A

staff training
staff guidance on dealing with incidents
post incident support

18
Q

staff training content

A

inc managers so they can recognise problems associated with violence

recognise / understand workplace violence
how to assess danger and take precautions
interpersonal skills to defuse situation / body language
incident reporting, investigation, counselling, follow-up

19
Q

post incident activities

A

debrief to talk through incident
time off to recover
counselling, Employee Assistance Programme
legal help