B - IBC Flood

Question 1

IBC FLOOD

3 reasons why overland flooding has historically not been available in Canada
(ie)
3 specific reasons for non-coverage of overland flooding

Answer 1

1) adverse selection, (would be too expensive if offered)
2) gov’t under-invests in risk planning and mitigation
3) lacks of effective flood hazard maps

Question 2

IBC FLOOD

4 pre-conditions essential to establish a strong flood risk management culture

Answer 2

1) UP-TO-DATE FLOOD HAZARD MAPS for planning and risk mgmt
2) INVEST IN INFRASTRUCTURE (sewers, levies)
3) POLICYHOLDERS AWARENESS OF RISK, mitigation methods, and financial management of floods
4) LIMIT USE OF TAXES to compensate after disaster (individuals should have risk-mitigation incentives and taxpayers should have minimized burden)

Question 3

IBC FLOOD

4 trends making the financial management of flood risk increasingly problematic

Answer 3

1) growth in population and asset values
2) concentration of urban development in flood-prone areas
3) increase in violent weather patterns
4) increase in vulnerability of infrastructures due to under-investment in risk mitigation.

Question 4

IBC FLOOD

Arithmetic example showing why flood insurance premium is expensive

Explain.

Answer 4

Property Value = 500K
1-in-50 year flood frequency = 2%
avg severity = 25% of property value = 125K
——-
avg LC = 2% * 125K = 2500$
——-
Owner would have to pay 2500$ at a minimum (not including expenses or profit) for the base flood coverage
——-
When flood occurs, all properties are affected at the same time, reducing the diversification benefit that could have led to reduction in premium

Question 5

IBC FLOOD

GERMANY Flood Insurance program

Answer 5

1) Private
2) Voluntary purchase
3) Optional end’t
4) Take-up rate of 30%
5) Risk-Based Pricing
6) Financial impact to policyholders
7) Gov’t action to forbid floodplain development in risk zones and to create flood maps

Question 6

IBC FLOOD

ITALY Flood Insurance Program

Answer 6

1) Private
2) Voluntary purchase
3) Optional end’t bundled w EQ coverage
4) Low insurance take-up (LT 35%) due to belief that its govt responsibility to compensate losses due to natural disaster. Flood take up rate even lower, LT 10%
5) Risk-based pricing
6) Financial impact to taxpayers

Question 7

IBC FLOOD

RUSSIA Flood Insurance Program

Answer 7

1) Private
2) Voluntary purchase
3) Optional end’t
4) Take-up rate LT 5%
5) Risk-based Pricing

Question 8

IBC FLOOD

JAPAN Flood Insurance Program

Answer 8

1) Private
2) Voluntary
3) As part of home policy (with co-insurance of around 30%).
4) 40% take-up rate
5) Risk-based pricing
6) Financial impact to policyholders
7) Gov’t invested largely in risk mitigation measures to bring flood risk under control.

Question 9

IBC FLOOD

UK Flood Insurance Program

Answer 9

1) Private
2) Voluntary, but virtually mandatory
3) As part of Home Policy
4) 95% take-up rate
5) Risk-based Pricing
6) Financial impact to policyholder

7) Both individuals and gov’t have clear role to play
- Gov’t : flood mapping, infrastructure, and zoning
- Consumers: Risk-Based Premium and risk mitigation measures to maintain insurability

Question 10

IBC FLOOD

2 reasons why UK flood insurance program is unsustainable and need review.

Answer 10

1) existing insurers were required to retain high-risk properties while not required for new entrants.
2) govt under invested in mitigation

Question 11

IBC FLOOD

Discuss Insurers and Govt NEW AGREEMENT about Flood Risk Insurance in UK

Answer 11

1) Creation of FLOOD RE
2) RSP financed by insurers as a non-for-profit fund to subsidize high-risk properties
3) Levy charged to all other policyholders
4) Always operates at a loss:

• to ensure availability/affordability to high-risk properties
• to help the transition to risk-based pricing

5) Gov’t roles are:
- setting price ceiling for flood coverage
- responsible for extraordinary cat losses
- investing in new flood defences

Question 12

IBC FLOOD

US Flood Insurance Program

Answer 12

1) Public
2) Voluntary
3) Optional End’t. Homeowners can buy coverage only if living in SFHA (Special Flood Hazard Areas)
4) 20-30% take-up rate
5) Gov’t set pricing (based on Flood Insurance Rate Maps (FIRMs))
6) Financial impact to taxpayers
7) Federal program - NFIP (National Flood Insurance Program). NFIP system cannot be financially sound by design.

Question 13

IBC FLOOD

FRANCE Flood Insurance Program

Answer 13

1) Public
2) Mandatory
3) Bundle with other CATs (CAT NAT)
4) 100% take-up rate
5) Gov’t set pricing (uniform rate across country)
6) Financial impact on taxpayers
7) Both national and local gov’t must declare state of emergency for a claim to be eligible to CAT NAT

Question 14

IBC FLOOD

3 Main disadvantages of the FRANCE Flood insurance Program

Answer 14

Premium NOT RISK-BASED, removing incentive for risk mitigation from individuals and local govt

low-risk consumers SUBSIDIZE those at higher risk

More a WELFARE program than an insurance program

Question 15

IBC FLOOD

Main reason for failure of many of the international flood models

Answer 15

ADVERSE SELECTION

risk-based premium not affordable since only high-risk wants to purchase it.

Question 16

IBC FLOOD

Advantage and disadvantage of bundling flood risks with other perils

Answer 16

A : Adverse selection is greatly reduced

D : forces low-risk consumers to subsidize high-risk ones

Question 17

IBC FLOOD

3 roles of government for Flood Insurance

Answer 17

1) invest in infrastructure, zoning, floodplain development regulation, up-to-date flood maps for land-use planning
2) increase public education
3) address the issue of high-risk properties

Question 18

IBC FLOOD

4 examples of gov’t under-investment in risk planning

Answer 18

BUILDING codes (obsolete)
ASSETS mgmt (poor)
INFRASTRUCTURE (lack of)
LAND-USE PLANNING (inadequate)