A - Marshall Flashcards
MARSHALL
2 component benefits of Ontario’s mandatory auto insurance system
- No fault (AB)
- Provide benefits regardless of fault
- Tort (BI)
- Allows you to sue the at-fault driver
MARSHALL
For ON auto insurance, benefits are fair but are not delivered fairly.
4 CAUSES of unfair delivery of auto insurance benefits in Ontario.
- COST CONTROL AT THE EXPENSE OF CARE
- Insurers emphasize cost control instead of care
- But then victims do not recover and final costs are higher not lower
- LAWYERS
- Lawyers’ contingency fees are a percent of the settlement
- So lawyers seek higher settlements, not better care for victims
- ENTITLEMENTS
- Victims seek to maximize entitlements versus addressing own care needs
- VOLUME
- Providers are paid on volume of treatment not results
MARSHALL
5 actions items in Ontario’s five-part ACTION PLAN for addressing the unfair delivery of benefits.
- STRUCTURAL FLAWS
- Fix structural flaws by appointing an arms-length regulator with powers to enact policies and procedures
- CAT INJURIES
- Change compensation system for cat injuries because lawyers are taking too big of a chunk
- CARE NOT CASH APPROACH
- Focus on timely, appropriate medical care, not cash payouts
- LAWYERS
- Make contingency fees transparent (and simplify benefits so there is less need to hire lawyers)
- SMART REGULATION
- Allow insurers more regulatory freedom to compete on price and service
MARSHALL
What is the opportunity gap in Ontario Auto Insurance?
What is the value gap in ON Auto Insurance?
- Opportunity for ON Auto Premium much higher than canadian avg. Could be much lower without impacting quality
- The VALUE of medical care could be better if there were more focus on active medical management
MARSHALL
Similarities and differences in BC and ON auto products.
- Similarities
- Both are mandatory
- Both include tort & no-fault benefits
- Differences
- BC
- Public
- Emphasizes the tort system (litigation)
- ON
- Private
- Has stronger no-fault benefits (AccBen)
- BC
MARSHALL
Similarities and differences in PROBLEMS with BC and ON auto insurance.
- Similarities
- Severity is increasing for minor injuries
- Legal costs are too high
- Differences
- BC
- Frequency is increasing
- Severity of minor injuries is increasing
- ON
- Frequency is decreasing
- Severity of all injuries is increasing
- BC
MARSHALL
Similarities and differences in PROPOSED SOLUTIONS regarding BC and ON auto insurance.
- Similarities
- Shift focus from cash to care
- Reduce legal costs in both
- Difference
- BC
- Reform emphasizes auto product redesign
- Increase road safety because frequency is increasing
- ON
- Reform emphasizes structural changes in regulatory system
- Frequency is a lesser issue
- BC
MARSHALL
BC v ON: Which is the better auto insurance system : public or private?
Neither!
The goals of SUSTAINABILITY and AFFORDABILITY can be met by either a properly designed product or regulatory system.