AWA

Question 1

Introduction

Answer 1

In the passage, the author/speaker/title/company etc [choose only one and stay consistent!] argues that + [paraphrased] conclusion of the argument. This is based on the premise(s) that + [paraphrased] premise(s). However, on deeper analysis, it becomes apparent that certain relevant aspects have not been taken into consideration, leading to a number of mistaken assumptions and logical flaws.

Question 2

1st Paragraph

Answer 2

One such flaw is questionable assumption/invalid conclusion #1. Detailed explanation why it is invalid. In order to strengthen the argument, suggestion for improvement.

Question 3

2nd Paragraph

Answer 3

Moreover, the writer’s argument is incorrectly based on the assumption that questionable assumption/ invalid conclusion #2. Detailed explanation why it is invalid. To overcome this flaw, the argument should suggestion for improvement.

Question 4

3rd Paragraph

Answer 4

Optional (Time Permitting)
The writer also wrongly assumes/concludes thatquestionable assumption/ invalid conclusion #3. Detailed explanation why it is invalid. To render this argument more valid, the writer should demonstrate suggestion for improvement.]

Question 5

Conclusion

Answer 5

After closer examination of the passage presented, it is apparent that there are several logical flaws. The recommendations in the essay show how the argument may be strengthened and made more logically sound.