Automatism Flashcards

1
Q

What are the key stages to establish automatism?

A
  1. Involuntary act – Total loss of control (Broome v Perkins).
  2. External factor – Must be caused by an external factor (R v Quick).
  3. Self-induced automatism – May limit the defence depending on the offence.
  4. Effect on Liability -If fully proven, D is acquitted

If self-induced and reckless, D may still be guilty for basic intent offences.

..

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
2
Q
A
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
3
Q

What is automatism?

A

Automatism is a common law defence that can provide a complete defence when caused by an external factor

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
4
Q

What is the definition of automatism? And where was it defined

A

Defined in Bratty v AG for NI (1961) as:
“an act done by the muscles without any control by the mind, such as a spasm, a reflex action, or a convulsion; or an act done by a person who is not conscious of what he is doing.”

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
5
Q

What is the first requirement to establish automatism?

A

The act must be involuntary, meaning the defendant has a total lack of voluntary control over their actions.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
6
Q

Which case shows that some control means the defence is unavailable?

A

. Broome v Perkins – D was unable to use the defence as he had some control while swerving his car.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
7
Q

What is the second requirement for automatism?

A

The automatic state must be caused by an external factor (unlike insanity, which is caused by an internal factor).

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
8
Q

Give examples of external factors with cases. ( Hirt: there are 4 main ones we look at )

A

Sneezing – R v Whooley

PTSD from external trauma – R v T

Excess insulin (hypoglycaemia) – R v Quick / Bingham

Being attacked by bees

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
9
Q

external factors (R v Whooley)

A

Sneezing

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
10
Q

external factors (R v t)

A

PTSD from external trauma

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
11
Q

external factors (R v Quick/Bingham )

A

Excess insulin (hypoglycaemia)

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
12
Q

When is automatism self-induced?

A

When the defendant knows their actions could lead to an automatic state but does not take precautions.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
13
Q

How does self-induced automatism affect different offences?(hint:basic and specific)

A

Specific intent offences (e.g. murder) – D can still use the defence if they lacked intent.

Basic intent offences (e.g. assault) – The defence is not available if D was reckless in inducing the state.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
14
Q

What must D prove to rely on automatism?

A

That they lacked the mens rea due to an external factor causing a total loss of control.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
15
Q

When is automatism a complete defence?

A

If all elements are satisfied, D is acquitted. However, if it was self-induced, the availability depends on the offence type.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly