automatism Flashcards

You may prefer our related Brainscape-certified flashcards:
1
Q

what type of defence is automatism?

A

full defence

if successful, results in a full acquittal

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
2
Q

who is the burden of proof on for automatism

A

defendant

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
3
Q

where is automatism defined?

A

Bratty v Attorney-General for Northern Ireland

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
4
Q

how is automatism defined

A

‘an act done by the muscles without any control by the mind, such as a spasm, a reflex action or a convulsion

or an act done by a person who is not conscious of what he is doing’

Bratty v Attorney-General for Northern Ireland

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
5
Q

what is the test for automatism?

A

1) Involuntary act

2) Caused by an external cause

The requirements for automatism:

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
6
Q

what are some external factors that could be covered by the defence?

A

Some external factors that could be covered by this definition include
* sneezing (R v Wholly)

  • hypnotism
  • unknown effects of a drug
  • blow to the head
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
7
Q

there must be a … for automatism to be successful

A

There must be a full lack of control as seen in AG’s Reference (No. 2). The partial loss of control does not amount to automatism

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
8
Q

can stress be an external factor?

automatism

A

R v T (1990) - exceptional stress can be an external factor that may cause automatism

R v Narborough (2004) - stress not seen as giving rise to automatism

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
9
Q

self-induced automatism

can it be a defence?

A

Bailey - if D has been reckless in getting into a state of automatism, self-induced automatism cannot be a defence

D diabetic + failed to eat enough after insulin. Hit some1with iron bar

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
10
Q

self-induced automatism

exception

A

Hardie - BUT Where the defendant does not know that his actions are likely to lead to a self-induced automatic state in which he may commit an offence, he has not been reckless and can use the defence of automatism.

(D depressed, took valium tablets. Set fire to a wardrobe)

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly