Auditing part 2 Flashcards
Which of the following information discovered during an audit most likely would raise a question concerning possible illegal acts?
The entity prepared several large checks payable to cash during the year.
Large checks payable to cash would be most likely to raise questions regarding possible illegal acts. Valid company disbursements are typically made by check and controlled through accounts payable. Cash payments are unusual and difficult to control. As a result, large checks payable to cash would present a red flag during the audit.
Which of the following factors most likely would cause a CPA to not accept a new audit engagement?
The prospective client is unwilling to make all financial records available to the CPA.
A CPA would not accept a client who was unwilling to make all financial records available.
Access to all financial records would be a minimum requirement for the audit, and management is required to state in the management representation letter that all financial records and data have been made available to the auditors.
Which of the following statements concerning the auditor’s use of the work of a specialist is correct?
If the specialist is related to the client, the auditor is still permitted to use the specialist’s findings as corroborative evidence.
The specialist is not required to be independent. The auditor, however, must evaluate the nature of the relationship of the specialist to the client and assess the specialist’s ability to be objective.
Disclosure of irregularities to parties other than a client’s senior management and its audit committee or board of directors ordinarily is not part of an auditor’s responsibility.
However, to which of the following outside parties may a duty to disclose irregularities exist?
YES to all 3
To the SEC when the client reports an auditor change
To a successor auditor when the successor makes appropriate inquiries
To a government funding agency from which the client receives financial assistance
In a financial statement audit, inherent risk is evaluated to help an auditor assess which of the following?
The susceptibility of a financial statement assertion to a material misstatement assuming there are no related controls.
AICPA Professional Standards define inherent risk as “…the susceptibility of an assertion about a class of transactions, account balance, or disclosure to a misstatement that could be material, either individually or when aggregated with other misstatements, before consideration of any related controls.
herent risk and control risk differ from detection risk in that inherent risk and control risk are
Functions of the client and its environment while detection risk is not.
Inherent risk and control risk (also called environmental risks) are functions of the client and its environment, while detection risk is not. As a result, inherent risk and control risk can only be assessed by the auditor, while detection risk is controlled by the auditor.
Which of the following information that comes to an auditor’s attention would be most likely to raise a question about the occurrence of illegal acts?
The discovery of unexplained payments made to government employees.
Doesn’t this immediately raise questions??!! Why would payments be made to government employees, especially unexplained payments? They sound like bribes.
Which of the following factors most likely would cause an auditor not to accept a new audit engagement?
Concluding that the entity’s management probably lacks integrity.
Management integrity via the control environment sets the tone of an organization and provides the foundation for all other components of internal control. An inherent limitation of an internal control structure is the possibility of management override. Thus, the lack of management integrity can impact the audit in terms of the occurrence of both employee and management errors and irregularities. If the auditor believes that management lacks integrity, the risk that material misstatements might not be discovered becomes unacceptably high. As a result, the auditor would probably decide not to accept the engagement.
An auditor who discovers that a client’s employees have paid small bribes to public officials most likely would withdraw from the engagement if the
Employees’ actions affect the auditor’s ability to rely on management’s representations.
An auditor may withdraw from an engagement when he/she believes that there is such a significant risk of fraud that it is not practicable to modify the procedures that are planned for the audit sufficiently to address the risk. If management fails to respond appropriately to the auditor’s discovery of the payment of bribes to public officials, it may indicate a more pervasive problem, even though the amounts involved were small. This failure may impact the auditor’s ability to rely on management’s representations and result in withdrawal from the engagement.
Which of the following conditions most likely would pose the greatest risk in accepting a new audit engagement?
There will be a client-imposed scope limitation.
ANY client-imposed scope limitation is a problem. When you add that problem to the greater risk arising from a new client, you have greatly increased the risk related to the new engagement. A new client, by definition, is a client that will require more time to study and understand in order to perform the audit. If the client is also telling the auditors that certain audit procedures will not be allowed, the risk of missing a material misstatement becomes very high.
Which of the following would an auditor most likely use in determining the auditor’s preliminary judgment about materiality?
The entity’s annualized interim financial statements.
The auditor’s preliminary judgment about materiality is a judgment about the amount of a misstatement in the financial statements under audit, which would be considered material (one that could influence the decision of a reasonable person relying on the financial statements). It is appropriate and likely, therefore, for the auditor to consider the entity’s annualized interim financial statements in developing such a judgment.
In using the work of a specialist, an auditor may refer to the specialist in the auditor’s report if, as a result of the specialist’s findings, the auditor
Becomes aware of circumstances that cause the auditor to express a modified opinion.
An auditor may refer to the specialist in the auditor’s report if, as a result of the specialist’s findings, the auditor modifies the report and believes that the reference will enable readers to better understand why the modification was made.
Should an auditor communicate the following matters to an audit committee (or those charged with governance) of a public entity?
YES
Significant audit adjustments recorded by the entity
Management’s consultation with other accountants about significant accounting matters
The auditor is required to communicate both significant audit adjustments recorded by the entity and management's consultations with other accountants about significant accounting matters to the audit committee (or those charged with governance).
Which of the following statements is correct concerning materiality in a financial statement audit?
Materiality levels are generally considered in terms of the smallest aggregate level of misstatement that could be considered material to any one of the financial statements.
The auditor is required to determine materiality for the financial statements as a whole. As a result, the auditor ordinarily considers materiality for planning purposes in terms of the smallest aggregate level of misstatements that could be considered material to any one of the financial statements.
Which of the following comparisons would be most useful to an auditor in evaluating the results of an entity’s operations?
Current year revenue to budgeted current year revenue.
A comparison of current year revenue to budgeted revenue would be very useful to an auditor in evaluating the results of operations. It would tell the auditor how well the entity did compared to the plan. The comparison would also enable the auditor to predict the effects on other income statement accounts, such as related expense accounts.