AUD Deck 5-Audit Evidence-Concepts & Standards Flashcards
Nature-
The auditor has to decide what specific substantive procedure to perform. This includes determining how much emphasis should be placed on “test of details” versus substantive “analytical procedures”.
Timing-
The auditor has to decide whether to perform the important substantive procedures, at an “interim date” or at “final”.
Extent-
The auditor has to decide how large the samples sizes should be. Since the audit work is performed on a “test basis”, should the sample sizes be relatively large or can smaller sample sizes be justified?
Substantive Audit Procedures-
These are audit procedures that are directly related to the f/s elements & disclosures. Or in other words “to search for material misstatements if there are any.”
Test of details-
These are relatively precise (but usually rather expensive, labor intensive) procedures (that suggest whether the client’s recorded amounts are right or not.)
Tests of Ending Balances-
Verifying the client’s recorded amounts by directly testing the composition making up the ending account balance.
Analytical procedures-Evaluations of financial information through analysis of plausible relationships among both financial & non financial data. Analytical procedures serve 3 distinct purposes-
1) They are useful as a risk assessment procedure for planning purposes.
2) They are useful (but not required) as a form of substantive evidence.
3) The auditor is required to perform analytical procedures as near the end of the audit to assist the auditor when forming an overall conclusion about the f/s.
The AICPA states that the effectiveness & efficiency of substantive analytical procedures depends on the following 4 factors or considerations:
1) Nature of Assertion
2) Plausibility & predictability of the relationship
3) Availability & reliability of data used
4) Precision of the expectation
Audit evidence-
Information used by the auditor in arriving at the conclusions on which the auditor’s opinion is based. Audit evidence includes both information contained in the accounting records underlying the f/s and other information.
Audit procedures for Obtaining Evidence-The auditor’s basis for conclusion is comprised of 3 categories of procedures:
1) Risk assessment procedures
2) Test of controls
3) substantive procedures
Risk Assessment Procedures-
The audit procedures performed to obtain an understanding of the entity & it’s environment, including the entity’s internal control, to identify & assess the risks of material misstatement, whether due to fraud or error, at the financial statement & relevant assertion levels.
The auditor’s substantive procedures should include the following related to the financial reporting process;
1) Agree the financial statement information to the underlying accounting records.
2) Examine material journal entries and other adjustments made during the preparation of the financial statements.
As covered in the course materials on Internal Controls, the auditor should document the following matters:
1) The overall responses to address the assessed risk of misstatement at the financial statement level.
2) The nature, timing, and extent of the further audit procedures.
3) The linkage of those procedures with the assessed risks at the relevant assertion level.
4) The results of the audit procedures.
5) The conclusions reached in the current audit about the operating effectiveness of controls tested in the prior audit.
Misstatement-
A difference between the amount, classification, presentation, or disclosure of a reported financial statement item and the amount, classification, presentation, or disclosure that is required for the item to be in accordance with the applicable reporting framework.
Uncorrected Misstatements-
Misstatements that the auditor has accumulated during the audit and that have not been corrected.