Attribution Flashcards
Attributions, general
Causal statements
Focus on thought processes used in explaining behavior, predicting future behavior
The accuracy of personal beliefs or principles is irrelevant to the process of making attributions
Attributions can range from being highly automatic to being the result of controlled, careful, logical thought
Fritz Heider – first to really point out internal vs external: saw humans as “naïve scientists” who would gather info, put it together and draw conclusions about why people they and act they do.
Dimensions of Attributions
Locus – internal/external
–e.g. depression and loneliness associated with making internal attributions for negative events, but external attributions for positive events
Stability – related to expectations of success and achievement motivation
Controllability – individual’s determination of whether the actor could behave differently; associated with the motion such as guilt and shame
Globality – how consistent across situations a causal factor is expected to be
Intentionality – whether the actor’s behavior was purposeful
Three-Stage Model of Attribution
Identification-What is the actor doing?
Attribution – automatic dispositional inference
Effortful situational correction
Kelley’s Model of Causal Attribution
Covariation principle
– behavior is attributed to the cause with which it covaries over time
Consensus
– do other people experience the same effect with respect to this entity?
Consistency
– How behavior varies across situations
– Does the effect occur each time the entity is present, regardless of the form of the interactions?
–high consistency = good attribution
Distinctiveness
– specificity of the occurrence of the behavior, i.e. how the behavior varies as a function of the target (entity).
Attribute to the entity
- High consensus
- High consistency
- High distinctiveness
Attribute to the actor
- Low consensus
- High consistency
- Low distinctiveness
Causal Schemas
Mental models of causalities that allow us to make attributions without necessarily analyzing all available data
Attribution Process Model (chapter 2)
Event occurs…
Noticing
– novel stimuli
– importance of event
– grabs attention
Interpreting
– ambiguous events are likely to be interpreted in terms of more accessible cognitive category
Immediate Attribution
– spontaneous, require little effort
1. Temporal order
2. Temporal and spatial contiguity cues
3. Similarity cues – events are frequently attributed to causes that are similar in some way
4. In addition to perceptual cues, immediate attributions may result from individuals personal beliefs or social theories being applied to the event
Problem Formulation
– mostly automatic, non conscious
– controlled by guiding knowledge structure
– the most accessible structure that meets some criterion if it is most likely considered first
– this is how individual differences in formulation of the same event may occur
Problem Resolution
– integration of the various pieces of information collected during problem formulation into a “best” attribution
Evaluation of Satisfaction
– receiver must decide whether the best attribution is satisfying enough
Motivational Influences
– motivational factors are important at each step, except problem resolution
– motivationally relevant variables (needs, goals) frequently have impact through purely cognitive processes
– motivational variables can also influence the selection of guiding knowledge structures and relevant information in the problem formulation stage
Consumer Behavior
What kind of attributions do you want to elicit from audience when you are creating an ad.
Kelley’s model:
– consensus: everyone wants it
– distinct (it’s like no other product)
– consistency (many people recommend it)
Internal/Stable
dispositions
traits
level of ability
intelligence
physical characteristics
Internal/Unstable
effort
mood
physical state
External/Stable
degree of task difficulty
environmental helps and hindrances
External/Unstable
good or bad luck
opportunity
transient situational factors