Brainscape's Knowledge GenomeTM

Browse over 1 million classes created by top students, professors, publishers, and experts.


See full index

Intro to Cognitive Psychology > Attention > Flashcards

Attention Flashcards

You may prefer our related Brainscape-certified flashcards:
GRE® Psychology flashcards Psychology 101 flashcards AP® Psychology flashcards
1
Q

5 functions of attention

A
  1. Focusing: Limiting the number of items being processed
  2. Perceptual Enhancement: Increasing perceptual acuity for the selected stimulus
  3. Binding: Combining distinct features into a percept of a single object
  4. Sustaining Behaviour: Maintaining an action/thought in the presence of potential distraction
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
2
Q

Early filter theory

A

You’re not processing the meaning of certain inputs (filter is before semantic processing)

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
3
Q

Late filter theory

A

We process stuff and then decide if it’s worth attending to (filter is after semantic processing)

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
4
Q

How we process information

A

Sensory inputs –> Sensory memory (doesn’t last long) –> Semantic processing breaks up inputs into meaningful units –> Conscious awareness

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
5
Q

Dichotic listening

A

A technique in which different streams of auditory information are played to each ear using headphones

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
6
Q

How is attention manipulated in dichotic listening tasks?

A

Attention is manipulated by asking subjects to

“shadow” the content presented to one ear

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
7
Q

How is processing of unattended information assessed?

A

Processing of unattended information is assessed by asking questions about the auditory stream which wasn’t shadowed:

  • what did the voice say?
  • what language was it in?
  • was the voice male or female?
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
8
Q

Cocktail party effect

A

Ability to focus on one source of auditory information

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
9
Q

Evidence for late filters in dichotic listening tasks

A
  • Morray found that 30% of subjects noticed if their name was presented in the unattended stream.
  • Treisman asked subjects to shadow the content in one ear when content made more sense across ears (Basically you’re hearing the story in the attended stream and it’s continued in the unattended stream and you pay attention to both because it makes more sense)
  • Gay and Wedderburn found a similar bias
    using numbers and words
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
10
Q

Attenuation model

A
  • A theory in its own right, but also used to reconcile the early filter vs. late filter debate
  • Treisman proposed an attenuation model in which unattended information isn’t completely blocked — like a leaky filter
  • Attenuator operates early — before semantic processing; unattended information still makes its way over to semantic processing, but it’s a lot weaker than the attended information
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
11
Q

What happens to unattended information in the attenuation model?

A

Unattended content can activate a dictionary unit (gain conscious awareness) if it is a:

  • Permanent Priority (e.g. name, danger) - perpetually low threshold for activation
  • Current Priority (e.g. continuation of sentence) - as the conversation goes on, thresholds decrease; depends on the context
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
12
Q

Load and capacity theories

A
  • Lavie argued that how we process unattended information is determined by: processing capacity and perceptual load
  • This means that the degree to which you process
    unattended information depends on an interaction between your capacity and primary task difficulty - processing load matters
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
13
Q

Processing capacity

A

The amount of information that people can simultaneously process

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
14
Q

Perceptual load

A

Related to task difficulty

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
15
Q

What makes us attend?

A
  • Exogenous attention

- Endogenous attention

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
16
Q

Exogenous attention

A
  • Automatic deployment of attention to a salient aspect of environment
  • e.g. a loud noise or sudden motion
  • fast and obligatory
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
17
Q

Endogenous attention

A
  • Conscious deployment of attention to a behaviourally
    important target
  • e.g. a lecture, reading, conversation in a noisy environment
  • slower and requires effort
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
18
Q

How do we deploy attention?

A
  • Overt attention

- Covert attention

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
19
Q

Overt attention

A

Shifting attention by focusing the eyes on a target

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
20
Q

Covert attention

A

Shifting attention without focusing the eyes on a target — attention is directed to a different region of space than the eyes

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
21
Q

How did Heimholtz present empirical proof that we can covertly attend?

A
  • Helmholtz (1894) provided empirical proof that we
    can covertly attend by holding his fixation constant
    but moving his attention
  • He could report more letters from the attended as compared to unattended location after a brief display
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
22
Q

Posner’s precuing paradigm

A

Fixate -> covertly attend to cue -> respond to target

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
23
Q

3 types of trials in Posner’s precuing paradigm

A
  • Neutral- target location was not indicated
  • Valid- arrow directed attention to the correct location (80%)
  • Invalid- arrow directed attention to the incorrect location (20%)
24
Q

Solutions to load/capacity problems

A
  • You can train yourself to have a higher capacity

- You can figure out ways to make certain tasks easier

25
Q

Posner’s precuing - What are the independent and dependent variables?

A

Independent variable - cue type (three conditions: valid, invalid or neutral)
Dependent variable - reaction time

26
Q

Does Posner’s precuing paradigm test exogenous or endogenous attention? How could you change the task to study the other form of attention?

A
  • Endogenous - you need to deploy your covert attention yourself
  • You can convert this to exogenous by using a flashing light
27
Q

Why are there more valid than invalid trials in Posner’s precuing?

A

More valid trials than invalid trials because then the cue would just always be neutral

28
Q

Why do you need a neutral condition in Posner’s precuing?

A
  • Neutral condition gives you a point of reference/baseline - lets you see whether reaction time decreases or increases
  • Allows you to interpret the results (having attention in right spot makes you faster + wrong spot, slower and worse than not having your attention anywhere at all)
29
Q

What do the results tell us about the time taken to deploy attention? How can you test this timing more directly?

A

With the invalid cue. you need to disengage attention from wrong place and refocus it, so additional time. You can test timing playing with onset of cue and how long it takes for the representation to show up on the screen

30
Q

Attention as a spotlight

A
  • An early metaphor for attention was that it was a spotlight that moved across space and lit the attended location
  • Consistent with Posner’s findings - if attention was in the right location then processing was faster than if it was in the wrong location
  • But does attention always need to be allocated to space or can it also be allocated to objects? (Spatial vs. object based theories)
31
Q

Scanning a scene with eye movements

A

Necessary; good detail vision only for things you are looking at directly

32
Q

Central vision

A
  • The area you are looking at

- Objects here fall on the fovea (has better vision)

33
Q

Peripheral vision

A
  • Everything off to the side

- Area not on fovea falls on peripheral retina

34
Q

Fixation

A

Pausing of the eyes on places of interest while observing a scene

35
Q

Saccadic eye movement

A

Rapid jerky eye movement from one fixation point to another - we move our eyes about 3 times per second

36
Q

Stimulus salience

A

Physical properties of the stimulus - example of bottom up process

37
Q

Salience map

A

Map of a scene that indicates the stimulus salience of areas and objects in the scene

38
Q

Scanning based on cognitive factors

A
  • Variations in how people scan scenes
  • Example of top-down/cognitive processing
  • Scene Schema – person’s knowledge about what’s likely to be contained in a scene
  • Guides attention to different areas of scene
39
Q

Scanning based on task demands

A
  • Tasks: people shift attention from one place to another as they’re doing things
  • E.g. Driving
  • Timing of when people look at specific places = determined by the sequence of actions involved in the task
40
Q

Just in Time Strategy

A
  • Eye movements occur just before we need the information they will provide
  • When eye movements & fixations = closely linked to the action a person is about to take
  • Eye movement comes before a motor action by a fraction of a second
41
Q

What do scanning based on tasks and scanning based on cognitive factors have in common?

A

Evidence that scanning is influenced by people’s predictions about what is likely to happen

42
Q

Inattentional blindness

A

When you don’t perceive something in your environment that is clearly present

43
Q

Change blindness

A

When you don’t notice more subtle changes to your environment after a brief delay

44
Q

Differences between inattentional and change blindness

A
  • Change detection requires attention to the changed part of the image + memory for
    what it looked like before
  • You can overcome in attentional blindness by simply attending to the ignored stimulus
45
Q

Why do some tasks require more attention?

A
  • Processing load matters
  • More processing steps require more attention
  • Holding more content in mind requires more attention
46
Q

Automaticity in tasks

A
  • Practice can decrease the capacity that a task requires
  • With enough practice a task that requires a lot of attention can become automatic
  • Truly automatic tasks can be performed at the same time as another task without hurting the performance of other task — they can be performed in parallel
  • Reading and driving are examples of two tasks that become nearly automatic with time
47
Q

Stroop effect

A
  • Word reading interferes with colour naming:
  • Reading is virtually automatic for adults
  • Becomes obligatory - hard to suppress even if it is not
    the right thing to do
  • The reverse isn’t true! Only reading is automatic, not
    colour naming
48
Q

Conditions of Stroop effect

A
  • Conflict trials (e.g. RED)
  • Congruent trials (e.g. BLUE)
  • Neutral trials (e.g. CAT)
49
Q

Feature integration theory

A

Treisman proposed that features are processed in parallel without attention; attention is required to bind the features of an object together

50
Q

Visual search tasks

A
  • Have been used to test when attention is needed
  • Many objects are presented in a display
  • Job is to detect wether or not a target is present
51
Q

Simple Visual Search

A
  • The target can be identified by a single feature
  • The amount of time that it takes to identify a target is independent of the number of distractors
  • Implies that all objects are processed
    at once - Parallel process
52
Q

Conjunctive Visual Search

A
  • A combination of features is required to identify a target
  • The amount of time that it takes to identify a target increases with the number of distractors
  • Implies that objects are inspected one at a time - Serial process
53
Q

Illusory conjunctions

A

A situation, demonstrated in experiments by Anne Treisman, in which features from different objects are inappropriately combined, even if the stimuli greatly differ in size and shape. Supports the FIT. However, though it’s usually bottom top, if context is given, this effect fades (e.g. an object stated to be a carrot will pretty much always be perceived as orange)

54
Q

Feature Integration Theory challenges

A
  • The degree to which targets ‘pop out’ depends on which features are combined (size and colour are easy to put together)
  • Wolf et al argued that visual search always has two stages:
    1. First stage is parallel and identifies potential targets
    2. Second stage is serial: sequentially evaluates each target
55
Q

Balint’s syndrome

A

A condition caused by brain damage in which a person has difficulty focusing attention on individual objects.

56
Q

The case of R.M.

A

He had Balint’s syndrome and since he couldn’t focus on individual objects, he combined features incorrectly. Supports FIT.

Intro to Cognitive Psychology (7 decks)

Brainscape helps you reach your goals faster, through stronger study habits.
© 2024 Bold Learning Solutions. Terms and Conditions