Attempts Flashcards
Section for Attempts
Section 72 Crimes Act 1961
Definition of attempts (Must know)
Having intent to commit an offence, does or omits an act for the purpose of accomplishing his object
List the three conditions required for an attempt (Must know)
- Mens rea - intent to commit an offence
- Actus reus - did or omitted an act to achieve his object
- Proximity - the act or omissions was sufficiently close to the full offence
What intent is required for an attempt?
Intent to commit the substantive offence
Can one commit an attempted offence by recklessness or negligence?
No. Attempt requires intent to commit a full offence.
E.g. attempted manslaughter is not possible as manslaughter the death is unintended.
How can intent for an attempt be proven and what is the related case law?
Intent may be inferred from the act itself.
R v Ring - the offenders intent was to steal property by putting his hand into the pocket of the victim. Unbeknown to the offender the pocket was empty.
Despite this he was able to be convicted of attempted theft, because the intent to steal whatever property might have been discovered inside the pocket was present in his mind and demonstrated by his actions.
Is intent for an attempt a question of fact or law? (Must know)
A question of fact (for the jury to decide)
Discuss proximity as it relates to an attempt (Must know)
An act or omission may constitute an attempt if it is immediately or proximately connected with the intended offence, whether or not there was any act unequivocally showing the intent to commit the offence.
They accused must have started the full offence and gone beyond mere preparation (“all but” rule)
What does the court refer to in providing examples of an attempt and give at least three examples?
The American Model Penal Code.
- Lying in wait, searching for a contemplated victim
- enticing the victim to go to the scene of the contemplated crime
- unlawfully entering a structure, vehicle or enclosure in which it is contemplated that a crime will be committed
- possessing, collecting or fabricating materials to be employed in the crime
- soliciting an innocent agent to engage in conduct constituting an element of the crime
- reconnoitring the scene of the contemplated crime
What does R v Harper state? (Must know)
The court may have regard to the conduct viewed cumulatively up to the point when the conduct in question stops… the defendant’s conduct may be considered in its entirety. Considering how much remains to be done … is alway relevant, though not determinative
Is the proximity of an attempt a question of law or fact? (Must know)
It is a question of law (decided by judge)
What is the two questions used as a test for proximity?
- Has the offender done anything more than getting himself into a position from which he could embark on an actual attempt
- Has the offender actually commenced execution: that is to say, has he taken a step in the actual crime itself?
Can a person be convicted of an attempted offence that was impossible to commit? (Must know)
They can if it was physically impossible, not one which was legally impossible
What is Higgins v Police? (Must know)
Where plants being cultivated as cannabis are not in fact cannabis it is physically, not legally, impossible to cultivate such prohibited plants.
Accordingly, it is possible to commit the offence of attempting to cultivate cannabis
What is Police v Jay? (Must know)
A man bought hedge clippings believing they were cannabis, and this amounted to an attempt