Accessory after the fact Flashcards

1
Q

Section and elements of Accessory After the Fact (Liability)

A

Section 71(1) Crimes Act 1961

Elements:
- Anyone
- Knowing any person to have been a party to the offence
- Receives OR comforts OR assists that person OR tampers with OR actively suppresses any evidence against him
- In order to enable him to escape after arrest OR to avoid arrest OR conviction

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
2
Q

List all case law for accessory after the fact (Liability)

A
  • R v Crooks
  • R v Briggs
  • R v Mane
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
3
Q

Define the element “any person” for accessory after the fact (Liability)

A

This is any person other than the defendant. Proven by JN and CE.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
4
Q

Can a spouse be an accessory after the fact for offences pre the Crimes Amendments Act 2019? (Must know)

A

No, as the limitation still applies to offences prior to this. After this a spous would be liable.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
5
Q

Definition of offence for Accessory After the Fact (Liability)

A

Any act or omission that is punishable upon conviction under any enactment

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
6
Q

What stage must an offence be in for someone to be considered an accessory after the fact?

A

The offence must be complete. If not completed the person assisting would be a party to the offence.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
7
Q

Define R v Crooks (Liability)

A

Knowledge means actual knowledge, or belief, in the sense of having no real doubt that the person assisted was a party to the relevant offence. Mere suspicion is insufficent.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
8
Q

What are the two aspects of knowledge required for Accessory After the Fact? (Must know)

A
  • An offence has been committed, and
  • The person they are assisting was a party to that offence
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
9
Q

What is R v Briggs? (Liability)

A

Knowledge may also be inferred from wilful blindness or a deliberate abstention from making inquiries that would confirm the suspected truth.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
10
Q

Discuss wilful blindness as it relates to accessory after the fact (Liability)

A

Wilful blindness should not simply be invoked because the person should have inquired into the facts. They must deliberate shut their eyes and fail to enquire because they knew what the answer would be.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
11
Q

What is the actus reus of Accessory After the Fact? Does this need to be deliberate? (Must know)

A
  • Receives
  • comforts
  • assists
  • tampers with evidence
  • actively suppresses evidence

The acts must be deliberate intentional acts.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
12
Q

What is R v Mane? (Liability)

A

To be considered an accessory, the act done by the person must be after the completion of the offence.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
13
Q

Define receives, comforts or assists and give examples (Liability)

A

Receives, comforts or assists express a general view that the accessory assisted the offender(s) to evade justice.

Receiving could include harbouring and offender or offering them shelter.

Comforting includes providing food or clothing.

Assist covers a significant number of situations including providing transport, acting as a look out etc.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
14
Q

How does tampers with or actively suppresses evidence compare to Receives, comforts or assists.

A

tampers with or actively suppresses are more explicit in that they show a requirement for some form of active conduct in respect of EVIDENCE.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
15
Q

Define tampers with evidence and give an example (Liability)

A

To alter the evidence against the offender.

E.g. Modifying an offender’s telephone records to conceal communications

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
16
Q

Define actively suppresses evidence and give an example (Liability)

A

Concealing or destroying evidence against an offender.

E.g. Bloodied clothing it washed repetitively or burnt to destroy it.

17
Q

Can someone be charged with attempting to be an accessory?

A

Yes

18
Q

Can a person indirectly provide assistance for an Accessory after the fact offence?

A

Yes

19
Q

Can an innocent agent be liable if employed by an accessory? (Must know)

A

No. An innocent agents actions will be held to be those of the accessory.

20
Q

What are the three intents, one of which a defendant must have, to be an accessory after the fact?

A
  • to escape after arrest
  • to avoid arrest
  • to avoid conviction
21
Q

Does a principal offender need to be proceeded against for a secondary party, accessory after the fact or receiver of stolen or dishonest property to be charged?

A

No

22
Q

Does a principal offender and a secondary party, accessory after the fact or receiver of stolen or dishonest property need to be charged jointly?

A

No. They may be proceeded against alone or jointly

23
Q

Can multiple people be charged with receiving the same property?

A

Yes.

23
Q

Can an accessory after the fact challenge proof the original offence was committed?

A

Yes, including situations where the principal offender has pleaded guilty to the principal offence.

24
Q

Can a accessory be convicted despite the principal offender being acquitted? (Must know)

A

Yes, unless the accessory conviction is inconsistent with the acquittal.