Attempted Sexual Violation Flashcards
How is attempted sexual violation and assault with intent to commit sexual violation distinguished?
- an attempt to commit sexual violation does not necessarily involve an assault
- an assault with intent to commit sexual violation may not be sufficiently proximate to the full offence to constitute an attempt.
Attempts to Commit Sexual Violation - Section 129(1) CA 1961
Attempts to Commit Sexual Violation Section 129(1) CA 1961 - 10 years imprisonment
everyone who
attempts to commit sexual violation
of the other person
Attempts legislation
Section 72 (1) - CA 1961
Every one who, having an intent to commit an offence, does or omits an act for the purpose of accomplishing his object, is guilty of an attempt to commit the offence intended, whether in the circumstances it was possible to commit the offence or not.
When is a person guilty of an attempt to commit an offence?
- intend to commit the offence, and
* take a real and substantial step towards achieving that aim
Intent to commit sexual violation - what must the Crown prove?
- Defendant intended to commit the full act of sexual violation and
- acted as he did for the purpose of achieving that aim
** EXAM ** - Define intent
In a criminal law context there are two specific types of intention in an offence. Firstly there must be an intention to commit the act and secondly, an intention to get a specific result.
How to prove intent?
The onus is generally on the prosecution to prove an offender’s intent beyond reasonable doubt.
While an offender’s admissions as to their intent are potentially good evidence, it is good practice to support these with circumstantial evidence from which their intent can also be inferred.
** EXAM ** - What circumstantial evidence can an offenders intent be inferred from?
- the offender’s actions and words before, during and after the event
- the surrounding circumstances
- the nature of the act itself
** EXAM ** - What must the crown prove for attempted sexual violation and assault with intent to commit sexual violation?
At the time of the defendant’s conduct he:
- intended to have sexual connection with the complainant, and
- the complainant did not consent to the intended sexual connection; and
- the defendant did not believe on reasonable grounds that the complainant was consenting
To be guilty of an attempt the defendant must have….
Progressed past the stage of preparation and started a process intended to lead to the commission of the full offence.
** EXAM ** - Attempts Case Law
R v Harpur
An attempt includes “an act or omission constituting a substantial step in a course of conduct planned to culminate in his commission of the crime”.
Assessing proximity
In assessing proximity, the Court will analyse the defendant’s conduct at the relevant time, in conjunction with evidence of his intent based on the circumstances and any steps taken leading up to that point.
What does the cumulative assessment allow the court to infer?
The defendant had intended to commit the full offence and had started to do so, even though he may still have been several steps removed from the ultimate act.
** EXAM ** - Sufficiently proximate - Case Law
R v Harpur
The Court may have regard to the conduct viewed cumulatively up to the point when the conduct in question stops the defendant’s conduct may be considered in its entirety. Considering how much remains to be done is always relevant, though not determinative.
Examples that may constitute an attempt?
- lying in wait, searching for or following the contemplated victim
- enticing the victim to go to the scene of the contemplated crime
- reconnoitring the scene of the contemplated offence
- unlawful entry of a structure, vehicle or enclosure in which it is contemplated that the offence will be committed
- possession, collection or fabrication of materials to be employed in the commission of the offence
- soliciting an innocent agent to engage in conduct constituting an element of the offence