Attachment- Reciprocity and interactional synchrony Flashcards

You may prefer our related Brainscape-certified flashcards:
1
Q

attachment definition

A

strong, emotional bond between a caregiver and an infant- reciprocal and enduring

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
2
Q

characteristics of attachment- Maccoby (1980)

A

-seeking proximity
-separation anxiety
-pleasure when reunited
-general orientation of behaviour towards caregiver

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
3
Q

reciprocity AO1

A

-develops at early age (3 months)
-two way/mutual process
-each party responds to signals
-behaviour elicits response from other
-showing sensitive responsiveness creates strong foundations for later attachments

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
4
Q

research into reciprocity

A

Tronik et al (1975) ‘still face study’
- mother dialogue with baby
-then mum stops responding (straight face) so no reaction
-baby dont like face so tries to get reaction
- baby stressed

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
5
Q

reciprocity research conclusions

A

reciprocity is very important because
-shows that baby and caregiver respond to each others needs
- when caregiver stops responding baby’s reaction almost immediate

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
6
Q

interactional synchrony AO1

A

-interactions between infant and caregiver become finely synchronised in response as they mirror each other
-actions + emotions synchronised
-mirror

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
7
Q

back up interactional synchrony AO1 (study)

A

Isabella el al:
- 30 mums and infants
- found high levels of synchrony associated with better attachment

SO interactional synchrony is essential for attachment

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
8
Q

research into interactional synchrony

A

Meltzoff and Moore (1977)

-2 week old babies
-adult showed 1 of 3 facial expressions (tongue etc) OR 1 of 3 hand movements
-response filmed
-behavioural categories
-observer didnt know what the baby saw (cant see caregiver)
-association found
-innate rather than learned

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
9
Q

AO3- strengths

A
  1. well controlled research study
    -inter-rater reliability because independent
    observers can re watch tapes and compare
    findings- ensures objectivity
  2. practical applications
    • could encourage/ show parents importance of spending time with infant and responding to them.
      - studies show lack of early attachment could lead to possible behavioural deficiencies and lack of social skills
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
10
Q

AO3- weaknesses

A
  1. interpretation issues
    - what facial expression or gesture the infant was performing?
    - early age of development, infants don’t have fine control over expressions- could be misinterpreted
    -invalid data gathered prone to subjective interpretation
  2. doesn’t account for cultural differences
    -describes result not telling why happened
    -Le Vine et al. (1994) reported that Kenyan mothers have little physical contact or interaction with their infants, but such infants still develop secure attachments.
    -suggest that care-giver infant interactions are not as essential for developing social skills, and the theory therefore lacks external validity
  3. pseudo- imitation
    - not true imitation but just repeating behaviour thats rewarded
    -infant isn’t consciously translating what they see into matching movement
  4. cause and effect
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly