Attachment- Reciprocity and interactional synchrony Flashcards
attachment definition
strong, emotional bond between a caregiver and an infant- reciprocal and enduring
characteristics of attachment- Maccoby (1980)
-seeking proximity
-separation anxiety
-pleasure when reunited
-general orientation of behaviour towards caregiver
reciprocity AO1
-develops at early age (3 months)
-two way/mutual process
-each party responds to signals
-behaviour elicits response from other
-showing sensitive responsiveness creates strong foundations for later attachments
research into reciprocity
Tronik et al (1975) ‘still face study’
- mother dialogue with baby
-then mum stops responding (straight face) so no reaction
-baby dont like face so tries to get reaction
- baby stressed
reciprocity research conclusions
reciprocity is very important because
-shows that baby and caregiver respond to each others needs
- when caregiver stops responding baby’s reaction almost immediate
interactional synchrony AO1
-interactions between infant and caregiver become finely synchronised in response as they mirror each other
-actions + emotions synchronised
-mirror
back up interactional synchrony AO1 (study)
Isabella el al:
- 30 mums and infants
- found high levels of synchrony associated with better attachment
SO interactional synchrony is essential for attachment
research into interactional synchrony
Meltzoff and Moore (1977)
-2 week old babies
-adult showed 1 of 3 facial expressions (tongue etc) OR 1 of 3 hand movements
-response filmed
-behavioural categories
-observer didnt know what the baby saw (cant see caregiver)
-association found
-innate rather than learned
AO3- strengths
- well controlled research study
-inter-rater reliability because independent
observers can re watch tapes and compare
findings- ensures objectivity - practical applications
- could encourage/ show parents importance of spending time with infant and responding to them.
- studies show lack of early attachment could lead to possible behavioural deficiencies and lack of social skills
- could encourage/ show parents importance of spending time with infant and responding to them.
AO3- weaknesses
- interpretation issues
- what facial expression or gesture the infant was performing?
- early age of development, infants don’t have fine control over expressions- could be misinterpreted
-invalid data gathered prone to subjective interpretation - doesn’t account for cultural differences
-describes result not telling why happened
-Le Vine et al. (1994) reported that Kenyan mothers have little physical contact or interaction with their infants, but such infants still develop secure attachments.
-suggest that care-giver infant interactions are not as essential for developing social skills, and the theory therefore lacks external validity - pseudo- imitation
- not true imitation but just repeating behaviour thats rewarded
-infant isn’t consciously translating what they see into matching movement - cause and effect