Attachment - Paper 1 Flashcards
What is attachment?
A close, two-way emotional bond between two individuals in which each individual sees the other as essential for their own emotional security.
How can we recognise attachment?
. Proximity
. Separation distress
. Secure base behaviour
What is proximity?
Seeking closeness with the attachment figure
What is separation distress?
Becoming upset when the attachment figure leaves your presence
What is secure-base behaviour?
Leaving the attachment figure but regularly returning to them while playing/exploring
What are the social interactions associated with good quality attachments?
. Alert phases
. Interactional synchrony
. Reciprocity
. Active involvement
What are Alert Phases?
Babies have periodic alert phases where they signal that they are ready for interaction. Feldman + Eidelman (2007) suggested that mothers tend to respond to their babies alertness around 2/3 of the time, though this varies according to the skill of the mother, external factors eg. stress (Finegood et.al 2016).
From around 3 months this interaction becomes more frequent and involves both mother and baby paying close attention to each others facial and verbal signals (Feldman 2007)
What is Interactional Synchrony?
. Where caregiver and baby interact in such a way that their actions and emotions mirror each other. Their movements are coordinated/synchronized differs from reciprocity in that caregiver and baby are aware of how the other will respond.
. Meltzoff and Moore (1977) observed the beginnings of interactional synchrony as early as 2 weeks old. An adult displayed 1 of 3 facial expressions/gestures and the child’s response was filmed and identified by observers. There was a significant association between the expression/gesture and action of the baby.
. It is seen as providing the foundation for mother-infant attachment. Isabella et.al (1989) observed 30 mothers and babies, assessing their degree of synchrony and quality of attachment. They found an that high levels of synchrony were associated with better quality attachment.
What is reciprocity?
A description of how people interact where each person responds to the other and elicits a response from them.
It involves close attention to each others verbal and facial signals
A bond is maintained through reciprocity, as it encourages positive feelings in each individual
Brazelton et.al (1975) described it as being similar to a couples dance with each partner mirroring the others moves.
What is active involvement?
The idea that both mother/caregiver and baby play an active role in forming and maintaining the relationship, initiating interactions and taking turns to do so, rather than the baby playing a passive role and simply receiving care (traditional view)
What is a strength of theories of caregiver-infant interactions - filmed observations?
Research into caregiver-infant interactions is typically filmed in laboratories. This means that other activity which may distract infants is limited, and that observations can be rewatched repeatedly at a later date, reducing the likelihood of researchers missing key behaviors. Furthermore, having filmed interactions means that more than one observer can record and assess data, increasing the inter-rater reliability of the observations. Also, babies are unaware that they are being observed, so their behaviour doesn’t change even though they are involved in an overt observation. These all serve to increase the validity and reliability of findings.
What is a strength of theories of caregiver-infant interactions - practical value?
Research into caregiver-infant interactions has practical applications in improving parenting skills. For example, Crotwell et.al (2013) found that 10 minutes of Parent Child Interaction Therapy interactional synchrony in 20 mothers and their children. As such, research into caregiver infant interactions has real world applications and value.
What is a limitation of theories of caregiver-infant interactions - difficult to interpret?
There are difficulties associated with observing babies as young infants lack co-ordination and are almost immobile. The movements being observed are typically small hand movements/changes in expression - it is difficult to tell whether a baby smiling because they are happy or passing wind. Also, it is difficult to tell what is happening from the babies’ perspective - a movement may be a random twitch or be triggered by the caregivers’ actions. We cannot be certain that observed behaviors have any special meaning.
What is a limitation of theories of caregiver-infant interactions - developmental importance?
Simply observing behaviour doesn’t tell us it’s developmental importance. Feldman (2012) pointed out that ideas like synchrony and reciprocity simply give names observable patterns of caregiver/infant behaviors, without telling us the purpose of these behaviors. As a result, the extent to which research into caregiver-infant interactions can help us understand and predict childhood development is limited - reduced application
What is a counterargument for the developmental importance criticism (caregiver-infant interactions)?
There is evidence from other studies that suggests early interactions are important - Isabella et.al (1989) found that high levels of interactional synchrony were associated with better quality attachment. Concepts involved in caregiver-infant interactions can be used to predict the development of attachments. As such, research into caregiver-infant interactions is useful in predicting development.
What are Schaffer and Emerson’s (1964) four stages of attachment?
Asocial stage, Indiscriminate attachment stage, Specific attachment stage, Multiple attachments stage
What is the Asocial stage?
The period within the first 0-6 weeks of an infants life where they respond similarly to both humans and objects. However babies may show some preference to familiar adults and may be more easily comforted by them.
What is the indiscriminate attachment stage?
The period from around 2-7 months where infants begin to display more obvious, observable social behaviours. They show a clear preference towards humans over objects and prefer the company of familiar people, however they have no specific preferences to any one adult. They do not display stranger or separation anxiety
What is the specific attachment stage?
The period from around 7 months where infants begin to display the typical signs of attachment towards one particular person (said to be the primary attachment figure), including stranger and separation anxiety. They are said to have formed a specific attachment - this is more likely to be the person who responds to the child’s signals with the most skill, rather than the one they spend the most time with - the mother in 65% of cases.
What is the multiple attachment stage?
The period from around 10-11 months, where babies begin to display attachment behaviours to multiple people they are in regular contact with. These are referred to as secondary attachments. Shaffer and Emerson said that 29% of children form a secondary attachment within a month of forming a primary attachment. By 12 months most babies had developed multiple attachments.
What was the procedure of Schaffer and Emerson (1964)?
The study involved 60 babies - 31 boys and 29 girls - all from Glasgow and the majority from working class families. The researchers visited infants and their mothers every month for the first 12 months of the infants life, and again at 18 months. They asked questions about the babies responses to everyday attachment situations eg. parent leaves the room (separation anxiety), babies response to new people (stranger anxiety).
What were the findings and conclusions of Schaffer and Emerson (1964)?
. 50% of infants were primarily attached to their mothers, about half to fathers, and the rest to grandparents and siblings.
. Infants could have multiple attachments at once, regardless of whether they had a strong attachment to one specific person.
. Infants tended to form attachments to people who reacted sensitively to them (sensitive responsiveness) - this was the main factor in forming attachments, more than the amount of time spent together or physical care.
. The 4 stages of attachment
What is a strength of Schaffer and Emerson’s research - external validity?
Most of the observations except for stranger anxiety were made by parents during ordinary, everyday situations. This is a better alternative than having researchers be present and observing the infants in everyday life, which could have distracted the babies or made them anxious, reducing the validity of the infants behaviour as participants would not be behaving normally while being observed.
What is a counterargument for the external validity argument (Schaffer and Emerson)?
There are issues with asking mothers to be the observers in this research, as they are UNLIKELY TO BE OBJECTIVE. They may have been biased in terms of what they noticed and what they reported - they may not have noticed when a baby displayed a sign of anxiety or misremembered a behaviour. This means that even if the infants behaved naturally, their behaviour may not have been accurately recorded, reducing the internal validity and reliability of the findings.